|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-28-2016, 10:38 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sevierville, Tenn.
Posts: 391
|
vacuum advance.....or not.
I just hooked up the vacuum advance on my 46 59A, basically a stock motor .040 over with two 94's, crab distributor by Bubba's. But something has been haunting me. Do I remember reading somewhere that vacuum advance on a mild motor in a light car (29 AV8) is counterproductive or a waste at best?
|
12-29-2016, 01:49 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,962
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
If it works properly how could it possibly be a detriment or waste?
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
12-29-2016, 04:15 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,750
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
I don't ever remember reading that. Vac advance in an out and out race car is probably unnecessary, but very useful in any street driven car.
Mart. |
12-29-2016, 06:04 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: faucett, mo
Posts: 419
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
vacuum advance at idle means that the ignition timing is advanced which means the mixture is getting all burned up which helps the engine run cooler at idle.
|
12-29-2016, 06:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Vacuum advance is to compensate for running a leaner mixture in non full power operation.
For full power at a narrow rpm range you donīt need any kind of advance. For a wider range of rpm still only concearned about full power you need mechanical advance. For better fuel economy and keeping you engine running good at cruise you need vacuum advance. The beauty of the crab is that you can tune it to your cars need with the turn of a screwdriver. |
12-29-2016, 07:40 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
The most misunderstood part of a 1942-1948 Crab style distributor is the "vacuum brake". Often called by many a vacuum advance , with that not really being a correct name. The vacuum piston is hooked to manifold vacuum and has a piston with leather wear washer glued to the end. This leather washer drags on a advance ring inside the distributor causing the timing to slightly retard when vacuum is lower than spring setting. This should always be used even when the vacuum is not hooked up as it steadies the spark advance. When removed the advance jerk or jumps around quite a bit. Engine off= no vacuum causing the piston to push against the advance ring causing a slight retard when cranking. Engine running st idle , once the engine starts then the manifold vacuum will be strong causing the piston to pull away from advance ring causing a slight spark advance. Driving at highway speed with low loads this vacuum will keep the advance ring pulled away causing slight advance plus mechanical advance against spring tension of advance weights. Under loaded conditions ( low vacuum) the spring pushes the piston inward to advance ring causing a slight retard of ignition timing to prevent spark knock on hills etc... Note : Typically we ship the crab set at three turns inward on the spring for a light tension on advance ring. Ford suggests driving the vehicle with vacuum hooked up and turn outward until spark knock occurs on a slight load with throttle. Then turn adjustment in until it stops. |
12-29-2016, 09:43 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
>>>Ford suggests driving the vehicle with vacuum hooked up and turn outward until spark knock occurs on a slight load >>>
Well that's easy enough to say when the knock sensor works. But what if it doesn't work any more? Sure would be nice to have an inexpensive visual knock detector. Any suggestions? Jack E/NJ |
12-29-2016, 09:55 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Quote:
I think these 42 Fords didnt use a knock sensor. Those were on engines late 70s or so. Ford needed you to hear the kncok on acceleration with your ears. Most flatheads with todays fuel and low compression dont knock. In my case i wouldnt hear it if it did.. |
|
12-29-2016, 10:33 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,627
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Quote:
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin' My ragged ol' truck up and haulin' myself into town. Billy Joe Shaver |
|
12-29-2016, 11:18 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Jim>>>Most flatheads with todays fuel and low compression dont knock. In my case i wouldnt hear it if it did>>>
Well my 38 allegedly does, according to some of my much younger passengers. They said it sounds like a bunch of marbles being dropped on a sidewalk. So any suggestions on a cheap visual detector to see if they're telling me the truth? Jack E/NJ |
12-29-2016, 11:43 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
There are plenty of tools or at least was from the major brands but they cost...
Cheapest working i can think of is knocksense...knocksensor in block a blackbox and a led to tell you its pinging. http://www.viatrack.ca/ |
12-29-2016, 03:31 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
The knocksense doesn't look too bad. Does this mean I'd have to first choose a knock sensor from Amazon? Then order the knocksense box, cable and plug that would fit the sensor receptacle?
Jack E/NJ |
12-29-2016, 03:47 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
They supply you with a good tested one if you like.
|
12-29-2016, 04:05 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Wouldn't they need to know engine specs to choose the best sensor? Jack E/NJ
|
12-29-2016, 04:31 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,962
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Jack, it would be easier for you to round up a few kids with good hearing and make a contest to see who hears knock/pinging and reports first.
|
12-29-2016, 06:31 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
Maybe. But I've always liked the crisper response & better mileage that always seemed to come from setting a few degrees more advance than recommended even on 60s/70s engines/distributors. Enough so that it seemed worth using higher-test *and* driving more cautiously on hearing pings.
A car full of kids that *might* do the same thing today? I don't think so. That seems about as easy & practical as a new pair of super high-tech noise-cancelling digital hearing appliances from your local hearing-appliance dealer. However, seeing pings might work even better and cost less than hearing them once did for me in the old days. Jack E/NJ |
12-30-2016, 02:36 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McMinnville, TN
Posts: 2,327
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
I Personally don;t think that a flathead on today's grade of fuels is very susceptible to spark knock.
|
12-30-2016, 04:16 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
|
Re: vacuum advance.....or not.
I tend to agree. I'm chasing a surging in my engine at low rpm and wanted to eliminate the distributor advance as a cause. I put the load-a-matic distributor in with no vacuum connected. I inched up on the timing until I was at 20 degrees. It ran great, no kick back on starts, no pinging, winds up great through the gears. The engine has 130-140# of cranking compression. That setting will probably sacrifice some economy, but I couldn't tell it. Running regular 0 ethanol.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|