|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-08-2021, 08:02 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Centerville, Iowa
Posts: 91
|
Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Had my engine rebuilt, new bearings, balanced crank, high lift cam, lightened flywheel, v8 clutch, bigger intake valves, high compression head. I have about 200 miles on it now. Starter would hardly turn the engine over to start it, so I took it to a reputable shop that rebuilds starters. He put a new armature in it, and thought it was good to go. I installed it, and it will start it, but still turns over very slow. I installed a new start switch, cleaned the surfaces where the starter bolts to the engine, new battery, new cables, grounded from the battery to the frame, and to the transmission. About all I can do to turn it over with the crank. Do I just need to drive it some more and wait for it to break-in?
|
05-08-2021, 08:54 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Fort Gratiot, Michigan
Posts: 2,296
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Do you have the proper size battery cable ? I use double ought ( 00 )!
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
05-08-2021, 10:49 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,496
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Mike, Your last sentence tells me you know what you should do with it. As you ay, It will free-up with use so use it. That's what they were made for.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood. |
05-09-2021, 09:49 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,100
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Also check that you have a good ground path for our starter. After the engine and starter rebuild, both are probably beautifully painted to the point where there's little bare metal contact between the starter and engine. Scrape off some paint behind the starter bolt ears and where they bolt to the engine to get a good ground.
|
05-09-2021, 10:02 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,046
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
If it's that hard to turn over I would surmise that whoever assembled that engine didn't know what they were doing. It shouldn't be that tight.
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!. Got my education out behind the barn! |
05-09-2021, 10:35 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Grants Pass, Oregon
Posts: 79
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
05-09-2021, 10:43 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: (Old)Shasta (Redding) CA
Posts: 385
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
A Model A requires more piston clearance than a modern car.
Years alo I had a engine re-bored at a local shop. They gave the pistons about 4 thousands clearance. When warm the engine was very tight for a long time.
__________________
Connoisseur of Rust |
05-09-2021, 11:46 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: St. Augustine, Fl.
Posts: 437
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Could be timing, high compression head, clearances, or needs breaking-in.
John
__________________
IN GOD WE TRUST - SEMPER FIDELIS John |
05-09-2021, 06:18 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Centerville, Iowa
Posts: 91
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Thanks for all the ideas. I did clean the area where the starter meets the bell housing, and I made my own battery cables out of welding cable so I could put a disconnect switch in. I think just driving it is the solution. Thanks again!
|
05-09-2021, 07:06 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 640
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
NOT Your Problem but..... careless assembly using three 'too long' starter bolts that will lock against the flywheel has caused many unnecessary engine removals to re check motor clearances that where correct.....
|
05-09-2021, 11:02 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South California
Posts: 6,188
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Quote:
‘high compression” head How high compression ? |
|
05-10-2021, 09:48 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,599
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Quote:
You might jumper the terminals on the disconnect switch with a heavy cable like a jumper cable and see if it cranks faster. Last edited by Benson; 05-14-2021 at 09:37 AM. |
|
05-10-2021, 06:16 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 382
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
I would either disconnect one side of the cutoff switch and bolt it to the side on disconnect switch or a jumper cable across the cutoff switch.
|
05-10-2021, 07:19 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,903
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Mike, It sounds like you are doing all the right things. My only suggestion is to check the voltage at the starter terminal when cranking the engine over. That will tell you a lot. Maybe you need a new battery.
__________________
A is for apple, green as the sky. Step on the gas, for tomorrow I die. Forget the brakes, they really don't work. The clutch always sticks, and starts with a jerk. My car grows red hair, and flies through the air. Driving's a blast, a blast from the past. |
05-10-2021, 08:06 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bismarck ND
Posts: 1,189
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
If you can barely turn it over with the crank, It is too tight. I just worked on one that had one rod at less than .0005" and it was too much for the starter. It had just been rebuilt by a big name rebuilder. One shim solved the problem.
|
05-11-2021, 04:07 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Centerville, Iowa
Posts: 91
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Thanks for the ideas! I will check the disconnect switch, and voltage. 6 to 1 high compression head. I will try those ideas, and post again. Thanks! Mike
|
05-11-2021, 11:02 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Shawnee, Ok
Posts: 3,471
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Rod clearance is critical, as stated, even one shim can make a world of difference.
__________________
Keith Shawnee OK '31 SW 160-B |
05-12-2021, 07:55 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Fenton Michigan
Posts: 43
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
I had the same issue, same rebuild configuration as you have.
After the first 500 miles it was much better. After 1K it now starts great. During the first 500 miles I was a bit careful on where I parked, hoping to get a roll and bump start. I also kept the idle up a bit to prevent stalling, and having to push it to the side of the road. |
05-12-2021, 08:26 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
When i got the optima battery my car cranked faster, fast enough that i was accused of converting to 12V ---what battery do you have and how old is it?
originally with the first engine rebuild on my car the starter had trouble, loosened up after 500-700 miles, then it got loose enough to knock at 3000 miles |
05-12-2021, 10:16 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,046
|
Re: Starter not quite up to the task after rebuild
Quote:
Also, another item often overlooked is ring end gap. Not enough gap on even one ring is enough to make an engine overly stiff, especially when hot.
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!. Got my education out behind the barn! |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|