Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2020, 10:16 AM   #1
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

PREFACE: Forgive me, for I have sinned! Twenty-four hours ago, I posted this thread under a dumb, ill-thought-out title. In one day's time, and given the large amount of difficult-to-find information contained herein, only 110 folks have even taken a peek (with ONE reply), whereas the "Engine Paint" thread has garnered three times the viewing. So, I have learned a HUGE lesson. Continuing-on...NEW title, but... "Second verse, same as the first". After this, I will bore y'all NO MORE!
__________________________________________________ ______


1939-1948 FORD/MERC Wheelbases, Torque TUBES, Front WISHBONES
_______________________________________________


FORD Wheelbase Dimensions:


1939-1940...…..112"


1941-1948...…..114"
________________


MERCURY Wheelbase Dimensions:


1939-1940...…..116"


1941-1948...…..118"



______________________________________________


Karl Wescott has been so kind as to send his otherwise-unobtainable dimensional prints depicting the first iteration of the shorter Mercurys (1939-1940) along with their comparable year Fords, as well as the subsequent longer wheelbase Mercurys (1941-1948) and their comparable year Fords. The differences are MANY between the Fords and Mercs.
______________________________________________



1939-1940 Ford & Mercury







1939-1940 MERCURY

______________________________________________
______________________________________________
1941-1948 Ford & Mercury








__________________________________________________ ______________

Some FORD vs MERCURY Facts:


1939 and 1940 Mercurys had their own unique BODIES.


1941-1948 Mercurys began sharing common BODIES with Ford cars.


Mercury Wheelbase dimensions ALWAYS exceeded Ford Wheelbase dimensions in any given model year by 4" during the 1939-1948 era.


Fords and Mercurys utilized FOUR different wheelbase dimensions throughout the 1939-1948 I-Beam and Torque Tube era....note above!


5"-Wide wheels were available for MERCURY at least in 1941.


The "ODDBALL" one-piece Mercury driveshaft/pinion lasted ONLY 1939 and 1940.


Ford and Mercury REAR axle assembly WIDTHS are the same for like model years, as suggested by axle shaft part number comparisons, Ford/Merc.




1939-1942 Ford & Mercury SERIAL Numbers were issued independently of one another, actually based on full-size V8 engine cubic inch ratings. One should remember that transmission/engine assemblies were initially stamped with a serial number when produced, then distributed to vehicle assembly facilities. Upon the assembly's installation into a new vehicle, the serial number stamped on the transmission was hand-stamped into the vehicle frame rail. Thus, a NEW Ford or Mercury was born.


1946-1948 Ford & Mercury engines became identical cubic inch-wise and in horsepower rating. Since the 1942 Mercury engine was of a larger 239 cu. in. displacement (Ford was 221 cu. in.), Mercury's numbering system began with a "99A-" prefix (Ford prefix was still "18-"). After the War in 1946, 239 cubic inches (a Mercury holdover) was standard in Fords and Mercurys. ALL engines then received the "99A-" serial number prefix. Thusly, during 1946-1948 production years, ALL Fords and Mercurys SHARE a COMMON prefix in their automobile serial numbers. You cannot distinguish between Ford or Mercury by serial number during 1946-1948 production.
__________________________________________________ _______


I-BEAM Axles:


1939-1941 Fords & Mercurys shared "78-3010-A" I-beam axles.


1942-1948 Fords & Mercurys shared "21A-3010" I-beam axles.
__________________________________________________


Front WISHBONES:


Four different Wishbones were used on Fords & Mercs, 1939-1948


1939-1940 Ford......"78A-3405"


1941 Ford...………..…"11A-3405"


1942-1948 Ford......"21A-3405"
_________________________


1939-1940 Merc...…"99A-3405"


1941 Mercury...…...."11A-3405"


1942-1948 Merc...…"21A-3405"


NOTE: 1942-1948 Ford & Merc used SAME "21A-" Wishbone, but Mercury's 4"-longer wheelbase necessitated the use of a 4" wishbone ball adapter/extender which bolted into Merc frame....picture below!






I discovered one more interesting measurement comparison between a 1939 FORD and a 1939 MERC Wishbone. Note that '39 & '40 MERC use Wishbone "99A-3405". '39 and '40 FORD use Wishbone "78A-3405". rockflameasured between the center of his '39 MERC wishbone ball, straight forward to the center of his I-beam axle.....40-3/4". Kube measured between the center of a '39 FORD wishbone ball, straight forward to the center of his I-beam axle.....40-3/8". For some reason, MERC in 1939 decided they needed a "99A-" wishbone that placed the axle 3/8" farther forward than a "78A-" FORD wishbone would have.
_________________________________________________


Torque TUBES:


1939-1940 FORD T-Tube.....70"


1941-1948 FORD T-Tube.....72"


1939-1940 MERC T-Tube.....73-3/4" (approx.)


