Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2012, 08:07 PM   #41
James Rogers
Senior Member
 
James Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
JS page 1-3 has a picture of the first 3 versions ... if you remove the breather pipe, invert it and look at the end. If you see a piece of steel baffle the runs across the inside of the tube, bisecting the pipe and even with the bottom of the pipe, then you have one of the first two versions that did not work too well.

If there is no metal baffle bisecting the pipe and the angled baffle is about 1 or one and 1/2 inches above the bottom then that is the later design pipe.
And it didn't work either. That's why the 32 pipe is larger with larger baffles and cap.
James Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 11:47 PM   #42
pat in Santa Cruz
Senior Member
 
pat in Santa Cruz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: santa cruz, calif
Posts: 2,011
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlG View Post
Do you have any pictures of the tube between the PCV valve and the carb, and/or specs on what PCV valve you used?
unfortunately no. I can get it, but it will be a while before I see it again.
pat in Santa Cruz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-06-2012, 12:17 PM   #43
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Pat, Since I already have the Weber, that sounds like a perfect solution. I often wondered what that extra open hole in the air cleaner was for! Any info you have on this would be great!
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 07:37 PM   #44
Old182
Senior Member
 
Old182's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 222
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Here's a pic of what I've used for the last 23 years: A plastic WD40 cap, drilled and placed in the oil filler cap - fits just right, doesn't allow much blowby, keeps the crankcase vented, and doesn't leak little pieces of steel.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg WDcap1.jpg (32.1 KB, 68 views)
Old182 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 08:51 PM   #45
James Rogers
Senior Member
 
James Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old182 View Post
Here's a pic of what I've used for the last 23 years: A plastic WD40 cap, drilled and placed in the oil filler cap - fits just right, doesn't allow much blowby, keeps the crankcase vented, and doesn't leak little pieces of steel.
I love it!!!
James Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 10:28 PM   #46
criswellnk
Senior Member
 
criswellnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit
Posts: 288
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
This is titled PCV'ING A MODEL "A" and is taken from Technically Speaking (vol. 7 pg. 113).



They list the oil filler cap and pcv vale as being Jeep-Eagle parts (cap J3220248 valve J3236675 and hose J8125841).
__________________
"Son, there are two ways to do this, your way and the right way." Thanks dad.


Looking for a copy or reprint of 1932 A.E.A. Universal Catalog of Genuine Electrical Service Parts
criswellnk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:04 PM   #47
TinCup
Senior Member
 
TinCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: OKC / Tonkawa, Ok.
Posts: 1,977
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

If I was going to put a pcv valve I like this setup better.
TinCup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:10 PM   #48
Milton
Senior Member
 
Milton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 837
Default Re: baffling loss of oil UPDATE

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBill View Post
Milton, can you explain? I don't see why the orientation of the baffles should make any difference at all.
To be honest, I don't either. But since the question was asked, I provided an answer based on an illustration in a Murry Fahnstock book.
Milton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.