Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2024, 11:01 PM   #1
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 691
Default 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

How close in length is a late 24-stud with 8RT water pumps and transmission bellhousing to an early 24-stud from the transmission mating surface to the mounting holes on the water pumps?

I don't have all the parts necessary to measure it on my own, and haven't been able to piece it together from internet searches.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg LENGTH.jpg (6.9 KB, 21 views)
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 01:01 AM   #2
69a
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 145
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

Same!
69a is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-23-2024, 05:52 AM   #3
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,755
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

I don't know what the dimension is, but as stated it is the same. The only difference would be that the water pump pulleys will sit further forward with the 8BA motor.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 06:02 AM   #4
Mac VP
Senior Member
 
Mac VP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,361
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

The spacing issues have more to do with the cooling fan structure on the front of the engine….the front edge of the 49-53 fan blade is going to be situated closer to the radiator than the various earlier types of fans. This is generally the build problem with any Model A V8 and even the 32-38 Ford cars that the owner wants to use the late flathead in. There are work-arounds but modifications and compromises are required.
__________________
VANPELT SALES LLC
Cincinnati, Ohio
Office: 513-724-9486
www.vanpeltsales.com
www.classictransmission.com
Mac VP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 08:22 AM   #5
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,181
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac VP View Post
The spacing issues have more to do with the cooling fan structure on the front of the engine….the front edge of the 49-53 fan blade is going to be situated closer to the radiator than the various earlier types of fans. This is generally the build problem with any Model A V8 and even the 32-38 Ford cars that the owner wants to use the late flathead in. There are work-arounds but modifications and compromises are required.
100%. Dimensionally is one thing, add the pulleys, fans, etc. that same dimension can get a lot longer.

Most times, not all, the best plan is to use the charging and cooling bits from the year or close to it of the vehicle. Now, if you want to run the side post distributor, all bets are off since you need to clear that and the only way is with 8BA-type water pumps.
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 09:59 AM   #6
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 691
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks fellas.

How about the width between the two water pump mounting points? I forgot to ask about that.

I was aware of the additional length due to the pulleys on the later engines. My thoughts are to go to a 59A in a car that's currently set up for an 8RT, specifically because of the shallower belt/fan depth of the earlier engine. Length being the same helps avoid needing to reposition (or modify) the engine mounts on the frame.
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 10:05 AM   #7
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,319
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

It makes a difference whether the car is 1940 and earlier or '41-'48. The later cars have the mounting points higher relative to the frame than the pre-'41's.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 11:08 AM   #8
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,527
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

Widths are going to be the same.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 04:00 PM   #9
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

When using a late flatty in an older chasse. I like to use an electric fan. Much easies on the brain. Also a single belt generator, Altinator drive. Makes life much easier, and the ngine even looks better,
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 04:45 PM   #10
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 691
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubman View Post
It makes a difference whether the car is 1940 and earlier or '41-'48. The later cars have the mounting points higher relative to the frame than the pre-'41's.
Dang it. I forgot about the height difference.

The chassis has mounts set up for the 8RT. I suppose the flanges on the earlier pumps being lower wouldn't be the end of the world in this case as the transmission is a T5 and not a stock mount type. Might be enough to cause a firewall clearance issue, though, due to the tilt that would be induced.
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2024, 05:10 PM   #11
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,181
Default Re: 8RT vs Early 24-stud Length

Quote:
Originally Posted by itslow View Post
Dang it. I forgot about the height difference.

The chassis has mounts set up for the 8RT. I suppose the flanges on the earlier pumps being lower wouldn't be the end of the world in this case as the transmission is a T5 and not a stock mount type. Might be enough to cause a firewall clearance issue, though, due to the tilt that would be induced.
Mike,

Not a big deal at all. Easy enough to make spacers if you need it up higher. If you need it lower, a trick is to use '49-'50 Merc pumps. The mounting arm sits the motor lower than the 8BA/8RT pumps.

Tim
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 AM.