Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2011, 08:51 AM   #1
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Can anyone measure the rear body stand on a finished 1929 Tudor and tell us what lenght they are? Center of rivet to top of the stands where the body sits above the bumper arms
Need to settle and argument as I think 4.5 inches is for another car.
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2011, 10:23 AM   #2
Randy in ca
Senior Member
 
Randy in ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,640
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

The stands for the 28-29 Tudor are about 2-1/2".
The 4-1/2" ones are for Coupes & Roadsters, which are also set to the rear of the arm quite a bit further than the sedans. Believe the later (30-31) sedans also had stands that were around 4-1/2". YOU WIN !!!

Last edited by Randy in ca; 05-19-2011 at 10:28 AM.
Randy in ca is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 05-19-2011, 10:16 PM   #3
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Talking Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy in ca View Post
The stands for the 28-29 Tudor are about 2-1/2".
The 4-1/2" ones are for Coupes & Roadsters, which are also set to the rear of the arm quite a bit further than the sedans. Believe the later (30-31) sedans also had stands that were around 4-1/2". YOU WIN !!!
Randy seems certain, but his use of the word "About" will leave some doubt. Anyone else want to back me and Randy? Sorry, no walla walla sweets up fer grabs, just more work for me changing another man's work and opinion. (Maybe some Peaches & Cream corn could be found)
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2011, 11:07 PM   #4
85930tudor
Senior Member
 
85930tudor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: richmond ky
Posts: 322
Send a message via Yahoo to 85930tudor
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

my 30 tudor is 41/2
85930tudor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 07:46 AM   #5
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Thanks for that 8593 Tudor! So we know the 1930 stand are 4.5". Is there a difference in hieght with the 28-29s?. They made a lot of Tudor Sedans, must be a few of you that have one.
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 08:38 AM   #6
wrndln
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 5,159
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Farrell,
Not that is matters much, but I just measured the body stands on my 29 phaeton and they were 2 7/8" to 2 15/16" (not 2 1/2") from center of rivet to top of stand. I always thought that 28/29 phaetons and tudors were the same, but maybe not (or it has the wrong rear bumper arms). I also measured the stands on my 28 special coupe (which you know already) and they were 4 1/2" like mentioned before. I bought a set of what was supposed to be 28/28 coupe roadster rear bumper arms for my 28 roadster and when I measured them, the stands were 4 7/8" - go figure. I am starting to wonder what is what. I believe there was a drawing on the old Fordbarn that compared the different arms (coupes/roadsters/sedans, 28/29 and 30/31), but of course that data base is not accessible.
Rusty Nelson

Last edited by wrndln; 05-20-2011 at 02:20 PM.
wrndln is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 11:30 AM   #7
85930tudor
Senior Member
 
85930tudor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: richmond ky
Posts: 322
Send a message via Yahoo to 85930tudor
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

According Bratton`s the 28 29 tudor and fordor are 3" inches tall found that in the 2011 cat. Page 105 ...Dave
85930tudor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 01:53 PM   #8
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Hmmmm...............
Snyders list only three lenghts:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg body stands.gif.jpg (113.4 KB, 31 views)
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 01:58 PM   #9
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

And three Bumper brackets:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg body stands.gif2.jpg (122.9 KB, 17 views)
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 02:05 PM   #10
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

From Brattons:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg body stands.gif3.jpg (46.1 KB, 29 views)
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 02:11 PM   #11
JoeWay
Senior Member
 
JoeWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Quincy CA
Posts: 752
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farrell In Vancouver View Post
...Center of rivet to top of the stands where the body sits above the bumper arms...
Snyder's and Bratton's would seem to be measuring the overall height.
The original brackets on my May '29 Tudor measure about 3-1/8" overall and about 2-5/8" to the rivet centerline.

Joe
__________________
1929 Tudor
since 1962
Feather River A's
JoeWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 02:18 PM   #12
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

I find myself wondering why the 28-29 brackets were an inch shorter than the 30-31 Tudor sedans. Must have been a change in the bumper bracket geometry and not the bodies? Now where did Rusty's brackets come from @ 2 7/8ths"?
Going home tonight and dig for some 3" risers and some fat rivets to try a re/re on this Tudor.
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 02:19 PM   #13
Farrell In Vancouver
Senior Member
 
Farrell In Vancouver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pitt Meadows BC
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands

Thanks Joe, you beat me typing
Farrell In Vancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 04:03 PM   #14
Marco Tahtaras
Senior Member
 
Marco Tahtaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,099
Default Re: Confused or misled: 1928-29 Rear Body Stands



There is no magic here. Look at the level of the rear bumper arm as viewed from the side of the car. It goes UP and over the rear cross member, where it then slopes gradually downward until it reaches the desired level for the bumper height and then continues straight (relatively level) rearward.

Different bodies have different lengths. Don't focus on the upper body, focus on the floor area. The big Fordors are obviously long bodies at the top, but Coupe and Roadster bodies are the longest at the bottom and have the longest floor area.

The top of the rear bumper arm support bracket is always level (approximately) with the top of the frame when installed. The overall height of the bracket depends where it's located on the incline of the bumper arm. The further forward or up the incline, the shorter the bracket must be.

The Coupe and and Roadster bodies as mentioned are the longest. The bracket is therefore at the rearmost position which is actually before the incline going forward. My Roadster shows the bracket to be 4-3/4" tall from the rivet center and 5-1/4" overall. My '30 Fordor has it in the third position forward putting it up the incline a bit. It measures 4" tall from the rivet center and 4-1/2" overall.

Now, I've known my Ford drawing above was incomplete so we've learned two things going through this exercise today. First it is clear that the 55-A ('28-29 Tudor) had the brackets located at the forward most position. The thing that surprises me or at least was unexpected is that the floor of the '30-31 Tudor is more than 2" longer than the '28-29. That explains why the latter uses the taller bracket.


As a final note, if you have a bumper arm with a bracket that is the incorrect height for your model that means it's also in the incorrect location for your model. If you DO change the height of the bracket without relocating it then you will have a bumper arm that is not correct for ANY model!
__________________
http://www.abarnyard.com/
Marco Tahtaras is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.