03-06-2015, 03:20 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,593
|
Flat o matic.
I have here a flat o matic kit, came out of a car that's having a brand X monkey motion thing slapped in it. Now I didn't remove it, the bloke putting the wrong engine in did, I have the torque converter, bell housing and flex plate (not sure if you guys call it a flex plate, if not it's the chap with the starter ring around its edge), I've read the flatomatic installation stuff and it mentions a spacer that may be needed twix the crank flange and flex plate, anybody know the thickness of said spacer? I can then make him up ready for if I need it.
Many thanks, Martin. |
03-06-2015, 03:44 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,436
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Hopefully some one on here will pipe up if they have one of these kits. If not, you might go on the Flat-O web site and contact them via e-mail. Since you are out of the USA, it might be easier than figuring the time differential to call them.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-06-2015, 04:14 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 147
|
Re: Flat o matic.
If there is to much distance from the flexplate to the torque converter is will take the splines out of the pump. Place the converter all the way back into the pump. Measure the distance from the converter to the flexplate. (when flexplate is mounted with no spacer between the plate and the crank) If I remember right, it should be no more than 3/16 between the converter and the flexplate. If more than that, the pump could possibly not work. You can shim the crank to flexplate to close the gap. I guess you could add shims (washers) between the plate and the converter and do the same thing.
|
03-06-2015, 04:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Buchanan, MI
Posts: 676
|
Re: Flat o matic.
I have in storage a Flatomatic C4 kit . Without looking, I remember the spacers if needed went between the crank flange & the flexplate (flywheel). They are only needed if the flexplate rubs on the COVER of the oil pump drive gear. Not very thick.
If you find that you need specific numbers I could dig them out. Buy the way, I would sell my un-used kit. |
03-06-2015, 06:00 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Poulsbo, WA.
Posts: 356
|
Re: Flat o matic.
You can reach Gene Benson, the owner of Flat-O Products on his site [email protected] or his phone number in Salem, Oregon. 503-364-2934
I have installed 2 of these kits and the spacer you are referring to is to move the flexplate away from the back of the block so that the nuts that hold on the torque converter don't hit the oil pump gear extension on the back of the block. Not all kits require this spacer as I remember. It was about 3/16 inch thick. It is easy to see if it is a problem by slipping the flexplate on the crank and then slide the torque converter onto the flexplate. Depending on which engine you are working with makes a call to Gene the best bet. Google his company in Salem, Oregon and I'm sure you will find him. |
03-06-2015, 07:50 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
From what I've read in the instructions it's a balancing act between the torque converter nuts hitting the cam/oil pump idler cover and the starter ring gear hitting the starter bendix gear with the starter at rest. Apparently there is a need to clearance grind an area on the block to miss the torque converter bolts on pre 8BA engines. I'll knock one up out of some 3/16" stock. It states the normal way of mounting the parts is, spacer on then flexplate, and check clearance at the starter gears. It's due to this info I've reckoned that I'll probably need the spacer. 42Merc, if it's really not to much bother, I'd love to have the measured thickness. Chris, You've fitted two of these kits, what do you think of the way it works? Did you find that the C4 eat all your power and turned the car into a slug? Or did they feel like they had the same power as before, and your left leg liked you much more? Just so I know what to expect. Thanks for the info all, I won't be contacting Gene, I spoke to him before about an article in an old American Rodder magazine, from this experience I guess he didn't like "over sea folk" or maybe just me. Real shame, every other person I've spoke to in the USA has been unbelievably courteous and helpful. Except Flathead Jack, he was just unbelievable! Again many thanks, Martin. |
03-06-2015, 08:13 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Buchanan, MI
Posts: 676
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Scooder, the Flat-o #1001 spacer is .125" (1/8").
Enjoy, Don |
03-06-2015, 08:25 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
|
Re: Flat o matic.
You also need a pilot bushing for the crank.
|
03-06-2015, 08:49 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Scooder I have installed a lot of the flatomatic conversions. there's a few issues to be aware of. First do not put a spacer between the crank flange and flywheel if you need to make up any distance put washers between the torque converter and flywheel this will be much better. The converter must pull out of the transmission only enough so it is not bottomed out do not pull it out any more than 1/8 of an inch. The oil pan rail at the rear of the block usually needs to be clearanced a little to clear the thin nuts usually the oil pump drive gear cover is not in the way. The torque converter has a 5/8 diameter pilot this will fit directly into early crankshafts without any bushing. An aluminum bushing is used to adapt the converter to any crankshaft with a larger center hole. I have seen the supplied bushing to be of poor machined quality the hole is not centered in the bushing this will cause damage to the pump and flywheel. Like any aftermarket bell housing you must check it to the crank center line I find the bell housing is always off center the last one I just completed was off .035 top to bottom and off .018 side to side. With new offset dowel pins I was able to get the bell housing under.005 to the center line. The more its offset the more the torque converter pulls on the flywheel which eventfully causes the flywheel to break in the center around the crank shaft flange.
This conversion is OK out of the box BUT if you take the time to check the acuracy it will be perfect. |
03-06-2015, 11:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,630
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Ronnieroadster..... A question was asked in post #6 if the auto trans robs the power. What do you think?.... MARK
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin' My ragged ol' truck up and haulin' myself into town. Billy Joe Shaver |
03-07-2015, 04:28 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Thanks for the info again guys.
Ronnie, That's some real good stuff right there. Makes sence too, A guy I know had a flatomatic in an F100, had repeated trouble with the front pump/input shaft area in the C4, what you've said about centering the kit would have fixed this I bet. Really appreciate the posts, Martin. |
03-07-2015, 04:56 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Quote:
Mark I have not noticed any power loss with the C-4 even behind stock flatheads. Everyone I have helped with this combination really enjoy the feel and power. The flathead engine seems to really like the auto conversion with a higher rear gear like 325 its a great conversion. On my wife's Deuce coupe Hot Rod with the C-4 its really amazing how well it runs and pulls the engine is only a .060 over stock bore and 3-3/4 stroke the final ratio in my Halibrand is 280 the car fly's right along nicely. Ron |
|
03-07-2015, 05:25 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Quote:
Ron |
|
03-08-2015, 07:58 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,593
|
Re: Flat o matic.
Ron,
You've made my feeling of apprehension about fitting the C4, into a feeling of excitement, with your experience of the performance of this combination. I have to do this due to bad knees, stock flathead and clutch operated in normal rpm, is not to bad. Driving it like I stole it, the pedal pressure at north of 6G is excessive. So my truck is standard shift and overdrive, clutchless changes below governor speed, and automatic shift between second to overdrive second around town, equates to less clutch work. My little A roadster will be flathead and C4, now I'll be able to kick its arse without me suffering the pain. I'd kinda excepted the C4 was gonna suck some power, wasn't happy about it though. From your experience of this combination, I'm now a very happy bunny. All the best, Martin. Ps. I'll be sure to check the centering of the pilot, and pad hights, before installation. Last edited by scooder; 03-08-2015 at 08:00 AM. Reason: The ps bit. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|