Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2013, 03:24 PM   #1
beast_3
Member
 
beast_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
Default universal joint problem

I'm posting this for a friend who isn't computer literate.
He replaced the universal joint in his '30 4-door recently and has developed a knock that sounds like it's coming from the area of the universal joint. It seems more noticeable after the engine has heated up a bit and when he let up on the gas or is cruising around 35 mph on a smooth city street.
He said its on tight and the covers are in place correctly. He thinks it may be hitting the inner cover.
The replacement and apparently is a foreign made part and the dealer told him was the only one available and they admitted it wasn't a perfect fit but only one made. His old one was the riveted style that apparently is not rebuild-able.

Anyway, does anyone have any experiences with these replacement U-joints and/or a fix for the noisy joint?

Or a source for a better repo part or good rebuilt U-joints?

Thanks!
Beast
beast_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 04:14 PM   #2
700rpm
Senior Member
 
700rpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 5,906
Default Re: universal joint problem

There is a special lock washer (A-7095 you can see a picture in Snyder's catalog)) that must be installed to hold the u-joint in its proper attitude. Was that installed?
__________________
Ray Horton, Portland, OR


As you go through life, keep your eye on the donut, not the hole.
700rpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-20-2013, 04:27 PM   #3
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Re: universal joint problem

I think there was a recent thread regarding this same subject. If I remember correctly the owner ended up slightly grinding the cover.
NOS joints are still available as are good originals.
Patrick L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 05:47 PM   #4
29er
Senior Member
 
29er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 465
Default Re: universal joint problem

Steve Mitchell told me he likes these for the Model A:

http://www.bobdrake.com/ItemForm.aspx?Item=HB-7090

Has anybody had any experience with them? They have needle bearings instead of the original bushings.
29er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 09:09 PM   #5
beast_3
Member
 
beast_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
Default Re: universal joint problem

I'm told that washer is installed correctly and tight.
I'll pass on the Bob Drake info.
Many thanks!
beast_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 09:56 PM   #6
Ron W
Senior Member
 
Ron W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Me.
Posts: 260
Default Re: universal joint problem

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
The joint sold by Bob Drake and others is not appropriate for the Model A. If it fits a V-8 it doesent fit the Model A. If you check the original you will find it is constructed so the cross can float radially. The "new" joints do not. That causes undue strain on the bearings in the transmission and torque tube. The best solution is to find a good original. That's what I did. Ron W
Ron W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 10:38 PM   #7
Bob C
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,754
Default Re: universal joint problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron W View Post
The joint sold by Bob Drake and others is not appropriate for the Model A. If it fits a V-8 it doesent fit the Model A. If you check the original you will find it is constructed so the cross can float radially. The "new" joints do not. That causes undue strain on the bearings in the transmission and torque tube. The best solution is to find a good original. That's what I did. Ron W

If this is true how come the Ford parts book shows u-joint part B-7090 1928-48

Bob
Bob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 10:42 PM   #8
quickchange
Senior Member
 
quickchange's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nelson. New Zealand
Posts: 2,009
Default Re: universal joint problem

used plenty of the V8 style ones. no problems, theyb were orig ones, Derek in Hot NZ
quickchange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 08:36 AM   #9
Ron W
Senior Member
 
Ron W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Me.
Posts: 260
Default Re: universal joint problem

Bob Drake's web site says,"Originally on 1936-48 Lincoln". If you cannot tell the difference between an original and the one being offered you may not understand why Beast 3's friend has a problem.
Bob C; I don't know what book you refer to but, I think you will find the part number for a Model A joint is A-7090.
quickchange; If the driveline is alligned well you may have no problem. The original joint was made with a floating cross to compensate for any misalignment in the driveline. Many people use the B-7090 and have no perceptible problem.
I chose to use the good original. You may choose what what you wish. Ron W
Ron W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 12:31 PM   #10
Bob C
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,754
Default Re: universal joint problem

A-7090 was changed to B-7090 in 1932, it's the same part.

