|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,272
|
itslow>>>Imagine how much floor space would be consumed if the cranks were stored horizontally.>>>
OK, I imagine they wouldn't take up that much space if horizontally nested or just piled in a mountain of cranks in a corner somewhere. Carefully of course. And also no higher than the yield point of the cranks at the very bottom of the pile. 8^) Jack E/NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 9,239
|
Ford wouldn't have had the cranks around for very long. They would have been into cars and out the door in very little time. I'm terrible for storage, I just let 'em lie on the shelf.
Mart. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cos Cob, CT
Posts: 295
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cos Cob, CT
Posts: 295
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oakdale,Ca
Posts: 1,323
|
Do a Google Search for "locomotive crankshaft storage", the click on Google Images, first one I saw was of about 5 Locomotive cranks stored horizontally, and only supported on/near the ends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North of sandy ago, CA.
Posts: 2,080
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Bruce
__________________
Works good Lasts long time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 792
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() How about one from a ship? ![]() Sizes are increased compared to an automobile, but the concept and principles are the same.
__________________
Mike Wanted: - '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info - ARDUN parts |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oakdale,Ca
Posts: 1,323
|
My point is they don't seem to be concerned with the crank deflection
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,272
|
>>>itslow>>>
Bet my crank is bigger than your's. Looks like each big end in this photo gets it's own oil puddle. Jack E/NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 220
|
I saw that ship engine crankshaft too. The crankshaft weighs 300 tons. 38 bore x 98 inch stroke. 7790 HP for each of the 14 cylinders. I'd like to see the machine that grinds that crank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 792
|
Please refer to the thread "Gravity bends a crank?":
https://fordbarn.com/forum/showpost.p...&postcount=141
__________________
Mike Wanted: - '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info - ARDUN parts |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hertford (UK)
Posts: 905
|
EUREKA ! next time they send a space shuttle up, pack in a bunch of crankshafts! If a man can float in air, so can a crankshaft.....can't it ?
BUT..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 229
|
What you need to do is keep all the warped ones is case of VAPOR LOCK LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 317
|
how do we know the shafts didn't have any runout when stored ?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|