|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 12
|
What is the correct model #? It has the windshield visor,arched upper door window frames and the 3rd window does not open. I,m helping my friend finish his A but he now has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's and now has forgotten. It is a Canadian built car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 210
|
Let's see a picture. Vertical windshield or a slanted and no outside visor are items that a picture will clear up real fast.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 12
|
With a visor the windshield is not slanted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,503
|
__________________
No one wants advice - only corroboration. -John Steinbeck |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,385
|
I suspect that the Model "A" in question is 1 155-C Murray Town Sedan. A picture of the car would be helpful.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 18,011
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
As was mentioned, the visor was deleted on the slant windshield designs so none of them were produced that way by Ford or the subcontractors for production. Straight windshield models were produced in 1931 until the change over to the new design. This is not to say that someone couldn't have installed one after production. Folks did modify there cars with accessories and aftermarket parts over time. Last edited by rotorwrench; 05-31-2025 at 10:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 2,900
|
1929-early 1931 three-window sedans not only differed in the upper window lines (Murray being arched as mentioned, Briggs being straight across), the doors on the Murray Sedans are the same width, while the Briggs doors were unequal there. The Briggs rear doors are noticeably narrower than the front doors.
Marshall |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 12
|
Thanks, it was a basic 4dr. ( no cowl lights) & the I interior dome light was in the center of the headliner so I suspect 165c is more fitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 18,011
|
I would concur with that assessment. The plain Jane Murray Fordor 3-window for 1930/31 was the 165C. They are still very nice cars and only are missing a few items by comparison. This would simplify restoration but only a little.
Canadian Fords are not a lot different that the US made cars. Robertson head screws and the Canadian serial numbers are some of the differences. There are likely a few more differences but I'm not well versed on the Canadian built cars. Last edited by rotorwrench; 06-01-2025 at 11:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,385
|
A 165-C Standard is a scarce car these days as most of the standards have been restored as deluxe models.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|