|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-09-2015, 04:23 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 1,470
|
An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Driving to work this morning, my AV8 with 52 Merc motor , with early heads, and no t- stats, was running poorly, I almost turned around and took it home, but it smoothed out some and ran ok. But the whole trip, about 15 miles, the top temp was 130 degrees.
The outside air temp this morning was about 45 degrees. I guess I'll be putting some in before fall gets here! |
07-09-2015, 06:11 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Personally i would never go without them.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-09-2015, 06:25 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
if your engine isn't running near 180 degrees your engine is not completely burning the fuel charge, carboning up your rings, valve faces and stems, along with the carbon building on the top of the pistons, but the worst thing is the sludge forming in the pan and engine because the oil doesn't get hot enough to burn off the contaminates
|
07-09-2015, 06:52 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,687
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
They are in there for a reason..
__________________
"Came too close to dying to stop living now!" |
07-09-2015, 07:01 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Gloucester VA
Posts: 1,042
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
What he said X 10000 Lonnie |
|
07-09-2015, 08:06 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: central nj
Posts: 717
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
07-09-2015, 10:47 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pittsford NY. USA
Posts: 1,096
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
|
07-10-2015, 10:03 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 1,110
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
So what is the best thermostat for a 59AB stock engine? Thanks
|
07-10-2015, 10:09 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
I think they should run even hotter, I recommend 180 deg stats and the engine should run between 180 to200 for best power and economy. Especiall those with the forged pistons, this will tighten them up a bit.
|
07-10-2015, 11:57 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
"So what is the best thermostat for a 59AB stock engine? Thanks"
I like and use the NAPA THM111 thermostat. It's a high flow 170 degree used in a Subaru |
07-10-2015, 02:35 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pa.
Posts: 2,163
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Hi Ralph, as indicated there are lots of arguments about t-stats in a flatty. Everyone should know that overheating in Ford V8 flattys since the beginning. Having said that I have gone with and without. It does seem as though even in the hot weather my 8BA runs better / doesn't overheat runs better with the t-stats in. I deduce from many threads on the subject that is because in the hotter weather if you don't have stats the water runs through the engine too fast not giving in engine time to absorb the heat and expel it at the radiator. So much for why the stats work better in summer. I run 160's and in summer the engine runs at 180 to 200 ( as Ole Ron says that's optimum for performance. In the winter and fall with temps more like yours 45 to 50F it ran at 160 with and less than that without. If your cruises are typically at or below 50f for a significant length of time reunning at 130f as you indicate then as has been said your not getting the most out of your engine and are probable building carbon and fouling your plugs. Go with 180 stats and check your plugs. As you probably know you can use MMM oil treatment poured slowly through the carb ( trickle it ) at a fast idle and clean out the carbon already built up. Lots of smoke when you do and that's normal. Some think this is an old wives tail but I have done on many older engines and when I finally got around to pulling the heads for what ever the tops of the pistons and cylinder heads were amazingly clean for older engines with 100K plus miles. Sea foam auto additive will do the same. Instructions on use for same http://www.nicoclub.com/archives/how...right-way.html
Here's more info on it http://www.amazon.com/Sea-Foam-SF-16...ywords=seafoam Good luck!!
__________________
Nomad |
07-10-2015, 03:06 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
No question but that one is the best.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
|
07-10-2015, 03:47 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida and Penna.
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Napa THM-111 is not a high flow thermostat. Measure the opening in the top, it restricts the flow. G.M.
__________________
www.fordcollector.com |
07-10-2015, 03:59 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
there is a little misunderstanding about thermostats, they really don't make your engine run hotter, if your engine runs at 180 or 190 with 160 degree thermostats it will run 180 or 190 with 180 degree thermostats, all the thermostat does is stop water circulation until the water temp reaches 180, then it opens and lets the water get thru the radiator to be cooled, if you have a quality high flow thermostat the engine wont over heat, it will just get to the thermostats designed temp before letting the water flow and keep the engine temp at the best operating temp
|
07-10-2015, 04:22 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Gloucester VA
Posts: 1,042
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
|
07-11-2015, 06:40 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida and Penna.
