|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: I'm in Texas Y'all!
Posts: 261
|
For a 1959 with Drums all around, do I need the fancy distribution block, or can I just use a simple distribution block?
WHen I purchased the car, it had a later model MC and unknown PB with unknown distribution block. The MC looks like a Disc/Drum unit, and I'm assuming the distribution block was also for Disc/Drum (I'm assuming all the brake parts were scavenged from a single donor vehicle). I'm retrofitting the brake system with a new aftermarket PB and Drum/Drum MC. My question is can I dump the existing distribution block and use this older style simple distribution block? I have some #10 residual valves that I'll use when I replumb the brake lines. Here's the distribution block that was on the car: Here's the 'simple' distribution block I am thinking of using. It came of a 1970 Maverick with drums at all 4 corners. I have a new "later-style" distribution block that I can use, but I'm thinking I do not need it if the simple block from the Meverick would be a better fit for my car. Incidentally, here's the old setup that was on the car: Closeup of old distribution block: |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent, WA. Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,765
|
Just my 2 cents. The old single masters had the brakes balanced in the design. So a “distribution” block is fine. A lot the the more modern ones used “combination” valves. Some had metering for brake balance. They all look alike, but they aren’t.
I use separate residual valves, and when needed an adjustable proportioning valve. Then I know what I’ve got. So if the one you use is just a block, fine. And check if there’s already residual valves in the new dual master. A lot had them, and typically they can be removed. But you don’t need 2 in the same line. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: I'm in Texas Y'all!
Posts: 261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 903
|
Look into the outlet ports. Those with the residual will have a "fitting" looking thing in the port. Those without the fitting will look into the revisor.
__________________
Bill, certified Ford nut. 2024 F-150 2018 Lincoln MKZ 2016 Focus 1961 Comet S-22 1956 Ford Crown Victoria 36 Chevy, 351C/FMX, 8", Mustang II |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent, WA. Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,765
|
Just pick one, they’re pretty typical. Google will bring up videos
“remove residual valve from master cylinder” |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: I'm in Texas Y'all!
Posts: 261
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks for all the replies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Granger (Northern) Indiana
Posts: 1,611
|
Quote:
Your original distribution block is an early disc/drum combination valve including proportioning and metering, and the "new" one you pictured is a later version of the same valve, and neither should be used on a drum/drum system. The Maverick distribution block you show has two issues- old age, and the dash warning light switch. It would be much better to simply use a new brass tee for the fronts, with the residuals first plumbed close the the master cylinder. IF you intend to wire a warning light, buy a NEW block and switch, not the 60+ year old hydraulic brake part. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|