Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2016, 10:38 PM   #1
cuzncletus
Senior Member
 
cuzncletus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sevierville, Tenn.
Posts: 391
Default vacuum advance.....or not.

I just hooked up the vacuum advance on my 46 59A, basically a stock motor .040 over with two 94's, crab distributor by Bubba's. But something has been haunting me. Do I remember reading somewhere that vacuum advance on a mild motor in a light car (29 AV8) is counterproductive or a waste at best?
cuzncletus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 01:49 AM   #2
J Franklin
Senior Member
 
J Franklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,962
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

If it works properly how could it possibly be a detriment or waste?
J Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-29-2016, 04:15 AM   #3
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,750
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

I don't ever remember reading that. Vac advance in an out and out race car is probably unnecessary, but very useful in any street driven car.

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 06:04 AM   #4
fortyfords
Senior Member
 
fortyfords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: faucett, mo
Posts: 419
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

vacuum advance at idle means that the ignition timing is advanced which means the mixture is getting all burned up which helps the engine run cooler at idle.
fortyfords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 06:36 AM   #5
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Vacuum advance is to compensate for running a leaner mixture in non full power operation.
For full power at a narrow rpm range you donīt need any kind of advance.
For a wider range of rpm still only concearned about full power you need mechanical advance.
For better fuel economy and keeping you engine running good at cruise you need vacuum advance.
The beauty of the crab is that you can tune it to your cars need with the turn of a screwdriver.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 07:40 AM   #6
BUBBAS IGNITION
Senior Member
 
BUBBAS IGNITION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Crab Vacuum Brake Details:

The most misunderstood part of a 1942-1948 Crab style distributor is the "vacuum brake". Often called by many a vacuum advance , with that not really being a correct name.
The vacuum piston is hooked to manifold vacuum and has a piston with leather wear washer glued to the end. This leather washer drags on a advance ring inside the distributor causing the timing to slightly retard when vacuum is lower than spring setting.
This should always be used even when the vacuum is not hooked up as it steadies the spark advance.

When removed the advance jerk or jumps around quite a bit.

Engine off= no vacuum causing the piston to push against the advance ring causing a slight retard when cranking.
Engine running st idle , once the engine starts then the manifold vacuum will be strong causing the piston to pull away from advance ring causing a slight spark advance.
Driving at highway speed with low loads this vacuum will keep the advance ring pulled away causing slight advance plus mechanical advance against spring tension of advance weights.
Under loaded conditions ( low vacuum) the spring pushes the piston inward to advance ring causing a slight retard of ignition timing to prevent spark knock on hills etc...

Note : Typically we ship the crab set at three turns inward on the spring for a light tension on advance ring. Ford suggests driving the vehicle with vacuum hooked up and turn outward until spark knock occurs on a slight load with throttle. Then turn adjustment in until it stops.
__________________
If it Makes Spark, we do it !!!!
www.bubbasignition.com
[email protected]
BUBBAS IGNITION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 09:43 AM   #7
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

>>>Ford suggests driving the vehicle with vacuum hooked up and turn outward until spark knock occurs on a slight load >>>

Well that's easy enough to say when the knock sensor works. But what if it doesn't work any more? Sure would be nice to have an inexpensive visual knock detector. Any suggestions? Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 09:55 AM   #8
BUBBAS IGNITION
Senior Member
 
BUBBAS IGNITION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack E/NJ View Post
>>>Ford suggests driving the vehicle with vacuum hooked up and turn outward until spark knock occurs on a slight load >>>

Well that's easy enough to say when the knock sensor works. But what if it doesn't work any more? Sure would be nice to have an inexpensive visual knock detector. Any suggestions? Jack E/NJ
Jack,

I think these 42 Fords didnt use a knock sensor. Those were on engines late 70s or so. Ford needed you to hear the kncok on acceleration with your ears. Most flatheads with todays fuel and low compression dont knock.
In my case i wouldnt hear it if it did..
__________________
If it Makes Spark, we do it !!!!
www.bubbasignition.com
[email protected]
BUBBAS IGNITION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 10:33 AM   #9
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,627
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUBBAS IGNITION View Post
Jack,

I think these 42 Fords didnt use a knock sensor. Those were on engines late 70s or so. Ford needed you to hear the kncok on acceleration with your ears. Most flatheads with todays fuel and low compression dont knock.
In my case i wouldnt hear it if it did..
I have the same problem..... deaf in one ear and I don't much in the other one.... Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 11:18 AM   #10
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Jim>>>Most flatheads with todays fuel and low compression dont knock. In my case i wouldnt hear it if it did>>>

Well my 38 allegedly does, according to some of my much younger passengers. They said it sounds like a bunch of marbles being dropped on a sidewalk. So any suggestions on a cheap visual detector to see if they're telling me the truth? Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 11:43 AM   #11
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

There are plenty of tools or at least was from the major brands but they cost...
Cheapest working i can think of is knocksense...knocksensor in block a blackbox and a led to tell you its pinging.
http://www.viatrack.ca/
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:31 PM   #12
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

The knocksense doesn't look too bad. Does this mean I'd have to first choose a knock sensor from Amazon? Then order the knocksense box, cable and plug that would fit the sensor receptacle?

Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:47 PM   #13
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

They supply you with a good tested one if you like.
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 04:05 PM   #14
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Wouldn't they need to know engine specs to choose the best sensor? Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 04:31 PM   #15
J Franklin
Senior Member
 
J Franklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,962
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Jack, it would be easier for you to round up a few kids with good hearing and make a contest to see who hears knock/pinging and reports first.
J Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 06:31 PM   #16
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Maybe. But I've always liked the crisper response & better mileage that always seemed to come from setting a few degrees more advance than recommended even on 60s/70s engines/distributors. Enough so that it seemed worth using higher-test *and* driving more cautiously on hearing pings.

A car full of kids that *might* do the same thing today? I don't think so. That seems about as easy & practical as a new pair of super high-tech noise-cancelling digital hearing appliances from your local hearing-appliance dealer.

However, seeing pings might work even better and cost less than hearing them once did for me in the old days.

Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2016, 02:36 PM   #17
35fordtn
Senior Member
 
35fordtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McMinnville, TN
Posts: 2,327
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

I Personally don;t think that a flathead on today's grade of fuels is very susceptible to spark knock.
35fordtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2016, 04:16 PM   #18
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: vacuum advance.....or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 35fordtn View Post
I Personally don;t think that a flathead on today's grade of fuels is very susceptible to spark knock.
I tend to agree. I'm chasing a surging in my engine at low rpm and wanted to eliminate the distributor advance as a cause. I put the load-a-matic distributor in with no vacuum connected. I inched up on the timing until I was at 20 degrees. It ran great, no kick back on starts, no pinging, winds up great through the gears. The engine has 130-140# of cranking compression. That setting will probably sacrifice some economy, but I couldn't tell it. Running regular 0 ethanol.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.