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Lonnie anyone can write posts, books and articles in magazines about thermostats or other fixes. How about washers with 5/8" holes in the upper water outlet, drill holes in the impellers or remove every other impeller and a lot more "old wives tales. The people that wrote them no doubt think or believes these cures worked. It has been proven in the last 15 years that more coolant flowing through the engine provides better cooling. Any thermostat may work under some conditions like living in Northern parts of the country, not driving the car for long distances on 85 plus days and not driving in heavy traffic. The washer in the hose fix was the largest "fix" that went on for years. The hoses have a 1 3/4" ID that allows a full flow of coolant to circulate though both sides of the engine, any large reduction of flow cause the engine temperatures to rise. There is also the problem of the radiator tubes being a restriction. The coolant must be forced through the tubes or it will back up in the top tank and run out the over flow on early cars without a pressure cap. This causes the coolant to become low and the engine runs hotter. Most modern thermostats have about a 7/8 ID opening restricting the flow, the only stats I know of that have larger openings that are less restrictive are the ones that Robertshaw made is the 330 series, 330-160 and 330-180. Myself, friends and Bob Shewman has well over a 1,000 old Fords in hot weather using these with engines running in the 180 range in 90 plus temperatures. True results are produced in the deep South where it is 85 or higher most of the year. G.M.
__________________
www.fordcollector.com |
07-11-2015, 09:05 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Jeez.......Ralph only mentions the nature and importance of running T-stats to heat-up an engine in a colder environment........he clearly said it was 45 degrees F. ambient and that the engine only reached 130 F. operating temp, yet we're given the full-on, "only Skip's way is the right way" version of keeping a flathead cool.......AGAIN! That repetitive and rhetorical "ad" is starting to get very old. DD
|
07-11-2015, 10:39 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 1,470
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Yes, I have the opposite problem of most flathead owners, how to make it run hotter.
In running the early heads, do I have to have the type that slips down into the head? Weren't the original ones made like a tube, instead of the more modern flat style? |
07-11-2015, 11:49 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,835
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
__________________
"Never complain,never explain"... Henry Ford II |
|
07-11-2015, 03:01 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida and Penna.
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
but if it helps just one person that's what this site is all about. G.M.
__________________
www.fordcollector.com |
|
07-11-2015, 03:12 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
A wax stat usually fails when open. A bellows (alcohol)type is usually shut after it fails. The use of modern(70s, 80s, 90s.) wax type thermostats (as far as I know) was a fairly common practice. The problem was the flange (o.d.) is too big, and they have to be ground / cut down to fit in the top hose. This is a bit of a challenge to do and my understanding is that many of the stats in modern Japanese built cars are physically the same stats with a smaller o.d.
Someone previously in this thread mentioned an 84 Nissan 300zx stat. Since then more Japanese cars use these smaller stats. I would suggest searching for one of these in the right heat range and using that. I hope that helps. Last edited by Bluebell; 07-11-2015 at 03:27 PM. |
07-11-2015, 03:13 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gerrardstown, WV
Posts: 2,265
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Amen, GM
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-11-2015, 03:49 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
G.M. you are obviously a very knowledgeable and experienced guy, and you have strong views about the need for high flow stats in flathead v8s.
