Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2012, 07:12 PM   #1
46fatford
Senior Member
 
46fatford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 338
Default Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

I just noticed that in the January 2013 isue of HOT ROD magazine that there is an article by H&H flatheads where they test 12 different current production manifolds. I found it interesting and thought I would share it on the barn. If you do not have that issue, you can go to the website and view it as well.
Matt
__________________
"..Nothin' outrun my V8 Ford" (Chuck Berry)
S.M.I.B.
46fatford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 07:21 PM   #2
4tford
Senior Member
 
4tford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Regina Canada
Posts: 1,335
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

good article for sure.
4tford is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-19-2012, 07:29 PM   #3
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,859
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

They missed the Edelbroch and Offy super duals tho
Ol' Ron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 06:57 AM   #4
Dusters swe
Member
 
Dusters swe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SWE
Posts: 74
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...n/viewall.html
Dusters swe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 07:55 AM   #5
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,859
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

I still don't see the Edelbroch or Offy Super dual in the test??
Ol' Ron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 08:37 AM   #6
itsa52
Senior Member
 
itsa52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 603
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks for the link and heads up,, good article.
itsa52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 09:19 AM   #7
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

I was surprised to see the Thickstun PM7 2x2 did so poorly in comparison to other 2x2 intakes.
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 09:49 AM   #8
Henry/Kokomo
Senior Member
 
Henry/Kokomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 1,731
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Thanks, Matt. Good article. Wish they'd dynoed a Merc. manifold and 2GC for comparison.
Henry/Kokomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 10:44 AM   #9
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Edelbrock and offy supers do seem to be absent...I would bet money that those are the top two selling FH manifolds of all time, and popular also on racers before big inch strokers became normal. The su359 is probably the most historically popular manifold tested. Edelbrock current repro of the super dual was badly chosen, they picked the model with no bracket and no heat so that it will be a problem for most people, and I suspect that the Speedway iteration of the Offy has lost the two upper parts of the casting, though I'm not certain.
The Navarro super dual is visually much like the Edelbrock.
This is a VERY interesting article, and is going to need a lot of close reading!
Thickstun...I've always thought it was designed entirely with easy installation in mind. The hotter dual manifolds must have been nightmares for teenagers trying to install them on a Saturday...install, go back to store for generator bracket, find out the studs won't come out, back to store, break off studs, go weeping to a professional mechanic, buy lots more stuff, walk to work til next Saturday...AaaaaaRGH!
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 11:27 AM   #10
Ford Flathead
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 92
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

I could not bring every intake ever made, trust me my truck was loaded to the brim. I was on the dyno for 3 days and had to get back to work so I had to make some choices. I would have liked to test my Kong intake and some other 4x2 intakes but there was no time left. Plus we did do 90 pulls on my engine and figured it was enough. I do sell a good amount of the Edelbrock super duals but the Offy doesn't sell at all.
Ford Flathead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 11:32 AM   #11
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Thank you for making all this information available!
I would love to see a test of one of the 4 carb manifolds like Edelbrock that is close to an IR design. I've had a lot of discussion on this with people who ran them and the whole idea of the IR type approach is fascinating for an engine that is easy to over carb.
The old Offy Super dual was pretty tall, and each carb pad was obviously cast on from a separate layer of the molding apparatus. Looks to me like Speedway just eliminated that stuff and directly tapped the lower casting, lowering the whole manifold to almost the level of Fenton.

Last edited by Bruce Lancaster; 12-20-2012 at 11:42 AM.
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 12:02 PM   #12
richard rink
Member
 
richard rink's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: louisville ky
Posts: 91
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Mike and H&H, this article is an outstanding contribution to determining what truly works. Thanks for the providing the numbers. This is the kind of testing is out-of-reach for most; it's a pleasure to know, after all the years of the flathead's popularity, that there is still much to learn about tweaking its performance. Richard
richard rink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 12:23 PM   #13
Kahuna
Senior Member
 
Kahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

I think this is an excellent article, and agree that it would be nice to see more done with some of the 4 carb offerings. It seems that in all the tests, that the rpm/max power is around 4500-4700. I wonder if this is due to the cam chosen or that the engine could use more carburetion cfm. I'm thinking both
Kahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 04:07 PM   #14
my4dv8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,111
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Great tech article from h&h very useful as a base line in selecting a manifold from the hundreds out there. Sure can even get close to testing even the ones that are the next most popular. But this gives a great start and who knows maybe someone else may pick up and follow on from the H&H Dyno runs.
my4dv8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 04:34 PM   #15
Bassman/NZ
Senior Member
 
Bassman/NZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 2,001
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Back in the 60s a local hero had a single seater special that was flattie powered. It was bored, stroked, had all the tricks, and he was the NZ beach racing champion for a while. I asked him why he only ran a locally cast super dual type manifold on a big inch race engine, and he replied that he had tried many combinations, but the super dual type produced a seat of the pants improvement over all the other combinations he had tried. Interesting stuff.
Bassman/NZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 04:50 PM   #16
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

A link for those who have not read this great article:

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...old_smackdown/

I'm going to buy a copy of the magazine, too! I ran out of reasons to buy HRM a long time ago, but they deserve a sale for printing this!
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 04:56 PM   #17
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,859
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

JWL's Book "Flathead facts" published in '04 had a similar series of dyno tests including the super dual.
I ;oke the old Offy superdual and used them on the hydro and Bivele engines. I bores them out for 2GC carbs. They have considerably more meat on them. Also you can use the late Holley 2100 (54/6) Pickup carb
Ol' Ron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 07:23 PM   #18
Yoyodyne
Senior Member
 
Yoyodyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 535
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard rink View Post
Mike and H&H, this article is an outstanding contribution to determining what truly works. Thanks for the providing the numbers.
+1, lots of good data.

Anyone have information on how a Tattersfield manifold compares?
Yoyodyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 11:20 PM   #19
Dennis Jarrell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 101
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

I can't believe it will much different than the Thickston. The runners are abrupt at the base.
Dennis Jarrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 02:16 AM   #20
BillM
Senior Member
 
BillM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 504
Default Re: Hot rod magazine article on testing popular flathead manifolds

Joe Abbin did some dyno testing comparing an Offenhauser 3X2 to a Weiand 4X2; pretty much equal for the 284 cu. in. engine he was using. Here is a link: http://www.roadrunnerengineering.com...terOct2010.pdf
__________________
My web page:
http://myplace.frontier.com/~wgmumaw/
BillM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.