![]() |
59a - or 59ab Is there any way to tell if a 59A on the heads and block is 3-1/16 or 3-3/16? Just stare at it I guess. Walt
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab pencil test?
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Only way is to remove the head and measure the bore.
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab I never trust what the heads say, most have been swapped around over the years. The only sure thing is that you'll know what the heads are. I know I'm not telling you anything you don't already know Walt :)
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Quote:
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab The 41A block (has 59 on bell & was 221 replacement block beginning in 1944) does have characteristics of the prewar 221 engines but I haven't yet studied one to see how close they are. It would be interesting to note these differences.
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab I have a block on my stand that's '59' and 221 cu in, 3 1/16. Heads are still off. I could get good pics if I knew what to shoot or measure.
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Quote:
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Walt,
The small bore 59's pass the pencil test, not seen one that didn't pass. Martin. |
Re: 59a - or 59ab Quote:
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab I'd sure like to see one of the 41A blocks so I could be sure for my own information but some folks say they are very much like the prewar 221 blocks and have thin cylinder walls like they were using the prewar cores in the post war core box. I hope someone comes up with one to photograph for the block ID thread some day. It would be nice to know what all the true characteristics are.
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab OK, so what's the pencil test?
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Its my understanding that if a pencil will lay on the block just above the timing cover that its a '40 221 block. I have one in my stack.
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab That's what it is. The post war engines had a different design on the front of the block so there is no pronounced flange there for the timing cover. The timing cover itself it all that protrudes there. Prewar engines had a bit of flange protrusion making for a pretty good step in that location.
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab An other difference, I built a 59 engine a couple years ago for a 35 pickup, it had a rear oil slinger rather than a rope seal. I used an 8BA crank and rods with the 59 aluminum seal. Never so that before. Walt
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Quote:
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab Just went down to the shop and looked at the timing cover area. There is no way a pencil could sit there if the timing cover wasn't on. It just slopes down to nothing. The bell housing has a '59' cast on top. Don't recall what the cyl heads were, but it's 3 1/16 for sure... .060 over. Has a tag from rebuilder ford authorized which reflects the specs of the engine. Not sure if that helps.....
|
Re: 59a - or 59ab I've not seen any blocks with just 59 on the bell housing that passed the pencil test - only the early blocks (pre-war). I'm not saying they don't exist - just never seen one.
Usually when a see a block with just the 59 on the bell, my hunch is that it will be a 3 1/16 bore block (replacement) - just the way I've seen most of them over the years. |
Re: 59a - or 59ab Gonna have to check the 59 block I have stashed, my reply about the pencil test was from memory, so could be bolox. It is a mish mash of pre and post war casting box's.
I'll check and report back. Martin. |
Re: 59a - or 59ab The pencil test is to exclude the 59 block not to confirm it.The pencil test works on the first generation 24 stud blocks,late '38,39 and 40 41.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.