|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,976
|
Hello everyone. I have noticed two different roof designs on the 1941-1948 Ford and Mercury long door coupes. My car has a droop rail that sweeps all the way to the trunk opening and has a softer transition between the back window and trunk opening. I have seen a few coupes with a drip rail that stops abruptly at a 45 degree angle and has a sharp line across the back of the roof, between the rear window and trunk lid. Does anyone know why the differences between these two? Did Mercury have the different roof over ford?
![]()
__________________
Thee Inland Emperors |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: melb, aus
Posts: 143
|
Not sure why... but there is a slight profile difference in the body.
This is 1941. The sedan coupe having a real rear seat, not just the jump/opera seats. ![]() -tony.
__________________
tony-starr.com |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,801
|
It also looks like the door is longer on the sedan coupe (bottom illustration).
Sal |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: melb, aus
Posts: 143
|
Further to this, I thought the Mercury only had longer front sheet metal over the Ford - but I could be wrong.
-
__________________
tony-starr.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,976
|
Both cars I pictured are sedan coupes
__________________
Thee Inland Emperors |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: melb, aus
Posts: 143
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Any one else know more before I dig through my books? -
__________________
tony-starr.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lower Hutt , New Zealand
Posts: 2,167
|
If you talking about the drip rails it was the 41 club coupe or coupe sedan than has the drip rail drop strait down to the top of the deck while the same coupes for 42 -48 curved down to give a smoother more integrated line. both are the long door coupes. The bodies have the same profile but the way the drip rail flows creates a sort of optical illusion. pictured L to R 41,42,46,47,48 coupes all long door.
GB
__________________
"you can't make honey out of dog sh*t" "You're a long time looking at the lid" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: melb, aus
Posts: 143
|
Thanks Graeme, that makes more sense now - the 2nd photo Chris posted is a 41.
Below is the different body styles in the 41-48 book.
__________________
tony-starr.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lower Hutt , New Zealand
Posts: 2,167
|
Actually taking a second look there appears to be a definate crease where actual roof meets the deck on the 41 that appears to be absent on the 42 -48. I've never really noticed that before.
GB
__________________
"you can't make honey out of dog sh*t" "You're a long time looking at the lid" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt. Holly,NJ
Posts: 1,822
|
When I was in High School I had a 1941 business coupe and the roof sloped into the panel above the trunk lid with no crease. A friend had a 1941 club coupe with the full back seat and it had the crease. It seemed that post war club coupes did not have a crease. About a year ago I saw a 1946 club coupe at a show and it had the crease. I don't know any details of that car, it may have been an early model. Mercurys used the Ford bodies from 1941 and up. Only the front sheet metal from the cowl forward was unique to the Mercury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,976
|
Thanks for the info so far guys. Sounds like it may be an "early vs late" type of deal. I am glad my 46 has the softer transition, I think they look a little better (no offence to anyone with the earlier style body)
__________________
Thee Inland Emperors |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,976
|
After looking online, I have found several 1942 Fords with the full length rain gutter...so maybe the "early vs late" theory is not right if there are 1946's with both roof designs? Anyone else have any insight?
__________________
Thee Inland Emperors |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lithia, FL
Posts: 1,098
|
I really think it was a design enhancement to smooth out the transition for the 42 models and up. Every photo of the 41 Ford & Mercury Club Coupes to include the ones I have seen at car shows have the crease and abrupt end to the rain gutter. As Chris had mentioned, I too do not mean any offense for the owners of these models. I think they all look great.
__________________
If it aint broke, don't fix it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 2
|
I recently purchased an all original barn find 1941 business coupe with the short door. The roof line flows into the trunk as opposed to the crease over the trunk. The business coupe did not need the head room for the passenger in the back seat nor the larger door to access the back seat. The rear side windows on the club coupe open for ventilation on the club coupe. If you look at the pictures of the two you have more head room for the passengers in the back seat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Albion, PA
Posts: 1,100
|
[ATTACH][ATTACH][ATTACH]1941 ford 3.jpg[/ATTACH][/ATTACH][/ATTACH]
Steves46 is correct in my experience. Attached photos are of a 1941 Super Deluxe sedan coupe a friend of mine brought home yesterday. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Albion, PA
Posts: 1,100
|
1941 ford 4.jpg
Shot of the roof rail (gutter). |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,643
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,643
|
1942
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Albion, PA
Posts: 1,100
|
The 1942 Ford body parts book shows a 21A P/N (1942) prefix for the roof panel assembly so I'm confident it is different than 1941.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|