|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-09-2018, 11:54 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
[QUOTE
So, the question is this: what period (40s era) upgrades can be done to the Merc to improve its hill climbing ability? The drivetrain is rock solid on the 39 and on highways and surface streets, I dont have a single complaint. Weird request, I know, but Im interested to hear what you guys come up with. [/QUOTE] Here's an example of how Marmon-Herrington did it: [IMG][/IMG] |
08-09-2018, 05:41 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 23
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Quote:
Woah. I had no idea such a creature existed. Super neat. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
08-09-2018, 05:53 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,422
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
From what I understand, the transfer case has an early version compensator drive unit that allows the front axle to slip free of the drive system. More modern set ups are like a differential to a certain degree but those set ups were more like a detroit locker by comparison. When you turn sharply while it's shifted into compensating drive, it starts slipping like a rachet does. It makes a noise that sort of sounds that way but it allows one unit to rotate at a different rpm than the other. As long as you drive relatively straight, it makes no noise. They may have made noise but they did function OK.
|
08-09-2018, 10:13 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
|
08-09-2018, 10:18 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Too the op poster. Drive it, post pictures, and enjoy.
|
08-10-2018, 04:57 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,745
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
There are lots of videos on youtube. Mart. |
08-11-2018, 02:22 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
|
08-11-2018, 02:29 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
|
08-11-2018, 02:44 PM | #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Quote:
|
|
08-11-2018, 05:11 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Osos, CA
Posts: 83
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Interesting thread!
__________________
-Troy Zephaniah 3:17 |
08-11-2018, 06:11 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,422
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Thanks for that MH information MH Merc. I figured that drive compensator set up would look something like that. It has the dogs for direct and the rachet for a free wheeling affect. Sprag clutch technology was just starting to show up when the Lincoln cars got those first overdrive transmissions but that was a simpler way to deal with the problem at the time. Those CV joints were way ahead of there time. Most front wheel drive cars use the same technology now.
|
08-11-2018, 09:17 PM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Cool stuff, huh? I've had my Merc over 28 years - it's been really fun collecting and learning about M-H history.
|
08-11-2018, 11:44 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: At my kitchen table in Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 2,903
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
yes a pickup had a lower first and second gear.with my 36 pickup first gear was just to get it moving, and second you could do 25 mph. that was with a 411. now i have a 39 trans with taller first and second gear
__________________
If it would have been a snake it would have bit ya! i can't spell my way out of a paper bag! |
08-11-2018, 11:52 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: At my kitchen table in Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 2,903
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
i have seen your car, it sure was beautiful, sorry that you lost it
__________________
If it would have been a snake it would have bit ya! i can't spell my way out of a paper bag! |
08-12-2018, 02:41 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,745
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
I remembered the constant velocity joint is referred to as a Rzeppa joint. intrigued by the history I googled it and it turns out Harry Rzeppa was a Ford employee and patented the design in 1926 or 1927.
Mart. |
08-12-2018, 09:12 AM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
|
08-12-2018, 10:27 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Back to the original question: Some performance upgrades to the engine would surely help - with more compression (tighter head to piston quench) being the easiest one to do.
If I'm correct, the 39-40 Mercury had a somewhat unique rear-end situation - with a solid/integral drive shaft and pinion (like a Model A). Changing the rear-end ratio would require a whole new Mercury only driveshaft/pinion and ring gear setup. I don't see this as an option. A Columbia will not help your situation at all (it will provide over-drive ratios) - if just used with what you already have. Another solution would be to change the rear end to a 4.11 or 4.44 rear ratio with the more "normal" Ford style ring and pinion - which would help your hill climbs, but make highway cruising speeds lower. I'm not sure if a 4.11/4.44 set of Ford gears could be used with the Mercury banjo (anybody know?). Then you'd need to cut/customize the original Merc driveshaft to have a "coupler" like the Fords used. On top of the above, then you could add a Columbia setup - to give you "highway gears" in addition to your hill climb gears. These rear ends were the best original style solution in that everything works with your current chassis/frame/transmission setup. The downside of the 4.11/4.44 plus Columbia deal is that there is a lot of time and expense involved . . . Columbia rears (correctly rebuilt) are not cheap by any means. Good luck - glad to see you out there having fun with your ole' Merc . . . cool as Hell what you're up too! B&S |
08-13-2018, 04:19 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,508
|
Re: 39 Merc All Terrain Vehicle???
Are you sure the rear end is a 3:78? A lot of the Mercs came with 3:54 rears which would make it difficult on the hills. I have a 32 with 18" rubber, stock 85 (35) and a 3:78 that will climb hills very well and easily run 65 mph. I have Columbia's in my later stock flathead cars with 4:11 gears that will climb any mountain around here.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|