|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
|
I got a 1934 Model 18 (european deuce) it was a stock 4 banger.
I am now running a flathead v8 with a 1939 transmission and the stock axle. For lower rpm on highway speeds i want to change my rear end ratio. Somewhere i read the internals of this axles are the same as Model A axles so i can use a model a gear set. Can someone confirm this ? i cannot find much information about the european model B
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kerrville, Tx
Posts: 2,919
|
Look at the flange on the totque tube where it bolts to the center section. If it is round, the rear uses Model A gears.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
|
Thanks !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,184
|
That is one nice car for sure, and a nice touch with the "big 'n little" tires, too. What part of the world are you in? DD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
he looks to be in a right hand drive county ,there's a guy who goes by Wadsi on here who has one UK
Last edited by FlatheadTed; 09-18-2016 at 05:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FP, NJ
Posts: 2,828
|
Is that body the same general size as the US body? It looks a bit smaller to me but perhaps that's an optical illusion caused by the larger rear wheels.
__________________
Don't never get rid of nuthin! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
According to Ford's dimensions contained in the U.S. and U.K. Sales Manuals, the U.K. Briggs body was taller by 2 1/2" inches, but had 3" less head room (which makes no sense). From the firewall to the rear seat, the distance was within a 1/2" between the two bodies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
The same drawings show the effective seat heights to be about the same although the U.K. Briggs saloon body has a depressed floor in the rear compartment which creates the impression of a higher rear seat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 4,213
|
I would replace the gear with a 3:54. What would be the benefit of a Model A rear gear as most of them are 3:78 or 4:11?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|