03-24-2013, 09:07 PM | #121 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Lincoln Park
Posts: 80
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
What's a Chevy? Isn't that the actor from national lampoons?
|
03-24-2013, 09:53 PM | #122 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlanta, Michigan
Posts: 236
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
I preferred nailheads back in the late 50's - 60's. All my buddies were running small blocks in everything. I had a nailhead in a 49 Hudson & a 51 Mercury. Run the into the ground. :-)
I also preferred flatheads back then, but did better on the street with the nailheads. PS I'm running a flathead, a y-block and a 350 in different vehicles right now. Butch |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-24-2013, 09:58 PM | #123 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Utica, MI
Posts: 361
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Quote:
As my truck sits it is set-up to run whatever engine I can fit. Some days I really want to shove a 302 in it because since it has been hacked up already I am going through a ton of work to put a Flathead back in. In any regard, I'm on quite a few different forums for a few very different vehicles and there is usually a section for putting an SBC in stuff. |
|
03-24-2013, 10:20 PM | #124 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,641
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Replace fuel pump & filter:
El Camino = 3 hours Any flathead = 1/4 hour Replace spark plugs: El Camino = 3 hours Anyt flathead = 1/4 hour Replace El Camino = take it please Replace any flathead = not gonna happen
__________________
Alan |
03-24-2013, 10:58 PM | #125 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Waddell, AZ
Posts: 2,540
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
hmmmm, what year El Camino??...lol....Mike
|
03-25-2013, 12:18 AM | #126 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oxford New Zealand
Posts: 177
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
03-25-2013, 06:49 AM | #127 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 78
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
If you don't understand a Flathead buy a Honda
__________________
Dick C Erie, PA 1996 Exploder 1952 Ford F2 (Driver) 1948 Ford F1 Panel (Frame off resto-rod) 1946 Ford Coupe (Basket case) |
03-25-2013, 07:09 AM | #128 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,509
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Let us not forget adjusting the valves once a week in the garbage truck engine. A 221 will run fast enough to kill you and keep pace on the highway. All the other junk is good for is bragging rights.
|
03-25-2013, 07:30 AM | #129 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
I'm glade I didn't put my nose in this stupid thread, woooppp, what did I do, dame. Walt
|
03-25-2013, 07:53 AM | #130 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 583
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Is "sacrilege" the correct word? Probably. Put the shoe on the other foot and let's see what happens. Transplant a Ford heart into brand x vehicles en masse and you'll hear plenty of moans.
|
03-25-2013, 09:09 AM | #131 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montgomery, NY & Port St. Lucie Florida
Posts: 935
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
In general, once the 265 Chevy was readily available from junkyards Hot Rodders driving Flatheads began swapping Chevies into their Ford cars. The Chevy came stock with close to 60+ horsepower over the ford flathead. Adapter kits were cheap and the Chevy went in with minor mods to the chassis/body. Speed parts were also reasonable. A 265 Chevy with a 4 barrel, headers and mild cam would make a lot more power than a comparably equipped flathead. Looks or Brand loyalty had nothing to do with the decision. I remember in 1954 watching some Hot Rodders swapping a Merc flathead into a Ford just because it was 15hp more. Guys would kill for 60 horse more.
__________________
Early Ford Lock & Key Service http://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=46583 |
03-25-2013, 03:27 PM | #132 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 334
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Check this out
__________________
[QUO[/QUOTE]no matter where you are,or where you're at, there you are... |
03-25-2013, 03:40 PM | #133 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelbyville TN
Posts: 174
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
Two comments about this topic-------
1. You can install a SBF into a 36 to 40 Ford. You need to pay attention to components like use of the short water pump and use of an electric pusher fan instead of a mechanical fan. A true rear sump oil pan is required if using the original suspension/crossmember. My 40 sedan uses a 289/C4 and it fits without any alteration to the frame, X-member or firewall. 2. The real reason most early Fords used the SBC instead of the SBF is that the GM engine was smaller, ran cooler and would run circles around the Y block engine. By the time Ford brought out a good small block, it was around 1966 and the die was already cast for the SBC. |
03-25-2013, 07:06 PM | #134 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,770
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
hears what i say. if you live in a place where there is light trafic the flathead is fine .but put it in heavy trafic were it could take a hour to go three miles the flathead will proulbey overheat. a sb chevy with the big ford rad will not over heat. so i think where you live has a lot to do with eng choice .plus if done right the flathead can be put back in if you want with no proulbem. i know there are guys that say the flathead if done right woun,t over heat. these guys have never been on the l.i.e. on sunday night in the summer.
