|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-28-2016, 03:57 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
|
Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
So, I took my car on a nice drive last Saturday. Before heading out I went to the gas station a mile from my house and filled the fuel tank. After that, I took my trip, which involved a good mixture of driving, it was mostly country two-lane travel but there was also a fair bit of stop-and-go and some highway motoring.
When I got back to my neighborhood I'd driven 92.2 miles (according to the odometer, which I think is conservative according to GPS). I went back to the gas station and filled the tank again, which required 4.317 gallons of 87 octane. According to my math, which isn't very good, I averaged better than 21 miles per gallon. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? I mean, I'm not complaining, but something doesn't seem right. It shouldn't be that high, should it? And I'm not afraid to rev it up or cruise at 65 miles an hour. My car's engine is basically stock aside from dual exhaust, an 80-thou overbore and 12-volt electrics. It's got a 3.78 rear-end and NO overdrive. |
03-28-2016, 04:32 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McMinnville, TN
Posts: 2,327
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
My 35 with a 3.54 rear gets around 22 highway. It makes me laugh everytime, as my 1996 F-150 gets 8
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-28-2016, 04:42 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 468
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
The fuel mileage from "back in the day" according to the service bulletins says 20 to 22 MPG is correct. What this tells me is your car and engine is set up correctly as to timing, carb, tire pressure etc. Also it probably does not run hot.
Congratulations, a lot of these cars are reported at 12 to 13 mpg. However they usually have typical problems of over rich mixture, late timing and other things that are wrong. If the 4.317 gallons is correct to fill the tank back to exactly where it was when you started, you are good to go! Just an opinion |
03-28-2016, 04:50 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 798
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Rascally flathead, dual carbs, Mitchell overdrive; I get 22 too.
Everyone hates me.
__________________
RIP Tyler... My Son, Helper & Best Friend. Feb '78 to Father's Day '10. www.97-express.com ~ [email protected] |
03-28-2016, 06:10 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Above the gnat line in Georgia
Posts: 7,009
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
And you're BITCHING???
__________________
Life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer to the end, the faster it goes. It is better to be seen, than viewed. "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm". |
03-28-2016, 06:23 PM | #6 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
03-28-2016, 07:04 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Quote:
I was talking to an EFV8 club member a couple years ago at Hershey. He has a 1950 or '51 sedan with the V8 and overdrive. He said he averaged like 29.5 miles per gallon on a drive of around 500 miles getting there. I was floored when he told me that but now I believe him. |
|
03-28-2016, 07:34 PM | #8 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Here's part of an old post with some of the Ford standards for level road/steady speed driving:
On another project, I located some economy standards in the Ford "Performance Services" section of the manual, along with accel and speed standards. Note that numbers are not real world, they are for short tests at steady speed/level road measured with the normal Zenith 1/10 gallon mileage tester. They only have specs with commonest axle ratios, but the different cars give a good spread of those. 1935-6 85HP, 4.11 37.1 @ 20, 22.8@ 40, 18.7 @60 1937-40 85HP, 3.78, shows 31.7, 26.2, 20.9...reasonable comparison for the above. No 85's were commonly sold with 3.54, but there are 239 numbers for the 1940 Merc with 3.54: 29.3 @20, 26.3 @40, 21.9 @ 60, numbers run 1--3MPG better than '39 Merc with 3.78. These, as noted, are pure steady state tests done just to see if a customer complaint was a car or a driver problem, but they give some indicators. You can see the reason for the national 40MPH top speed during WWII! With a heavyish car and 221, you might well like 4.11 or 3.78 with the overdrive. I too suspect gearing would be toodamnhigh with 3.54 and OD. Tests listed in the bulletin do seem to confirm that bigger engine with higher gear is better on fuel than smaller with the requisite lower gearing. Note that these were Ford's standards and expectations based on a simple test (Zenith tester) using dealer equipment; this means if someone complained about mileage the dealer was to perform the specified test...if car did not meet mileage standard, it need work. If it met spec...the complaining owner needed driving lessons. |
03-28-2016, 07:37 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: N.W. Iowa
Posts: 306
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Take that 29 mpg with a grain of salt! I've had 6 of this 49 -53's and they don't get that good...
|
03-28-2016, 07:53 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North of sandy ago, CA.
Posts: 2,064
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
In the late 50's I would fill up the oil, then check the gas.
Never checked gas miles per gallon. Bruce
__________________
Works good Lasts long time |
03-28-2016, 07:57 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
|
03-28-2016, 07:59 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fort dodge, Iowa
Posts: 822
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
|
03-29-2016, 01:18 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
My car will exceed 22 MPG. This is a flathead of 290 cubes, Potvin 425, dual 4 bbl carbs and a bunch of other mods.
I run a 4.11:1 axle and an overdrive. Flatheads are cool |
03-29-2016, 04:16 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CLAYTON DE
Posts: 1,283
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Quote:
'Our stories aren't always true, but we sure do remember them well!'
__________________
Enjoy yer day. Tom Hate can't fix what it started. |
|
03-29-2016, 05:39 AM | #15 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia
Posts: 2,204
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
My Flathead powered cars will NOT exceed 22 MPG with me driving them.
|
03-29-2016, 05:56 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,067
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
It seems I'm not capable of achieving 22 MPG in anything that I drive . . . even a late model four cylinder Subaru. Of course, it was making 310 HP on the turbo!
|
03-29-2016, 09:55 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Sask. Canada
Posts: 2,424
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
I've never driven the 52Merc more than a few miles at a time so can't comment just how thirsty it is for gas. Fuel economy was a selling point for Mercury back when they were new. Usually with the standard and overdrive transmission.
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/user/roosty6/videos |
03-29-2016, 04:58 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Palmetto, Georgia
Posts: 127
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
Back in the day, our local Standard Oil Dealer sponsored a Saturday "economy run" and it was well attended by the locals. First prize was a trophy plus free oil changes and eire rotation by the station. I don't remember the numbers (I only remember in was in the 30's ) but a 1953 Ford with overdrive was the winner for many years. Nobody else even came close........ -RG
|
03-29-2016, 05:11 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 8,137
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
If you're addicted to and can afford this hobby, it would seem that 'fuel economy' is not a priority....
__________________
The only thing nice about being imperfect is the joy it brings to others.... "Silver rings, your butt! Them's washers!" "We shot our way out of that town for a dollar's worth of steel holes!" - from 'The Wild Bunch' - 1969 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NReUd2_0u0 |
03-29-2016, 05:25 PM | #20 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: Fuel Economy is Too Good ...
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|