1941-1948 MERC T-Tube.....72" (Update)


'39-'40 Mercury MERC T-Tube NOTE: rockfla had a difficult time measuring the exact length of his '39 Merc T-Tube as the forward end of the T-Tube is very confined above the crossmember, plus the T-Tube bell is obscured by the clamshell assembly. Nevertheless, '39-'40 Merc T-Tube is ALMOST 4" longer than Ford counterpart.


The '39-'40 Merc T-Tubes ARE in fact, constructed with what appears to be a 14-15 inch sleeve in the center.....possibly a two-piece, fabricated tube. Reason unknown!
_____________________________________


Many other differences between Fords & Mercs left to verify. This compilation constitutes a concerted beginning.


1941-1948 MERCURY T-Tube dimensions are still unknown to this document.


MANY Thanks to: "rockfla", "JSeery", "rotorwrench", "Kube", "deuce_roadster", "Mac VanPelt Informational Website", "35ragtop", Karl Westcott, and probably others I'm sure, in preparation of this compilation!


Dick D (DD)

……………………..
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE

Last edited by V8COOPMAN; 06-11-2020 at 02:06 AM.
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 12:12 PM   #2
rockfla
Senior Member
 
rockfla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,928
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

I for one have copied and pasted it for my Ford & Mercury stuff archives!!!! Thanks for all the 411 Coopman!!!
rockfla is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-08-2020, 12:42 PM   #3
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,879
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Well done V-8. I think it's golden.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 03:52 PM   #4
5851a
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 1,661
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

I do find the differences interesting. Is the frame stretched out in front of firewall and engine pushed 4 inches forward along with the longer hood and fenders or is it in the main body? Longer body on 39 and 40 and then longer front on 41 to 48? Just curious.
5851a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 04:39 PM   #5
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5851a View Post
I do find the differences interesting. Is the frame stretched out in front of firewall and engine pushed 4 inches forward along with the longer hood and fenders or is it in the main body? Longer body on 39 and 40 and then longer front on 41 to 48? Just curious.

I honestly don't believe it's as simple as you state above, especially to form a definitive answer, but yeah....SOMETHING like that! I'm still scratchin' my butt trying to wrap my understanding around ALL of this in it's entirety. Look carefully at the FRONT motor mount extensions (as well as other details) on that chassis picture. That is a '41-'48 frame. DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 07:53 PM   #6
KGS
Senior Member
 
KGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Schooley's Mountain
Posts: 530
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8COOPMAN View Post
PREFACE: Forgive me, for I have sinned! Twenty-four hours ago, I posted this thread under a dumb, ill-thought-out title. In one day's time, and given the large amount of difficult-to-find information contained herein, only 110 folks have even taken a peek (with ONE reply), whereas the "Engine Paint" thread has garnered three times the viewing. So, I have learned a HUGE lesson. Continuing-on...NEW title, but... "Second verse, same as the first". After this, I will bore y'all NO MORE!
Hey Brudda, Don't give up on us now. I for one always appreciate the knowledge that you have and your willingness to share it. I know that you have a limitless amount of info and photos and I always wonder where you keep it all... And i know it ain't where you been scratchin'...
Ken
KGS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2020, 08:04 PM   #7
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Should be a Ford frame drawing somewhere, you would think some Merc guys would have looked into this.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 03:34 AM   #8
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KGS View Post
Hey Brudda, Don't give up on us now. I for one always appreciate the knowledge that you have and your willingness to share it.
Ken

Ahhhh……..I guess I tend to run my mouth a bit, huh? Only way(s) I'm "leavin" here would be by Ryan's sword, or in a body bag, with neither choice sounding too exciting at the moment. And thank you for the kudos, Ken. Dick D (DD)
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 03:56 AM   #9
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

JSeery …...Here is a '35-'40 Ford chassis drawing compliments of Karl at Wescott. We still need a '41-'48 Ford drawing, plus the two Mercury drawings for comparative purposes. DD


1935-1940 Frame Drawing
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 35-40 Ford Chassis Drawing 2.pdf (73.7 KB, 43 views)
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE

Last edited by V8COOPMAN; 06-09-2020 at 04:05 AM.
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 03:57 AM   #10
35ragtop
Senior Member
 
35ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gold Coast , Australia
Posts: 249
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Excellent effort V8 Coopman. Its good to knowthis stuff when searching for bits.
You mentioned torque tube lenghts for 41-48 Mercury. I have just measured mine out of my 48 Mercury and its 72 inches. Actually I measured it at 1828mm which converts to 72 inches.
keep up the good work
Dave
35ragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 04:02 AM   #11
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Sorry...duplicate! DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 04:12 AM   #12
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 35ragtop View Post
Excellent effort V8 Coopman. Its good to knowthis stuff when searching for bits.
You mentioned torque tube lenghts for 41-48 Mercury. I have just measured mine out of my 48 Mercury and its 72 inches. Actually I measured it at 1828mm which converts to 72 inches.
keep up the good work
Dave

'Morning, Dave....That is so timely, and much appreciated. I shall add that info to the thread. This is partly how this compilation has come to be, through the efforts of many, like yourself.


