|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-07-2020, 02:25 PM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Ricks has been out of business for quite a while . About the only problem that I had with Ricks was that they didn't have a lot of the parts that they advertised . After having so many of my orders back ordered I changed vendors . I don't remember any real problems with the parts that I actually got from Ricks in the 70s . I think that a lot of the people didn't have a lot of experience fitting parts back in the day and blame it on Rick .
|
03-07-2020, 07:29 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Signal Mtn, TN (SE TN)
Posts: 2,370
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Except for some early mechanical parts that were provided by western auto, Sears et al most early parts were junk
Thanks to a very few (Al Lepore comes to mind) parts have evolved due to quality demands and folks catching on to what is junk. Unfortunately a lot ot $$ has been spent on the useable. There are currently are folks making quality parts. Modern techniques with CNC etc are helping One big hinderance is break even quality to produce. If the demand is maybe 100 and the break even quantity is 1000 there's a problem! Underlying answer is a $100 valued part would have to cost $1,000. Won’t happen! |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-03-2020, 10:59 AM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mebane NC
Posts: 2,350
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Quote:
|
|
07-03-2020, 12:42 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,304
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
I too have the beloved Ricks Restoration Manual it really wasnt that bad !!! Mine was well read you actually will read anything when you are towing an oil rig for weeks on end .Mine is disintergrating as maybe the spine binding glue was also made in Taiwan !!! . I keep it as it is nostalgia as well. I remember all those terrible repro parts in the seventies luckily the quality is vastly better now . Junction boxes ,rubber grommets which broke up when fitting to a rad shell etc etc and those headlight sockets .
John in windy Suffolk County England and congratulations on Independence Day . I blame the King he didnt have Skype to make it easier for both parties !!! |
07-03-2020, 01:12 PM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,848
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Ah, yes. Vintique. Here is a set of '30 cowl light arms Vintique made and sold thru a major name vendor (and it wasn't Mac's) Not only this but they don't even point the light in the correct direction.
Last edited by Y-Blockhead; 07-03-2020 at 01:26 PM. |
07-03-2020, 05:55 PM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pinckney, Mich.
Posts: 174
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
for my 29 tudor that he still had in an attic store room, mufflers, brake linings, dist.parts etc. |
07-04-2020, 10:37 AM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lee County Alabama
Posts: 828
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
You are right ericr, In the 1960s, NOS was to be had at most any old Ford dealership. Even today, I know of a building in Georgia FULL of Argentine parts, but not worth a drive to me. Jim...
|
07-04-2020, 09:55 PM | #68 |
Senior Member
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
I miss Mal's Model A sales and parts in Pacheo Calif. He sold quality and was willing to help. Late 1960's
|
07-05-2020, 11:32 PM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 160
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
I bought lots of stuff from Tommy Traylor's Specialized Auto Parts in the '60s when they were available and a trip to Houston was not out of the question. We began to see that a lot of their stuff 'wasn't quite right' but used it anyway. I probably still have some on my coupe... We used a set of Western Auto pistons that were still in the car 40 years later, though.
Mercifully, I seem to have been spared the Rick's debacle as we were not active with the coupe again until about 1990 or so, and by that time Traylor had gone down the river on a drug bust. I never heard of Rick's until now. Last edited by Tom Foster; 07-06-2020 at 02:44 PM. |
07-06-2020, 01:31 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ogden Utah
Posts: 242
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
When I first started in model As Rick was all I new.
When I found my first Snyder catalog and placed an order I was in heaven when I saw the difference in quality. |
07-06-2020, 08:26 AM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 930
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
"The dumbest reproduction parts" IMO are all the ones that don't fit. Seriously, I just don't get it. When someone reproduces a part, it should be just as easy to make it right as to make it wrong. Like bolt holes that don't line up. You gotta put the holes SOMEWHERE, why not put them in the RIGHT location. The only exception that I can think of off the top is castings. If you are using an original part as the pattern, any reproduced casting will be a bit smaller. However, even then, since we all know that the reproduced casting will be a bit smaller, it shouldn't be THAT difficult to build up the original with a heavy paint or something to allow for the shrinkage. I guess another would be stampings like fenders where the dies wear and it is cost prohibitive to make new ones. Then there is bolts and screws that are sold as "reproduction" when, in fact, they are just hardware store fasteners that will work but are NOT like the originals.
|
07-06-2020, 10:04 AM | #72 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,848
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Quote:
|
|
07-06-2020, 06:25 PM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Aiken, South Carolina
Posts: 695
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
I didn't read through this whole thread to see if anyone mentioned this, but how about the crap roller bearings being sold for the transmission? The ones Tom Endy has posted about and I also fell victim to? Yes, most of the better vendors are still selling them. If you use them, be prepared to tear down your transmission in less than 500 miles.
|
07-07-2020, 02:16 PM | #74 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 75
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
Backin 76 when I went through my coupe for the second time I bought new mushroom bolts for the running boards from Ricks. I'm not sure about the material but each snapped when tightening' Looking at the break it looked like they were pot metal. Good think I have kept all the "A" nuts and bolts I've taken off cars over the years(56) I've had mine.
|
07-08-2020, 10:58 AM | #75 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sedro-Woolley, WA
Posts: 1,023
|
Re: Dumbest Reproduction Parts
From Rick's in 1969, I purchased four new outer bumper clamps. They were pretty chrome and with their blue enamel paint already on them, they really looked nice. I proudly installed them onto our 1929 Tudor's bumpers. Later, the front bumper I found laying on the ground and there after I found one of the rear bumperettes was hanging from just it's rivets. With in a month, three of the bumper clamps had pulled their embedded hex headed capscrews out of their chrome plated CAST ALUMINUM faces. There after I searched out the original Ford "all steel" outer bumper clamps and I had them re-plated. Our Tudor is still wearing the "all steel" clamps today. Just another example of the poor quality reproduction parts that we fell victim to.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|