|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Snohomish,WA
Posts: 1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,777
|
Quote:
http://www.zddplus.com/TechBrief12%2...20Break-in.pdf
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) ![]() "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness Last edited by Old Henry; 03-28-2012 at 01:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
. Here are my constructive thoughts having read many threads on other boards.Interesting article...I am using oil #17 (Chevron Delo 15-40 400 LE) in my flathead and plan to use it in my Chevy muscle cars this summer to forego adding Zinc for flat tappet cams. Recent articles point to potential for spalling of iron from high levels of additive. A friend is a Chevron employee and recommended this oil as he uses it for his "fleet". I tried 10-30 as suggested here but was uncomfortable with what I presume was higher levels of valvetrain noise. Zinc levels are adequate at 1268 for my flat tappet cars and overkill for flatties I suspect..but what I found interesting was this oil's Ho Hum rating as calcium/detergent levels are low at 1593 and TBN low at 7.82. However the author indicates the TBN levels are high for a passenger car! I then compared to Valvoline conventional API SM/SL 10-30 which has similar levels of Calcium levels at 1620 for autos. I'm not sure how the oxidation inhibitors the author mentions affect this oil for auto use. Summary: Whats ho hum for diesels may be adequate for autos.... Lane |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|