Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2012, 12:40 PM   #21
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Since the Model A is a non-syncro tranny, gear grinding is simply a function of proper double clutching or correct timing of the pause between upshifts. Either method will depend on the viscosity and temperature of the gear oil used. I find double clutching easier to perfect than the timing between upsifts with no double clutching. Down shifting takes a lot of practice and I very seldom downshift to first while in motion over about 5 MPH.
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 06:58 PM   #22
Bruce,Upstate NY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Odessa, NY
Posts: 385
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

When the manufacturer (STP) says don't use it straight, I wouldn't. I understand its purpose is as a viscosity increaser, not a straight lubricant.
Bruce,Upstate NY is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-03-2012, 08:12 PM   #23
Louis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Marietta GA.
Posts: 647
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce,Upstate NY View Post
When the manufacturer (STP) says don't use it straight, I wouldn't. I understand its purpose is as a viscosity increaser, not a straight lubricant.
Would today's STP be better then what was used in the 30's, 40's ?
Louis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 07:19 AM   #24
JBill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 702
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

I've been using half 600 weight oil and half STP and have had no problems with shifting/grinding, though I haven't checked for the foaming that's been mentioned in this thread. That's just in the transmission, not in the differential.
JBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 01:14 PM   #25
eagle
Senior Member
 
eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Eagle Bend, MN
Posts: 2,025
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

I really like the "feel" of the Lucas hub oil. When you shift, the gears feel silky smooth, not the hash metel-on-metal feeling of the 600W. It is not really so thick, just really sticky so the gears are covered in it all the time. Take a drop between your finger and thumb, when you open your fingers it strings out, sticky like syrup or honey. I learned to drive in a 1950 Dodge 1 1/2 ton grain truck at home on the farm, so its not that I don't know how to shift & double clutch etc. But, Lucas makes it a lot easier, and doesn't fade when the tranny gets warmed up.
eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 11:55 AM   #26
bogiediver
Senior Member
 
bogiediver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 290
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
From the Lucus Hub Oil stats page...
http://www.lucasoil.com/images/media...C99DB079CD.pdf
Viscosity @ 100°C cSt = 65.0

From a forum re: STP
Viscosity @ 100°C cSt = 250
Zinc compounds: 10%
Petroleum distillates: 30%
Mineral Oil: 60%

From another Barn thread:
600w - Viscosity @ 100°C cSt = 27

Compare to the viscosity charts I attached -

In the first - the numbers in the red and blue bars are the 'weights' as typically used - the scale at the bottom is the 'true' viscosity

Second table - Marco posted in that other Barn thread...

Ah - another oil thread...

Anyone got true viscosity stats on the other products mentioned?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Oil Viscosity.jpg (36.5 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg Oil viscosity_table_2.jpg (16.6 KB, 44 views)
__________________
- bogie
'31 (Mostly) Roadster
bogiediver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 11:59 AM   #27
bogiediver
Senior Member
 
bogiediver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 290
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Better image of chart 2
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Oil viscosity_table_2.jpg (47.2 KB, 57 views)
__________________
- bogie
'31 (Mostly) Roadster
bogiediver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 01:20 PM   #28
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

The only 'gear clash' that I ever get is 2-3 when the transmitter is warm and it doesn't make much difference whether I wait or double clutch.. The other shifts are usually fine unless I screw up..
I just put in some of the Lucas hub oil.. It appears to be 'thicker' [ and certainly stickier] than the 600 weight [ not 600W] that I had in the box.. I haven't tried it yet,but, will post what happens.. I'm just posting now to let you know what I found when asking about this stuff.. I was told this stuff was also made for and will work fine in old transmitters and differentials [ heck, the bottle evens says so,, so,, after all,, it must be true. hehehe].. Time will tell, I guess..
Patrick L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 05:31 AM   #29
SAJ
Senior Member
 
SAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 514
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

I recently had cause to wonder about the same things because my gearbox used to feel like treacle on cold mornings, and gears changed very well when warmed up. But after about 5000 miles, the changes could not be made as smoothly at higher speeds, and the treacly feeling when cold was gone. I had Snyders oil and 5% Molykote M55 suspension in it. I like MoS2 lubricant because it quiets my slightly noisy worn gears and acts as a boundary lubricant under severe conditions.
Anyway, I drained the oil and did a few quick tests in my laboratory at my company with stuff I had to hand and came up with the idea that I needed a lowish viscosity at lower temperatures, and something higher than usual at working temps.
This requires viscosity index polymers and I had some Moreys oil stabiliser to hand, plus the Snyders Transmission oil, and the MoS2 suspension, so I mixed 20% Moreys, 3.8% Molykote M55 and 76.2% Snyders. I am now running on this and gear changes are back to very smooth and easy, with a treacly feeling when cold.
Then I saw this thread, so went and got some Lucas Hub Oil, 85W-140 gear oil (I could not get the lighter oil H L Chauvin mentioned here in NZ) and Lucas Heavy Duty Oil Stabiliser.
Because I am leaving for Marquette very soon, I did not have time to set up proper API tests, so I just tested in a water bath at 20 and 25 Deg C and an oven at 70 deg C – because we run both constantly in our lab for polyester resin testing.
I reckon the running temp of my gearbox on the motorway is about 50 deg C, but this is a guess and I will measure it when I get back from the USA. The higher the oil viscosity, the hotter the box will run and this will, in turn, reduce the running viscosity of the oil until a happy balance is achieved.
The results are; Snyder Trans oil =A; Snyder/Moreys/MoS2 blend as above=B; Lucas 85W-140 gear oil=C; Lucas Heavy Duty oil Stabiliser=D; 50/50 Lucas C and D=E; Lucas hub oil=F. Results are centipoises measured on a Brookfield viscometer. Multiply by the oils SG (about0.9) to get centistokes
Temp. A B C D E F
20Deg C 3920 ? 1330 1112 2280 7720

25Deg C 2800 3900 2550 ? ? ?


