|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsford NY. USA
Posts: 1,304
|
Hey guys ! What kind of fuel mileage should I expect to get with a ' 37 coupe equipped with a stock , (good condition )'42 59A , '39 trans , 4:11 rear , and 27 in. tall rear tires ? - Thanks in advance !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,087
|
Well, tell us what mileage you are getting and what kind of driving you are doing. In town, highway? Then the folks can chime in and let you know what they think.
You tell us then we will tell you. John |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsford NY. USA
Posts: 1,304
|
Under normal driving conditions around town is approx. 7 . It might be a tad better on the highway , keeping it under 3,000 rpm .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,639
|
7 mpg? Try 2 to 3 times that.
By the way, there is no such thing as a '42 59A.
__________________
Alan |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,087
|
Well, As a comparison: Our 46 4 door with a new rebuilt 59-ab, 3.78 rear, 600:16, (but I have a Mitchell O/D) gets 17/18 mpg on trips. Mostly secondary roads and some interstates (60-65 mph). This is accurate. No exaggeration.
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Above the gnat line in Georgia
Posts: 7,119
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
__________________
Life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer to the end, the faster it goes. It is better to be seen, than viewed. "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm". |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsford NY. USA
Posts: 1,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,639
|
No such thing as a '42 59AB either. The 59 series engines came in 1945.
__________________
Alan |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsford NY. USA
Posts: 1,304
|
Quote:
I also found out in my owners manual that my tank is 14 gal . ( I thought it was 16 ) and did some new calculating . I figure now that I'm getting 10 mpg . Not great , but better than 7 that I originally thought ! I think I'm going to do a gear change . Thanks again - F F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Callahan Fla
Posts: 1,152
|
I would think 15ish is normal. I get around 15 in both my 49 and 41 and I usually have a combination of city and highway. 7 seems low.
__________________
Wanted, a car with a " Dynaflex Superflowing Unijet Turbovasculator which is Syncromeshed to the Multicoil Hydrotensioned Dual vacuum Dynomometer. " |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 9,240
|
10 mpg is a bit heavy for any old Ford. You'd get that from a 59 Caddy. You probably have an over rich condition in the carb. There are many threads on here re 94 carbs and getting them to run right. There may also be other inaccuracies in your calculations. things like fuel leaks, fuel sloshing from the tank on turns, stuff like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange Park, Fl
Posts: 406
|
Definitely change the gear or go with OD. Saves gas and engines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 497
|
It's all in how you treat that long skinny pedal (or the button in the earlier stuff). Also how far you wind out the 1-2 and 2-3 shift. 9 outta 10 over rev antique engines but today's traffic and drivers (no consideration) sometimes demand it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 18,018
|
Based on standard gearing and tire sizes, if the engine is in good tune, the carb has no internal leakage, and the ignition vacuum retard system is functioning correctly, you should get near 12 to 14 MPG driving around town a lot on the stop & go side with no jack rabbit starts. 17 to 19 mpg should be close on the highway if you have good gearing for the highway. Overdrive will get you there easily but a 3.78:1 ratio without OD will be on the low MPG side due to the higher engine rpm at current highway speeds. A 3.55:1 ratio can do the job as long as the transmission gearing is set up for that ratio. The size an weight of the vehicle plus the tire size all have an effect on the mileage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,208
|
I used to think I got only 10/12 mpg until I serviced and calibrated the speedometer. I had been able to get the speedo fairly close using a different sending gear but then it wasnt recording the mileage properly. Now with the odometer reading correctly milage figures out to around 20 running a 3:54 rear end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,443
|
I think you are calculating based on size of the tank vs. gauge reading (i.e., 1/2 tank = 8 gallons)? The only accurate way is to fill it, keep track of miles, and refill it to the same level (based on gas pump shutting off or by looking thru the filler) and noting mileage.
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
I'm not sure what tank size (capacity) has to do with figuring gas mileage. The problem may be not knowing how to calculate mileage? Fill the tank up and record the mileage, drive it until the fuel level is down to say 1/2 or 1/4 tank, refill it and record the mileage. The difference in the mileage divided by the amount of gas to refill the tank will give you the MPG. The size of the tank is not a factor in calculating MPG. Also, any one check of MPG is just a single test point. You need to check it over time and find the average. As stated above, you also need to check your speedometer for correct calibration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
|
I have a 39 Ford coupe with a stock 40 or 41 engine (dual exhaust) and 4.11 rear axle.
No large tires. I get about 17 MPG. No hard driving, etc., no overdrive. A different axle ratio would be better, but I'm too old and lazy to make the change |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsford NY. USA
Posts: 1,304
|
Quote:
Thanks for your reply - F F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wheaton, IL near Chicago
Posts: 861
|
You are guessing at how many gallons you are using.
Figuring half a tank is 8 gallons or half a tank is 7 gallons is not close enough. Fill the tank to FULL either by the nozzle shutting off or by sight in the filler neck. Drive a fixed number of miles. Refill the tank to the same level as before...this will tell you EXACTLY how many gallons you used withou guessing "was it 8 or was it 7....?" |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|