Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2020, 01:15 AM   #1
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Question Stock versus Performance Cams

I'm rebuilding a C8BA. Will be bored around .030" over, had a Merc crank installed at one time, have three 97s on a Fenton Intake, original Eddie Meyer heads, Zephyr gears in a forties truck tranny I'm hoping can be fitted to a'32 tranny mount, and a '40 car rearend with undetermined gears at this time.

So I'm thinking a Shadbolt M60 cam, kind of like the Isky Max1, or staying stock. Any comments between the two cams? Good or bad... I'll most likely use adjustable lifters but will I need different valvesprings if I have my cam reground.

I've done research and all I got was Perplexed!
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 01:23 AM   #2
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Do a regrind or another cam. Not stock lift. In my opinion. Street or race? 3 pot will need some air flow.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-13-2020, 02:39 AM   #3
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I've got a MAX-1 in one engine (258 ci) and an 1CM in another (255 ci). Quite frankly, I can't tell the difference most of the time. They both idle nice and smooth. The MAX-1 seems to want to rev higher.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 04:55 AM   #4
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Matching heads to pistons will do more to performance in a normal car then a big cam.
What is the weight of the car ?
3 carbs is a lot for a stock setup...and usually more of a headache to maintain then itīs worth...
Big 97 center and blocking off the others comes to mind for a stock setup...and looks..
The mercury or EAB cam ainīt a bad choice for a fullsize car...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:35 AM   #5
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

The car is a '32 5W. I have been debating just using the centre carb and blocking off the other two. More to think about...
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:37 AM   #6
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
What about valve springs, if I went with the Shadbolt 60/ Max1 would different than stock springs be required?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:43 AM   #7
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

If you had a copy of JWL's book, you'd have the answer. Any cam with longer duration will kill of low end torque. Raising compression will increase torque through the entire RPM range. The engine you have is almost exactly like the one in his book. Getting his book could save you money.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:09 AM   #8
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunateson View Post
What about valve springs, if I went with the Shadbolt 60/ Max1 would different than stock springs be required?
A set of Isky 185-G springs (the same ones they supply with their MAX-1 cam and kit) are just a smidge over $100. It would be false economy not to purchase a set.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:56 AM   #9
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

What is your target rpm...what is valvetrain weight...how agressive is the cam...that will ad up to what springs you going to need.
Most people try and ad a LOT more springpressure to the mix then they actually need...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 11:02 AM   #10
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

"Murre" - You're right, but what's the fun in telling someone at a car show : "Yep, and then I installed a new set of stock valve springs."? "185-G" sounds technically impressive.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 11:23 AM   #11
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I would use the Lincoln Zephyr springs rather than the 185-G springs.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:00 PM   #12
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

For what it is worth, Gary (GOSFAST) over on the HAMB said that the Isky 185-G spring has a seat pressure of 80# at installed height of 2.000". I read somewhere that the Zephyr spring is 70#.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:29 PM   #13
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I don't see much difference in the seat pressure, but there seems to be a big difference in price. I see Michael has them for $39.95; that sure beats $108.95 for a set of 185-G's from Summit. I do see however, that the Zephyr springs say they are "stock spring pressure". Maybe Iskenderian thinks the MAX-1 needs stiffer springs?
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:58 PM   #14
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Zephyr springs isnīt that much tougher then the stock springs...i can measure a couple but if i remember right in the 60lbs neighbourhood...
Then there`s a lot of different things sold as "Zephyr" springs out there...
Stock 40lbs-Zephyr 60lbs-185G 85lbs...coarse estimate without any warranty...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 02:07 PM   #15
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I use stock springs with a .060" shims on all my street engines even with the L-100. I used athe short springs with rotators on the Maz #1 to improve the valve seat life. However I do use the Isky springs on the 400 jr All you need on the seat is 50lbs for most street cams, and a .060" spacer/shim is allot cheaper and works just fine

Now if you plan on turning 6500 at Bville, that's another story
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 03:58 PM   #16
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,431
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Yup, heavier seat pressure won't allow float at higher rpm but it depends on what a person wants to do with it. For high torque, the closer to stock stuff is better.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 05:29 PM   #17
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I'm like Ron. Shim stock springs or go with the Zephyr springs. 185 G's are pretty much unnecessary unless you have a really wild cam. How many street engines are ever revved to even 5000 rpm?
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 06:01 PM   #18
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,408
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

"Now if you plan on turning 6500 at Bville, that's another story".

