Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2023, 10:03 AM   #21
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
Default Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers

Andy's the man!
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2023, 03:15 PM   #22
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
Default Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers

Sheldon,

The photo below is the best that I could provide. This first version of the '33 front cross member with 12" motor mount insulator spacing is in very poor condition. What makes the photo worthwhile are the two added 'extenders' that permitted the use of the later combined water pump/motor mount brackets with the 17" insulator spacing without having to replace the front cross member. They are real and they are Ford parts illustrated in an early '33 Service Letter. I have one in NOS form.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0202(1).jpg (135.8 KB, 77 views)
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-10-2023, 03:52 PM   #23
deuce lover
Senior Member
 
deuce lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rockwall TX
Posts: 6,018
Default Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers

Great.Thanks!!
deuce lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2023, 04:57 PM   #24
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
Default Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers

You're welcome, as always.
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2023, 05:34 PM   #25
petehoovie
Senior Member
 
petehoovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,643
Default Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidG View Post
Sheldon,

The photo below is the best that I could provide. This first version of the '33 front cross member with 12" motor mount insulator spacing is in very poor condition. What makes the photo worthwhile are the two added 'extenders' that permitted the use of the later combined water pump/motor mount brackets with the 17" insulator spacing without having to replace the front cross member. They are real and they are Ford parts illustrated in an early '33 Service Letter. I have one in NOS form.
__________________


petehoovie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2023, 05:42 PM   #26
DavidG
Senior Member
 
DavidG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
Default Re: 1933 vs 1934 Crossmembers

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Pete,


Thanks!
DavidG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.