Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2016, 09:30 AM   #1
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Does anyone have, or know where I can find, an illustrated overlay picture of a coupe/roadster/cabriolet rear fender compared to a sedan rear fender, for either '35 or '36? I know I have seen something like this before. I also know the coupe rear fenders are about 2" wider than sedan rear fenders at the top/center area, and I can personally tell the difference when looking at these fenders at swap meets, etc., but sometimes this can be difficult to explain to someone else without having samples of both to show the difference. Having an overlay picture would be the next best thing, and probably worth a thousand words.
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2016, 09:54 AM   #2
Don Rogers
Senior Member
 
Don Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wildwood, MO. (near St. Louis)
Posts: 1,792
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

John, I marked up this photo a few years back. Hope it helps.

Don
Attached Images
File Type: jpg rear fender large edit.jpg (17.9 KB, 220 views)
Don Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-23-2016, 10:12 AM   #3
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

That's what I remembered seeing. Thank you Don!
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2016, 11:50 AM   #4
Ball and Chain
Senior Member
 
Ball and Chain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 720
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Easiest way to pick up a fender at a swap meet and know what it is is:
7 mounting holes coupe, 8 for sedan

Quote:
Originally Posted by JM 35 Sedan View Post
Does anyone have, or know where I can find, an illustrated overlay picture of a coupe/roadster/cabriolet rear fender compared to a sedan rear fender, for either '35 or '36? I know I have seen something like this before. I also know the coupe rear fenders are about 2" wider than sedan rear fenders at the top/center area, and I can personally tell the difference when looking at these fenders at swap meets, etc., but sometimes this can be difficult to explain to someone else without having samples of both to show the difference. Having an overlay picture would be the next best thing, and probably worth a thousand words.
__________________
Throttle Benders
Est. 1949
Ball and Chain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2016, 12:56 PM   #5
FlatheadTed
Senior Member
 
FlatheadTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland
Posts: 4,705
Send a message via AIM to FlatheadTed
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

A trunk back is different, at the rear to a flat back ,Like longer! ,Ted
__________________
http://www.flatheadted.com


Flathead Ted brake Floaters ,
FlatheadTed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2016, 12:27 PM   #6
Don Rogers
Senior Member
 
Don Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wildwood, MO. (near St. Louis)
Posts: 1,792
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Ted, All 35 sedan rear fenders are the same. There is no difference between trunk back and flat back.

Regards,
Don
Don Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2016, 02:11 PM   #7
FlatheadTed
Senior Member
 
FlatheadTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland
Posts: 4,705
Send a message via AIM to FlatheadTed
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Don ,I have experienced this in comparing 35 fenders, if its not the length then there's a different shape at the rear .There's a indicator it in the 35/36 book On a trunk back touring sedan the body is 185.1/8 ,longer as opposed to the flat back 182.3/4 .Because the body is longer so I think the rear fender has to be to line up with the bumper, there is that extension on the chassis that makes it 2,3/8 longer . Ted
__________________
http://www.flatheadted.com


Flathead Ted brake Floaters ,

Last edited by FlatheadTed; 12-25-2016 at 02:40 PM.
FlatheadTed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2016, 06:05 PM   #8
glennsanders
Senior Member
 
glennsanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sharpsburg md
Posts: 480
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Are these coupe fenders
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20161226_153148243.jpg (26.2 KB, 55 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_20161226_153101317.jpg (47.0 KB, 58 views)
glennsanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2016, 06:15 PM   #9
Sid the Maineiac
Senior Member
 
Sid the Maineiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norridgewock,Maine
Posts: 657
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Please show the shape of the last 12 inches at the rear where they attach to the tailpan.That is where the major difference lies,I believe.
Sid the Maineiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2016, 07:02 PM   #10
glennsanders
Senior Member
 
glennsanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sharpsburg md
Posts: 480
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

They do have 7 mounting holes, measuring were Don had measured I think.
glennsanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2016, 01:22 AM   #11
Randy in ca
Senior Member
 
Randy in ca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,645
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Bumping this one back up to add a few pictures and identification help. As well as being wider and having a different number of over the top mounting holes, the coupe/roadster/cabriolet fenders have a much longer inside mounting bracket on the tail section with more mounting holes (3 or 4) than the sedan/phaeton fenders have (2). As long as these brackets are intact, it should take no more than a glance to differentiate between these two fender types.

-
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Fenders #1.jpg (24.9 KB, 95 views)
File Type: jpg Fenders #2.jpg (57.8 KB, 91 views)
File Type: jpg Fenders #3.jpg (91.0 KB, 94 views)
File Type: jpg Fenders #4.jpg (62.5 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg Fenders #5.jpg (46.0 KB, 88 views)
File Type: jpg Fenders #6.jpg (58.1 KB, 84 views)
Randy in ca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2016, 12:02 PM   #12
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy in ca View Post
Bumping this one back up to add a few pictures and identification help. As well as being wider and having a different number of over the top mounting holes, the coupe/roadster/cabriolet fenders have a much longer inside mounting bracket on the tail section with more mounting holes (3 or 4) than the sedan/phaeton fenders have (2). As long as these brackets are intact, it should take no more than a glance to differentiate between these two fender types.

-
Good info Randy. Copied your pictures to my files for future reference.
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2016, 04:12 PM   #13
glennsanders
Senior Member
 
glennsanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sharpsburg md
Posts: 480
Default Re: Another illustrated comparison request for '35/'36 rear fenders

Thank you ,You sure answered the questions about the fenders.
glennsanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.