It seems to me that nearly every other engine out there runs ONE thermostat, Not TWO high flow ones. It doesn't seem to matter if its a 429 cu. in. or a small truck pulling 6 ton. they manage on ONE standard flow thermostat. There are millions of them around the world including quite a few in hot parts of the planet. Maybe it's more than just high flow thermostats that is the flaw in Henry's design? |
07-11-2015, 04:03 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,086
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
John |
|
07-11-2015, 07:12 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: At my kitchen table in Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 2,903
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
I have the the same problem, I put cardboard in front of the radiator in the winter or when it is cold hear, I cover 2/3 of it that way it will warm up to 180. with out it the motor will only heat up to about 110
__________________
If it would have been a snake it would have bit ya! i can't spell my way out of a paper bag! |
07-11-2015, 07:19 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,303
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
|
|
07-11-2015, 07:37 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
I don't always agree with GM, but he is a very smart guy, and the ford flat head has to have two thermostats because it has two water return hoses to the radiator, so why don't you figure out a way to use only one thermostat?, it does no good to control the water going back to the radiator on half the engine. modern cars use one thermostat because they only have one radiator hose to return the water to the radiator, fords flat head had heating problem because the hot exhaust gases were exited thru the block instead of the head like modern cars
Last edited by WestCoast; 07-11-2015 at 09:57 PM. |
07-11-2015, 09:45 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
For anyone interested, here are two controlled tests I performed regarding thermostats:
This one compares the NAPA thermostat referred to with no thermostats: http://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=113979 This one compares what I think is the highest flow thermostat for the 59A engine (the same NAPA stat referred to) with another thermostat that claims to be high flow and has been heavily promoted as such: http://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=143576 One more thing for Ralph Moore or anyone else trying thermostats in their 59A for the first time, the current replacement thermostats tend to get pushed up into the hose by the water pressure below, turn sideways, and quit working. One way to secure them is with a short piece of a single strand of a stranded wire thus:
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness Last edited by Old Henry; 07-11-2015 at 10:01 PM. |
07-11-2015, 09:59 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Just in case anyone wants to get the Stant stat for their engine here is some information about that. It is a Stant 14157 available on line many places including Amazon here: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000C822YC or at NAPA part number THM 111, or at O'Reilly that sells the same stat as a Murray 4157, O'Reilly part number 2962.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
07-11-2015, 10:17 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 1,470
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Henry, that's what I needed. looks like a way to make a modern T stat work. I was concerned about the things turning in the hoses and being useless.
|
07-12-2015, 03:20 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
West coast, You have missed my point. The point was that each thermostat is only dealing with 120 Cu.in. 4 cylinder!
Why do they need a "high flow" thermostat in each side, when so many bigger capacity, higher horsepower output engines only need one std flow stat in total? Maybe it comes back to clean radiators, clean engine water jackets, with the core sand removed from them. Basically if an engine is taken back to its full specifications, I don't believe it needs "high flow" thermostats. Here is a quote from an Impco service bulletin: "The build up of rust scale or alkali deposits in the water jacket can severely affect the dissipation of heat. For example, the heat transferability of a 1" piece of cast iron with a 1/16" layer of mineral deposit, is equal to the heat transferability of a 4 1/4" piece of clean cast iron. Consequently even slight contamination can inhibit or prevent the transfer of heat from the combustion chamber to the coolant" Have a look at Old Henry's photo and you can see the example. Ask your self, "was the introduction of "high flow" thermostats the answer here? I DO agree that if short cuts are the option of choice and "good practice" is not fully dealt with, then, high flow water pumps and high flow thermostats may help. All just my opinion. Cheers. |
07-12-2015, 07:19 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida and Penna.
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
More coolant in the system, more coolant flowing through it and more air moving through the radiator fins equal optimum cooling. Any improvement in anyone of these helps. G.M.
__________________
www.fordcollector.com |
|
07-12-2015, 10:14 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Bluebell, I guess I did miss your point, but this is a v/8 forum and he was discussing his v/8 motor, thus my remark about two thermostats
|
07-12-2015, 12:51 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: san antonio, texas
Posts: 461
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
preferably, he should have said "G. M.s way is the only way".....
|
07-13-2015, 04:02 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 290
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
You have to ask yourself why does EVERY internal combustion engine manufacturer in the world put a thermostat in? Anyone who thinks an engine runs better without one is kidding themselves. |
|
07-13-2015, 04:19 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 726
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Hi Dave, I totally agree with your last point, however I'd like to point out the subtle but important point that it is not steam pressure, but expanded water that forces the pressure cap to lift.
The whole point of the pressure cap is to raise the boiling point of the water, to allow the engine to operate at a higher temperature. A 1 pound increase in pressure raises the boiling point of the water in the system by 4 degrees F. (at sea level) So for example; at sea level pure water boils at 212 degrees F. Add a 4 lb cap and the boiling point goes up to 226 degrees F. A 12 lb cap raises the B.P. to 260 degrees F. An internal combustion engine is more efficient at higher temp, but the last thing you want is to have it boil. That's when the damage is done. (Not sure that any flathead Fords ran anything higher than a 4 pound system) |
07-13-2015, 07:36 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida and Penna.