70Deg C 194 210 72 340 180 268

This was a very quick look, so all the results are not there, but they show how a polymeric viscosity improver like Moreys and Lucas can lower viscosity loss at higher temps.
Lucas Hub oil looks good in the table, but it is interesting Lucas themselves advised against it in another post. The Lucas 50/50 blend looks OK too, and the blend B I am using also holds viscosity well.
None of this is a recommendation, because I know nothing about what is in the components. It could be that the Snyder oil in blend B already contains a lot of VI improver and I have added too much now. This is why I put in MoS2, which acts as a boundary lubricant where lubricant failure conditions could be approached. My gearbox is a bit quieter with the Moly than without too.
Plus it says nothing about foaming and other properties, and my shear-thinned old oil certainly foamed.
The working conditions in a straight-cut box are a lot less demanding than a hypoid box, and it is reported on this forum that straight STP, and steam cylinder oil worked fine for many years, so I suspect any of the above would perform OK in a Model A
Apologies for the long post. But it may prompt more input and experiences to help us all

SAJ in NZ

Last edited by SAJ; 06-07-2012 at 05:37 AM. Reason: tabulation error
SAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 05:38 AM   #30
SAJ
Senior Member
 
SAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 514
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Sorry, the table is a mess and I have not got time to fix it.
SAJ in NZ
SAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 10:46 AM   #31
bogiediver
Senior Member
 
bogiediver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 290
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

A = Snyder Trans oil
B = Snyder 76.2%/Moreys 20%/MoS2 3.8% blend
C = Lucas 85W-140 gear oil
D = Lucas Heavy Duty oil Stabilizer
E = 50/50 Lucas C and D
F = Lucas hub oil

Temp....... A........ B........ C........ D........ E........ F........
20Deg C... 3920... ? ........ 1330... 1112... 2280... 7720

25Deg C... 2800... 3900.... 2550... ?........ ?........ ?

70Deg C... 194..... 210..... 72....... 340.... 180..... 268
__________________
- bogie
'31 (Mostly) Roadster

Last edited by bogiediver; 06-07-2012 at 10:51 AM. Reason: Added definitions
bogiediver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 11:17 AM   #32
Brobrian
Senior Member
 
Brobrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 315
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Wow!
I'm not sure what all this means. I think maybe 50/50 Lucas Hub oil and Snyders 600w is the ticket. Did I get that right?
Of course, I live in SoCal where it never freezes and summertime temps are high.
__________________
Forty horses is plenty.
Brobrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:39 PM   #33
Art Bjornestad
Senior Member
 
Art Bjornestad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Westlake Village, CA
Posts: 477
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

The working conditions inside an A box are pretty hostile as the gear face contact area is very small whereas a hypoid has a quite long contact area plus a wiping motion unlike a straight cut gear which really hits the face with quite a wallop. Hypoid use in a straight cut gear box will promote case hardening problems because of the high impact loads.
Art Bjornestad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:20 PM   #34
H. L. Chauvin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,179
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Art,

Something interesting is surfing the internet, (not only on Model A Forums), but also on other vintage car Forums, reviewing what inexperienced, novice vintage car owners have suggested to place in vintage car gear boxes with straight cut gears in gear boxes.

Reminds me of the uninformed construction worker's rubber boot gang of cement finishers, (who know absolutely nothing about ASTM Testing & Concrete Testing Laboratories), telling others that one can strengthen concrete by adding water; or even better yet, adding sugar to concrete.

Would not surprise me if one hears that a double shot of old time Croton Oil is good to add to Model A gear boxes. Can't get it anymore -- most people today never heard of it -- real potent & powerful stuff with just a few drops!
H. L. Chauvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 04:39 PM   #35
SAJ
Senior Member
 
SAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 514
Default Re: Transmission Fluid

Thanks for that nice tabulation Bogie Driver. I am obviously no good at making up tables!
Re mixing Snyder oil and Lucas hub oil, I would not attempt that, since we have no knowledge of what is actually in either one and Lucas oils recommended, elsewhere in this forum, not to use hub oil.
I stand corrected on over-simplifying the straight-cut versus hypoid oil matter. All I meant to convey is that oil selection is less tricky for spur gears than for hypoid. Hypoid boxes need certain EP additives to prevent localised tooth welding that spur gear boxes do not need. These gears can take more torque than spur gears due to multiple tooth contact, but the sliding action requires use of EP additives at levels not necessary in spur gear boxes. In these, the lubricant formula can be less complicated, so gear failure is less likely as long as a good gear oil is used. None of this means that a hypoid oil would be good in a Model A gearbox, however, for several other reasons.
But simpler spur gear gear oils still benefit from anti-corrosion, anti-oxidation and anti-foam additives (which I imagine were not in original steam cylinder oil) and these may or may not be compatible in different brands of oil. So I would not personally randomly mix these just to arrive at a certain viscosity.
I making up the Snyder/Moreys/MoS2 formula mentioned, I held the mix at 100 Deg C in an oven for several weeks and then filtered it to ensure no horrible interactions occurred (sludging, oxidation etc) before I used it.
This post is a bit complicated and the hypoid bit is fairly irrelevant to Model A's, so I wish i had not used this example now.
I should say that I am no lubricants chemist these days, and have forgotten much of what I knew many years ago when I manufactured oils and greases under the Rocol (UK) brand
Regards
SAJ in NZ
SAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.