|
03-25-2013, 07:14 PM | #135 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange Park, Fl
Posts: 406
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
[/QUOTE]The real reason most early Fords used the SBC instead of the SBF is that the GM engine was smaller, ran cooler and would run circles around the Y block engine. By the time Ford brought out a good small block, it was around 1966 and the die was already cast for the SBC.[/QUOTE]
Obviously from some one who never ran a 265 or 283 against a Y-Block. I will concede that with the introduction of the 327 and more so the 350, the Y-Block was doomed. Prior to that there was no doubt that a decent 272, 292 or 312 was not to be denied. The home made 301 or 302cid Chevy(same thing) ran well, but still no match for a well built 312. Comparing a 327 or 350 against the Y is not a fair fight considering technology advances by the time they were produced('62), the size advantage, and the fact that Ford stopped developing the Y long prior('57). |
03-25-2013, 07:18 PM | #136 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hat City (Danbury CT)
Posts: 647
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
There isn't any debate ........Flathead Rule ....
__________________
"I can't cry as long as I know the Lord has risen " |
03-25-2013, 07:34 PM | #137 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Posts: 789
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
I cannot count how many Ford flathead engine us young fellas pulled out of those Ford cars and threw them in the scrap heap. That was in the late 50s early 60s and very few people wanted a flathead ford engine in their heap. It was Chevy, Olds, Buick, anything but a Ford.
Now I have a 34 P/U and a 35 Coupe and both have souped up Ford flatheads in them. A few years ago I discovered a set of Navarro heads in my barn that I wrapped up and put away in 1963. Isn't that something? I go to a show or a drive-in and people trip over those 350/350s to get a look at my old flatheads......... |
03-25-2013, 07:58 PM | #138 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Santa Fe Springs, California
Posts: 280
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
If you have a Ford use the Ford engine. If you have a Mercury use the Mercury engine. If you don't want the Flat head Ford v8 I will take it. If you got a Chevrolet car put a Chevrolet engine in it. It is true 1932 engine mounts bolt to a small block Chevrolet. That being said, I would love to make a hot rod Lincoln v12 in a gow job.
__________________
I am a believer |
03-26-2013, 04:23 AM | #139 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange Park, Fl
Posts: 406
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
I have nothing against SBC. I have raced them in roundy-rounds with success along with Mercury, Ford, Buick and Pontiac. I have had several Chebbies including my 1st 3 cars that were '56 Bel Air, '55 Bel Air, '61 Corvair, and several others including a '67 Camaro and a '94 Camaro. No complaints. SBC's are great little packages. That said, if I had a Chevy today, it would have a really cool 348, 409 or built up 6. Anything prior to '55 would have nothing but a six. Because SBC's are so common and in every thing from VW's to Jaguars, I don't want one.
Oh, you do? Great have at it and enjoy. There are lots of cool Chevies you can put it in. One of the great things about doing Fords is that there is such a wide selection of engines to opt for. I have an FE in an Edsel, a Y-Block in a '55 and a flathead in a '51 Vicky. I love each and every one and all of their peculiarities. |
03-26-2013, 06:46 AM | #140 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 361
|
Re: Ford Flathead vs small block chevy debate!
I love my old Fords, some with a chevy some with a flathead......just sit back and enjoy the style and good looks ........and keep on trucking.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|