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
As the water gets hot it increases the pressure in the system. We are not interested in increasing the boiling point, it has nothing to do with these engines. They should NEVER run over 210 so increasing the boiling point has no purpose. Again at 210 there is less than 3 lb pressure in an old Ford with a pressure cap or 3 lb valve. The pressure cap or valve has 2 functions, keep the water from backing up in the top tank which forces the water through the radiator tubes and as a SAFETY VALVE to release the pressure if it gets above 3 or 4 lbs from temperatures above 210 or from a compression leak. It's very simple don't try to make it complicated. G.M.
__________________
www.fordcollector.com |
07-13-2015, 08:30 AM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 285
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
|
|
07-13-2015, 08:44 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: CT.
Posts: 596
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Always use them!
__________________
A man should do what he thinks best! "The Duke" |
07-13-2015, 08:44 AM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: north central Oklahoma
Posts: 38
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Just curious, I do not currently have a running v-8 flathead , but has anyone ever tried a comparison test with two different style thermostats, one in each head, take temp. readings with infa red heat gun, before and after thermostats, out of radiator, various points on heads? Swap sides with thermostats and compare. Swapping sides would cancel other variables, internal heat transfer, water pump differences, ambient temps, air flow, etc. Might give interesting results.
|
07-13-2015, 08:56 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 783
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Pardon my ignorance but what is a "wax" thermostat? I have never heard the term or, if I have, have long forgotten. (CRS Syndrome)
|
07-13-2015, 09:38 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Odessa, FL
Posts: 7,611
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
The question of thermostats is akin to questions about what oil to use or what spark plugs to use, etc. I think that trial and error, in each case, is the answer for the individual vehicle. For example, I run Autolite 216 spark plugs, (after having problems with champion H-10's). I use 20-50 weight oil, and I don't use any thermostats. I live in Tampa, Florida where it is usually hot & humid and all my Flatheads run at between 170 to 190 degrees, depending on the time of year and the driving conditions i.e., highway or stop and go traffic (to clarify, at some of the forever stop lights, the temp will go up to 200+ degrees however, once traffic is moving, it doesn't take long before the temp is back to normal driving range). I do have 'Skips' water pumps on all my Flatheads and his coils on several, along with distributors rebuilt by Skip and 'Bubba'. The bottom line is; you need to test different scenarios in your vehicles, under the kind of driving conditions that you would expect to encounter 90% of the time, before you come up with the best combination for your Flatheads.
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-13-2015, 09:43 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Wow Vic........WELL SAID! DD
|
07-13-2015, 12:12 PM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: west grove Pa.
Posts: 238
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
|
|
07-13-2015, 12:37 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Pete
I'd say you have everything just right: A clean block and a clean good radiator. As you mention, there really should not be a big temperature spread if everything is right. I think many of us, myself included, have failed in one way or another to be real sure that the block itself is as clean as it could be. |
07-13-2015, 12:53 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Odessa, FL
Posts: 7,611
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
__________________
Imagination is more important than knowledge. |
|
07-13-2015, 01:22 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
I've posted this before, it is a record of a conversation with a Stant thermostat engineer about the operating characteristics of thermostats.
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
07-13-2015, 04:09 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 1,470
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Good read, so I guess it all boils down to( pun intended) each indvidual engine and how/ where it is used and a dozen other variables.
|
07-13-2015, 04:41 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
prpmmp, the thermostat does not control cooling, all it does is stop the water from circulating to the radiator till the water in the engine reaches the designed thermo temp, at that temp the water is allowed to flow to the radiator, most engines will run hotter when idling because of reduced water and air flow thru the rad, excessive heat build up can be caused by a bad rad, water pump, and a fan that does not pull enough air thru the rad, when at speed more air is being forced thru the rad, hench the engine runs cooler, if your car runs at lets say 200 degrees, the thermostat has nothing to do with that, it opens at 180 degrees and lets water flow, the cooling is left to the water pump, radiator, fan and a moving car, basically a thermostat is an idiot, it only knows how to do one thing, open at the temp it was designed for
|
07-13-2015, 04:44 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
joe imbler, the wax thermostat is referring to the medium used to make the thermo work, a wax thermo stat is one using wax to expand at temp and open the thermostat
|
07-13-2015, 05:09 PM | #51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: west grove Pa.