Bob
Bob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 04:40 PM   #11
Ron W
Senior Member
 
Ron W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Me.
Posts: 260
Default Re: universal joint problem

It's not the same part! If the cross does not float, it's not an A-7090. If you can't tell them apart, you'll be happy with either one. I've explained the difference twice. That should be enough. If you would like to argue the point, don't do it here, send me a PM. Ron W
Ron W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 09:57 PM   #12
J Franklin
Senior Member
 
J Franklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,963
Default Re: universal joint problem

I would bet the Ford dealers were weaned off the original style U-joint to the later style because Ford did things by the #'s. Quantity equaled money and streamlined production. Also dealers would probably check and sell more driveline alignments. It would be interesting to see the parts books and dealer letters during those years.
J Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2013, 10:41 PM   #13
Bob C
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,754
Default Re: universal joint problem

Here's the 1932 parts book. The 1948 parts book shows the u-joint rebuild
kit B-7084 as used up to 1948.

Bob
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 7090.jpg (57.2 KB, 136 views)
Bob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2013, 06:53 AM   #14
Wallace
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East Texas
Posts: 77
Default Re: universal joint problem

Thank you, Bob. I needed to see this page for my own work. You'all have a good day. wk
Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2013, 09:21 AM   #15
Ron W
Senior Member
 
Ron W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Me.
Posts: 260
Default Re: universal joint problem

Apparently I am not very good at expressing myself. Bob is correct about the parts being sold by Ford in the 30

Last edited by Ron W; 11-22-2013 at 09:24 AM. Reason: message did not all come through
Ron W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2013, 09:30 AM   #16
Ron W
Senior Member
 
Ron W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Me.
Posts: 260
Default Re: universal joint problem

Even after editing the message was not complete? this is the last try.

Apparently I am not very good at expressing myself. Bob is correct about the parts being sold by Ford in the 30’s. They are not the same as parts being sold today under those numbers. I will try not to confuse you further by additional comment Ron W
Ron W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 02:13 PM   #17
beast_3
Member
 
beast_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
Default Re: universal joint problem

Thanks for all the advise guys. We're going to pull it out and check it out.
Cheers!
Beast
beast_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 04:33 AM   #18
Tony_47
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1
Default Re: universal joint problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron W View Post
The joint sold by Bob Drake and others is not appropriate for the Model A. If it fits a V-8 it doesent fit the Model A. If you check the original you will find it is constructed so the cross can float radially. The "new" joints do not. That causes undue strain on the bearings in the transmission and torque tube. The best solution is to find a good original. That's what I did. Ron W
I purchased a Bob Drake universal for my 29 A-Model Ford.

If you take the front bearing out of the torque tube it will work perfectly. The universal will locate the front of the rear drive shaft as it does for many cars from Nascars to Kenworth trucks. This is how Edsel Ford should have designed it in the first place.

The same will apply to all 28-48 fords.
Tony_47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 07:50 AM   #19
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: universal joint problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony_47 View Post
I purchased a Bob Drake universal for my 29 A-Model Ford.

If you take the front bearing out of the torque tube it will work perfectly. The universal will locate the front of the rear drive shaft as it does for many cars from Nascars to Kenworth trucks. This is how Edsel Ford should have designed it in the first place.

The same will apply to all 28-48 fords.
Since you don't want the front of the driveshaft to have any vibration where the speedometer gears meet, I'd rather use the drivehaft bearing and Ford's U joint.
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 08:25 AM   #20
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
Default Re: universal joint problem

If you look at page 564 of the model A service bulletins you will see what is thought of as the "V8" universal joint, in 32 all part #s that were carried over from the A got a "B" prefix, the parts that only fit the A stayed with the "A" prefix

If you take the driveshaft bearing out and let a "modern" u[-joint center the driveshaft the seal will have trouble with the sideways movement of the driveshaft ---and I don't think the speedo gear will like it that much either
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.