Did you notice anything strange or noteworthy about the construction of that T-Tube? Likely not as it sounds to be the same as a '41-'48 Ford. Thank you again! DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 05:41 AM   #13
35ragtop
Senior Member
 
35ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gold Coast , Australia
Posts: 249
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Here is a photo of my 48 Mercury rear axle assembly. There does not appear to be any significant difference to the Ford ones.
My understanding is that the only differences are in the front length, hence the adaptor plate you mention above. This MAY be compensated for by the front engine mounts that you also mention, hence the torque tube being same as Ford.In other words the engine remains in the same location as the Fords but the extra lenght is from the firewall forward.
Sorry if this doesnt make sense.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg resized.jpg (64.6 KB, 244 views)
35ragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 05:50 AM   #14
glennpm
Senior Member
 
glennpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,965
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Great summary V8COOPMAN!


Thank you!
Glenn
glennpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 10:07 AM   #15
Karl Wescott
Senior Member
 
Karl Wescott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,265
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

1939 Mercury frame diagram and 1942-48 Ford/Mercury frame diagrams.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1939Mercury.jpg (69.1 KB, 796 views)
File Type: jpg Ford1942-48Frame.jpg (54.9 KB, 641 views)
File Type: jpg Mercury1942-48Frame.jpg (55.1 KB, 641 views)
Karl Wescott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 10:10 AM   #16
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8COOPMAN View Post
JSeery …...Here is a '35-'40 Ford chassis drawing compliments of Karl at Wescott. We still need a '41-'48 Ford drawing, plus the two Mercury drawings for comparative purposes. DD


1935-1940 Frame Drawing
Yes, was saying there should be Ford design drawings for the Merc frames. I have not idea how Ford engineering was organized, if they were in totally different locations or co-located. Same with engineering drawings, were they housed in the same facility or were they kept at different locations.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 10:32 AM   #17
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,106
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Wescott View Post
1939 Mercury frame diagram and 1942-48 Ford/Mercury frame diagrams.

My God Karl, you Sir are a gift from old Ford Heaven! I'm not surprised that you had this stuff tucked-away...I obviously just didn't have access, nor your blessings. You're very kind to share this with the FordBarn peanut gallery. Would I be asking TOO much if you also have the '35-'40 Ford drawing available here in a similar format, and rotated straight with the world like these current three drawings? I couldn't make that one post on the forum near as well as you can. If you have no objections, I'm going to incorporate these valuable drawings into this thread compilation, and certainly with credit to you. Many thanks again, Karl! Cool stuff, for sure. DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 10:57 AM   #18
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Well, there you go!
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 01:23 PM   #19
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,371
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Edsel Ford started the body design department in 1937 or so but the Ford engineering lab was built before that in 1924. When Bob Gregorie was hired to help with the Lincoln cars, Edsel put him over in the Ford Airport building that was across the street so that Henry wouldn't mess with him. Henry didn't care as much about the body design as he did the chassis & drive system. The Mercury was kind of a first major design change for Ford since they purchased Lincoln. Lincoln was always Edsel's baby since Henry didn't care much about the hoity toity cars. He felt it would give Edsel something to do where he wouldn't try to mess with the Ford line of cars. Henry would always put his foot down on the frame and would not allow much of any changes. The Mercury was a different car though and would have a longer design. Edsel finally found a way to get the longer frame that he always wanted but it was only longer by 4-inches. The 1st Generation Mercury body was completely different than the Ford line so I don't know where the firewall was in relation to the frame. It wasn't till 1941 that they started trying to use the same basic body as Ford but dress and accesorise it more. In 1942, there were a lot more things interchangeable between Ford & Mercury than there ever were before. The new design for 49 was when the Mercury line started to blend more with Lincoln than Ford but that only lasted a few years.

All the frames were designed by a different department in the Engineering Lab. Joe Galamb pretty much oversaw the frame design and production design that were going on and Henry was always around there to see what was going on and make them change things he didn't like. It's no coincidence that the Mercury frames are still a lot like the Ford counterparts.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2020, 06:46 PM   #20
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,774
Default Re: FORD/MERCURY 1939-1948...Differences (Re-Boot)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rotorwrench View Post
Lincoln was always Edsel's baby since Henry didn't care much about the hoity toity cars.



Yet, I've read that on Henry's trips to his winter home in Florida he rode in a Lincoln. Obviously he had figured long before that there was more money in selling a lot of low priced cars over selling just a few high profit cars. Maybe a case of "Do as I say, not as I do."

Last edited by 40 Deluxe; 06-09-2020 at 07:50 PM.
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.