Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit 2 Attachment(s)
I'm looking for feedback as I've developed the setup in the photos.
I'm trying to get some idea of interest/demand. My estimation on selling price is $750-850. (The detail of the wheel lugs is not set in stone as the ones pictured are obsolete Dorman and I'm talking to ARP about something as an alternate, hence the price guesstimate) You'd receive what's in the 1st photo, less the hub, which I've shown only for illustration that you'd use your original drum hubs. Front disc brake kit, 1948-52 Ford F-1 pickup Features four-piston fixed calipers and 11” diameter 0.88” thick rotors. Retains the factory 5x5.5 bolt pattern and utilizes the original drum brake hubs. Wheelsmith 15” rims work fine and I suspect that the OE 15” rim will also work. Vehicle total front track width comes out at 1/4” less than factory specification. Steering wheel lock to lock turn specification is the same as factory. Calipers are a tried & true Kelsey Hayes design. Caliper attachment bolts, rotors and wheel studs are all OE application items. |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit All new parts? What master cylinder & other components is required or do you recommend.
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Just curious why you would not use a rotor with integral hub assembly from a later Ford pickup and use bearings that will work on the early spindle. It would eliminate using the original hub? Not being critical of all your work, but just curious.
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
I've had a '68 Mustang dual chamber master on my truck for awhile, so I'll be using that when I start trialing the kit. Those are a 1" bore. I've looked at the original master and the way it's designed and plumbed. I have no way to test it, but my kit may work ok with it as well. Those are 1 1/16" bore. There's always a chance the A0A-2178-A residual check valve inside the factory master cylinder may cause too much line pressure (and make disc calipers drag too much) as it's intended for drum brakes..... but I have no way to verify. Excepting the master cylinder itself, what you see in the photo is everything you would need to run to get from front drum to front disc. |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
rotor assembly having the correct bearing spacing and running the correct bearings that dimensionally also fit those spindles is probably a pretty long shot. (let alone all the other specs to use a 4 piston caliper, etc.) Wilwood side-steps the issue by using a custom hub.... |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Talk to us about that unique sway bar and linkage peeking though the installation photo! At least I assume that's what it is...
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit 2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Looks like a neat setup. Just a detail but the factory bolt pattern is 5 on 5-1/2". I know it's only a typo but people will expect no errors in that area.
I like the fact that there is no increase in track width. Mart. |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
Kind of an apples to oranges comparison. Just looking casually- Fixed calipers always outshine sliding calipers in terms of performance and pad longevity. Use of bearing adapters displays a lack of technical expertise akin to trying to cram round pegs into square holes. And rubber brake hoses..... we're not even going there. And where the "rubber meets the road," I've heard from a user of that kit that after replacing the cheap bearings provided, he was up $100. He also had to chuck his spindles in the lathe and knurl them and "glue" the bearing adapters into place as well. Speedway's kit might appear more economical, but what's the real price of installation? |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Will the 1" bore MC provide good braking power without a booster? It is my understanding that a 7/8" will give an easier pedal effort, but require more travel. Also, have you determined if the residual valve will keep pressure on the rotors? In other words is this mustang MC for a model with non-boosted discs up front? Sounds like keeping Henry's hub is a good way to go without a glued on adapter.
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
I would say the increase in pedal movement toward the floor is very slight when compared to the pedal you experience with the original 1 1/16" bore master. Personally, I wouldn't go down further in bore size to a 7/8" though. The 1" Mustang master I'm using is for 4 wheel drum manual brake application. It has the residual valves in both ports. There's a chance it will operate and do the job just fine with the residual valve in place. The height of the master and the height of the caliper are pretty close.... close enough that you probably want some residual fluid control in the line to the front brakes. Whether the 1" master's residual valve provides too much pressure on the calipers is the question. That I will determine. |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Have you driven your F-1 with this setup on the front, and the stock drums on the rear? How is the F/R balance? I would think with 4 pistons the front might give much more squeeze than the rears at any given pedal pressure.
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
The early style K/H calipers will work OK, but modern aluminum 4-piston designs would be a better choice, imo. I agree with not going any smaller than a 1" master, but simply using a disc/drum master cylinder would solve the residual issue, and provide safer and correct disc fluid reservoir volume. If you are "intent" on using the drum drum master, use an easy-out to pull the disc axle tube seat, remove the residual assembly and reinstall the seat. The drum brake residuals should not be used on disc brakes! :) |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
a nice front disc kit out with humongous aluminum calipers, (and huge rotors), that not only needs careful measuring to make sure they clear wheels, but looks fairly out of place and is wretched overkill in my opinion. The lack of something sensible, that fit my new Wheelsmith rims is what started this odyssey. I'll try the drum/drum master as it is, since it's already on the truck. If I need to pull the one residual valve out of the port. I'll cross that bridge when I get to it. I may be able to go with no residual or a 2# unit..... we shall see. Thank you for your comments. |
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Maybe you could market your anti- sway bar deal. As you noted, no coverage in the aftermarket for 42 to 52 half ton to three quarter ton commercials. Rears yes, fronts no. Just saying...
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit Quote:
|
Re: Informal poll - 1948-52 F-1 Front Disc Kit 1 Attachment(s)
'48-52 Ford F-1 front disc kit completed. It was a "wash" AFA weight difference between 11" drum & 11" disc,
(38# a side for the drum setup I took off and 40# for the disc I installed.... 2# weight penalty goes to the disc, roughly the weight of the pads) Stops like a big dog now, no pulling and no squealing. Pads are EBC red. Front to rear bias required a slight adjustment of my Speedway compact proportioning valve; which wouldn't have been necessary with less aggressive front pads. I'm probably not going to market this kit; my market survey results didn't support going that way. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.