03-26-2021, 11:46 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
|
Re: Flathead Cams
The Navarro seem to have larger chamber volumes than many other choices so you may not have an interference problem. Look at pages #4 and #12:
https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showpost.php?p=23873&postcount=1 Looking for someone to comment on how close the four cams I compared are. The Mercury being the least aggressive. Glenn Last edited by glennpm; 03-28-2021 at 06:21 AM. |
03-26-2021, 02:31 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,484
|
Re: Flathead Cams
Since I've had good luck with the Crower regrind that mimics the Isky 88 I'm going down that path.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-26-2021, 10:16 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,834
|
Re: Flathead Cams
Good choice!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
03-27-2021, 09:33 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
|
Re: Flathead Cams
The only way to compare camshafts and other aftermarket Power adders is: to run them all under similar conditions. To pick a cam with similar numbers, use the one with the most area under the graph. Usually +/- 30degrees. The 1007B would win that comparison due to the quicker lift rate. Now thid is allot of BS fore most people and you choose the one you lie best, and that works for me.
Gramps |
03-27-2021, 11:41 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
|
Re: Flathead Cams
Thanks Ron
|
03-27-2021, 01:26 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 1,664
|
Re: Flathead Cams
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|