|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-01-2019, 07:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,840
|
Bearing dimentions
I'd like to get some dimensions for bearing thickness. I thought the standard bearing was . for the .220 mains and .o85 for the rods. Don't have a stock set to check. I have dozens of used bearings i used to get my clearances. when the crank is already ground. Memory isn't working today??
|
10-01-2019, 08:07 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Kansas
Posts: 897
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Hi,Ron
Believe it's .110" on mains and .085" rods. And Thank You for all your help on here! Terry |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
10-01-2019, 08:19 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,840
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
My eyesight is so bad I can't even read a mic with a magnifier. I just got a bearing mic from a friend and was looking for ..0025/.003" on a .010 main. guess I'll have to find another way, I read the Mic wrong. Thanks, very much.
|
10-01-2019, 08:30 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,259
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Geez Ron, that's terrible. I was just diagnosed with severe arthritis in my lower back and was feeling pretty sorry for myself, but I think I'd rather have my problem than yours; at least I can still sit on a stool at my bench and do a lot of stuff. Is there any chance they can do something to help you out?
|
10-01-2019, 08:34 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,141
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
I mean this will all due respect. Have you considered going to digital read out mics? There are some really good ones out there now.
|
10-01-2019, 11:27 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,840
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
10-02-2019, 03:24 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Hartford, Ct
Posts: 5,898
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Quote:
__________________
DON'T RECALL DOING SOMETHING FOR MYSELF BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S LIKES OR DISLIKES Last edited by 51 MERC-CT; 10-02-2019 at 08:05 AM. |
|
10-02-2019, 07:20 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn, MA
Posts: 2,106
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
I have taken pics with my phone to accurately read vernier scales. The pics can be enlarged. I think vernier scales will go the way of the slide rule.
__________________
“The technique of infamy is to start two lies at once and get people arguing heatedly over which is true.” ~ Ezra Pound |
10-02-2019, 07:57 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,141
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
|
10-02-2019, 08:39 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
I use a standard 1" mic and a flathead piston pin . . . been doing it that way for years.
|
10-02-2019, 08:42 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Also, I've learned my lesson with bearing sizes - as we don't have the +.001 and -.001 size options (in the standard under sizes) that we have in many modern engines. I now buy/setup my bearings FIRST, then I take extremely accurate measurements with a 3-point dial bore gauge, then I have the crank ground to match. Seems it is about the only way I can get exactly what I'm looking for (especially on the mains).
|
10-02-2019, 10:27 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,840
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Before I had a Bearing mic, I too, used the wrist pin method. But I never thought that was very accurate . This morning I used a magnifier hat and a light to read the mic, and that works very well, Your not going to believe this, but I have several hundred used bearings. So getting the right clearance was easy. Unfortunately, that was many years ago.
|
10-02-2019, 11:13 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,052
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Couple tips about the tools need to check ANY brg shell thicknesses.
You really need a very accurate micrometer, preferably one that does read in "tenths", and you should have a higher-end bore gauge (Sunnen for instance) to complement the micrometer. There are bore-gauge setting fixtures to work with this procedure also but not necessarily required? There is another extremely accurate way to get the brg thickness, it's by using a "height-gauge", it is almost a fool-proof method, and they're not really that all expensive. They read in "tenths" and are available with a digital read-out, ours don't have this option as we have a large choice of other tools to get the job done! Also, Dale has it correct to get a desired brg clearance, BUT, you don't have that "grinding-the-crank-size" option when ALL the components are "new", it isn't in play, for instance when you purchase a new stroker kit!! For correct clearances in this scenario you have very limited options for any correction! Thanks, Gary in N.Y. P.S. For most of our Flathead builds we "aim" for .002" on the mains, .002" on the rods. Usually we end up "right-in-the-ballpark"?? Anyway, here's a shot of a Chevy main shell being measured on the "height-gauge", this particular one just happens to be exactly .100" thick (the "probe" has a nice radius for the brg curvature)! Gauge made 1 full turn right back to "zero" and a shot of the bore gauge checking clearances.
__________________
http://www.stromberg-bulletin.com/me...berg-equipped/ |
10-02-2019, 02:31 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,840
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Tanks Gary for your input. Back when I was building engine I had two places where I could have my cranks ground. And I always had them give me an extra 1/2 thou under what ever size needed to clean up the journal. This way I could use the standard under size bearing. Made assembling the engines easier. Yes I have all that stuff like Mics and bore gauges and I never used them very much untill a fellow down country asked me if i knew that the new cam bearings were oversize. he foung one set with .006" clearance. This really hit me. I never checked the cam bearing clearance. Just put in new ones. On my next build I checked the clearance of the old bearings they wer .oo3 fnt .oo4 cent .oo3 rear. I checked the new bearings and they were .0025 +/_. Now I always check the cam bearings .
|
10-02-2019, 08:45 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,009
|
Re: Bearing dimentions
Quote:
I have a REALLY GOOD crank grinder - who has the equipment, experience and attitude to do amazing things. He took the brand new crank and ground it for another .001 of clearance . . . taking .0005 off the journal. Now THAT is precision work! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|