Posts: 238
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
|
|
07-13-2015, 05:20 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Just my take .Ford offered several types of Radiators some with a extra row of tubes for hot climates . Henry didn't like the spaghetti look of the hot manafolding above the engine on the v8s he had in the lab while developing his flathead such as the Cadillac .Since he was in a cold climate Henry decided the exhaust exiting through the block would give him a fast warm up plus a better looking engine , In my experiments having thermostats in a warm climate is not as critical on a flat head because of the fast warm up ,adding one can have a negative affect depending on other factors that's already been pointed out .To run a thermostat you should have Ideally the large Radiator offered by Ford for a hot climate ,To improve a marginal cooling system a shroud can be added and hi flow pumps that will also help ,a blocked Radiator will cause a low pressure zone in the block a hi flow pump will over come this to some degree .Also the sealing off of the top tank with a low pressure cap forces water through ,this is a different scenario to running high pressure so the water doesn't boil out .To run a single thermostat you would need a much higher flow pump like modern cars have .I think this is were the problem is a high flow pump will possibly over come the restricted thermostat and give you the results your looking for, but its what works for you .Ted
Quote Just curious, I do not currently have a running v-8 flathead , but has anyone ever tried a comparison test with two different style thermostats, one in each head, take temp. readings with infa red heat gun, before and after thermostats, out of radiator, various points on heads? Swap sides with thermostats and compare. Swapping sides would cancel other variables, internal heat transfer, water pump differences, ambient temps, air flow, etc. Might give interesting results. Quote Ahh...no, with a pressure cap the temperature can go higher before it reaches it's boiling point, once water reaches it's boiling point the STEAM pressure overrides the cap.... or the radiator fails. You have to ask yourself why does EVERY internal combustion engine manufacturer in the world put a thermostat in? Anyone who thinks an engine runs better without one is kidding themselves. vvv Last edited by FlatheadTed; 07-13-2015 at 06:17 PM. |
07-13-2015, 06:40 PM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
This one compares the NAPA thermostat referred to with no thermostats: http://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=113979 This one compares what I think is the highest flow thermostat for the 59A engine (the same NAPA stat referred to) with another thermostat that claims to be high flow and has been heavily promoted as such: http://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=143576
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
|
07-13-2015, 07:38 PM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Eagan mn
Posts: 132
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
ok a stupid question on a 1941 59ab how and where do you install thermostats?? will they stay in the hose buy themselves??
|
07-13-2015, 07:51 PM | #55 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
See post #28 for one method. And NO, they will not stay in the hose by themselves.
Edit: corrected per Henry Last edited by JSeery; 07-13-2015 at 09:42 PM. |
07-13-2015, 08:17 PM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Quote:
Actually, it's post # 28. Use a single strand of stranded wire. Only one hose clamp necessary placed at the top of the neck to be sure and grab the wires. Cheap, easy, effective, and doesn't change the stock appearance of the engine.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
|
07-13-2015, 08:17 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: west grove Pa.
Posts: 238
|
Re: An argument FOR thermostats. ..
Hey!! This is what I did.I have weiand aluminum heads that have a 2 inch outlet.I had to grind out a little of the inside for the thermostat to set inside,then I had to file the top flat where the stat sits.My tubes that go to the radiator are 1 3/4 so I got a hose reducer from NAPA for the 2 inch to 1 3/4. I then put a little silicone on the top of the outlet,put the stat on slide the 2 inch hose on then put a little silicone on the top of the stat and slide the reducer over the stat and inside the 2 inch hose. Then when you put the tube inside the reducer you put a hose clamp on the bottom of the 2 inch around the outlet and another around at the tube, that holds the stat tight against the outlet and no coolent can get past until the stat opens. Hope you can understand my gibberish!! see avator Pete
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|