|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Terry<OH has kindly shared a photo of a tag found on a convertible.
It is more than apparent that Ford tagged "some" wagons and "some" convertibles. There appears to have been variations in the style / format of those tags. Still to be determined is when were these tags utilized and why on some vehicles and not others. In post #40, Terry makes a very valid point in regard to outside suppliers of bodies. However, at least from my research, (only) Ford was making the bodies by 1940.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 37
|
Sorry Kube no tags on my Convert. When I bought had an after market firewall is there anyplace else the number may be stamped?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 37
|
Hi Yours looks in much better shape than the one I bought. Mine has been a 2 year nightmare and still going. please keep in touch and let me know your progress. I would be happy to send you any pics of my progress but mine is a restomod with a brand new Chevy drive train. Ive had no reference where anything goes because mine has a new floor and firewall with no holes so Ive had to do my own figuring with some help from guys on here especially Kube.
Frank |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Junior Member
|
My convertible has a tag in the upper left coroner of the firewall write above where the wire conduit goes through. It was attached with the original drive nails.The tag number is O1A66-971 i have never seen any numbers stamped on my original firewall. If any one would please tell me what these numbers mean. I would like to know. My frame number is star 18 - 5591758 star.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
That makes it an early body. Please note that is the body only. No doors, fenders, hood, etc. JUST the body. The serial number of your car places it with a probable build date sometime during March 1940. The two numbers don't appear to coincide: a very early body with a mid-year chassis. The issue remains we have no way of telling how long the body sat around before it was "made into a car". During my research, I took the proverbial deep dive into these plates. There were zero definitive notes, etc. that explained them. Also, some bodies got them, others did not. By the way, numbers stamped INTO the dash panel (aka firewall) were super confusing. Quite scarce and ZERO notes as to why / how / etc. Different assembly plants occasionally did things differently. Not necessarily according to Ford Motor CO. prescribed methods. I had restored a well-documented '40 convertible a few years ago with a factory installed Mercury engine, one of 111 built that way. that car had 99 stamped into the dash panel. That tag, seen in an attached photo is body 4848. To add to that confusion, I had restored a deluxe coupe, also a well-documented Mercury install at the factory that did NOT have 99 stamped. However, it had a body tag that started with PC. Again, no idea why and no answers found in the research center.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". Last edited by Kube; 04-22-2026 at 02:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 5,164
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
My 39 Mercury 4 door, yes. My 39 Mercury Coupe, no. My 40 Mercury 4 door convertible, yes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
Photo is of the '39 wagon I'd restored. From what I understand, tags were for bodies produced FOR Ford, not BY Ford. Of course there are the anomalies like my '40 deluxe coupe. Body built BY Ford. This body tag "thing" was supposed to have been phased out in 1940. Just another wild guess but methinks not all plants got that memo. I never researched Mercury unless there was an overlap to Ford so can't offer much on them.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 5,164
|
AS for the Mercury, it contradicts TerryOH claim of "only" outside suppliers used the body tag and NOT Ford directly....AS My understanding is that the 39 Mercury was the FIRST totally in house produce car by FOMOCO? ie NO Murray or Briggs bodies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
However, there are instances when this did not ring true. I firmly believe we will never have a definitive answer to this.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,394
|
The PC tag is not a typical body number plate that would have been added by an outside supplier.
Last edited by Terry,OH; 04-23-2026 at 07:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
The tag is the exact size & style of the other tags I have witnessed, fastened in the exact location of the others. That particular car was factory built with a Mercury engine. The tag number matches the number on a Telegram to the dealer advising the car was ready to be picked up in Dearborn.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: harpursville ny
Posts: 1,172
|
My 39 deluxe sedan has a stamping under the voltage regulator: 14C 102 CHE. Would love to know its meaning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
They are so rare and as far as I know, no logical sequence to them, well, sadly, I don't believe we will ever be able to clarify exactly what they were for.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,394
|
The PC tag is not of the same style as the typical "body tags" used by outside Mfg. It may have been added by Ford?? I am not aware of every one of the "police " modifications but don't the majority of them seem to be related to the chassis, which was not assembled by outside Mfg. The typical Body tags were attached to the body by the outside Mfg. not by Ford. It is possible the PC body was assembled by Ford. You will note it also does not conform to the number font or the sequence of the numbers which for a typical "Body tag" included the model number before the sequence number.
Last edited by Terry,OH; 04-25-2026 at 07:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
However, this car came from the family of the officer who had ordered it new. There were papers, a lot of them, that proved its provenance. ALL of the paperwork was between the Ford Motor CO. and the dealership with but two exceptions. One? The Telegram from Ford to the dealer stating the car was ready to be picked up in Dearborn with notes as to what was required at that time. That Telegram had the serial number on it. Two? The letter to the dealer from the officer requesting this car to be built. And yes, the only modifications of these special builds that are definitively known was the engine and related parts thereof.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 412
|
Not a 40, our 38 conv had part of a body tag on drivers side firewall, when I got it, I asked Dennis Carpenter if he could make some; he said they did'nt have a tag
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,394
|
Kube: Your saying the tag is not a body tag it is a serial number tag?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,541
|
Quote:
Terry, rest assured I did the proverbial "deep dive" into this when visiting the BFRC. Not a note to be found... As you most likely know, the "program" to get a Mercury engine in 1940 was still kept "quiet" by the Ford Motor CO. It wasn't until 1941 that Ford stopped discouraging this "option".
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you". |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|