6500 won't even get you in the show nowadays. LOL
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 06:09 PM   #19
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I do have Frank Oddo's book...
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 06:10 PM   #20
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by flatjack9 View Post
I'm like Ron. Shim stock springs or go with the Zephyr springs. 185 G's are pretty much unnecessary unless you have a really wild cam. How many street engines are ever revved to even 5000 rpm?
So what you are saying is as long as the original springs are in good shape use them, close I could get away with shims?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 07:55 PM   #21
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Ron View Post
If you had a copy of JWL's book, you'd have the answer. Any cam with longer duration will kill of low end torque. Raising compression will increase torque through the entire RPM range. The engine you have is almost exactly like the one in his book. Getting his book could save you money.

But you are also saying a reground or another cam is not a bad idea. Compression and porting aside.


Certainly buy the book. Ron I see your book and vanpelts. Both a good buy. But I don't see jwl on the vanpelts site??? Nothing wrong with reading.


http://www.vanpeltsales.com/FH_web/f...oksforsale.htm
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4755.jpg (39.1 KB, 19 views)

Last edited by Tinker; 03-13-2020 at 08:36 PM.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 08:41 PM   #22
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunateson View Post
So what you are saying is as long as the original springs are in good shape use them, close I could get away with shims?
Would need to check spring pressure at installed height to see if they are in good shape.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-13-2020, 08:46 PM   #23
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by flatjack9 View Post
Would need to check spring pressure at installed height to see if they are in good shape.
Yes, that is what I stated. But if they are close use shims? Or use shims if the valves are a wee bit short?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:02 PM   #24
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I'm still unclear why having zephyr springs (60#) is better then a cam? I don't know??? I run zephyrs on my 38 with a ground cam but I see little reason outside of saying and wearing lobes on a stock cam.


https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/...prings.836524/


.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:12 PM   #25
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

The cam shop owner when I phoned a few minutes ago says stock springs are ok but some use Lincoln Zephyr springs.
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:16 PM   #26
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Spring pressure is for keeping the valve on the cam lobe. Maybe at high speeds like mentioned before on this thread to remove valve flutter or float.


If you are going with a different performance cam. I say yes for sure.


If you are using the stock cam, I'm not understanding the over performance of the springs. I only say to learn. I'm asking. I don't know.

Last edited by Tinker; 03-13-2020 at 10:23 PM.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:42 PM   #27
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,834
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

The springs I use in all my builds with 100% satisfaction, irrespective of cam selection, are 'stock' progressively wound offerings as supplied by numerous dealers. The important thing is that there is no coil bind. My 2c
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit!
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 12:00 AM   #28
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
Spring pressure is for keeping the valve on the cam lobe. Maybe at high speeds like mentioned before on this thread to remove valve flutter or float.


If you are going with a different performance cam. I say yes for sure.


If you are using the stock cam, I'm not understanding the over performance of the springs. I only say to learn. I'm asking. I don't know.
That's the exact same reason I'm asking for help with this project. I'm really just learning myself and invoking the stored knowledge of the "mighty Ford Barn and the HAMB"...
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 12:13 AM   #29
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

If you are using a non stock cam go with some better spring pressure. If using the stock cam, I'd say 40-60# is fine. I big lumpy cam is not the ticket always also.

I go back to.. You need to get a little bit of something going to run 3 carbs. Maybe just heads are good. 3 carbs is a lot. As mentioned 1 center main and 2 outer dumps or dummies.




.

Last edited by Tinker; 03-14-2020 at 12:20 AM.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 08:54 AM   #30
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

The first thing you have to do is determine the operating range of the engine. Learn how to measure spring pressure at installed height. Just guessing what you have or need can be a disaster. once you've have the installed height, make a stop on a drill press and a bathroom scale and measure the pressure . I suggest 50lbs for most cams under 5k. Now if you plan on racing the engine, go with the cam manufactures recommendations.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 10:08 AM   #31
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

OL' Ron,

Thanks for the good tech tip. However, I'm letting the machine shop worry about spring height and pressure. I have full confidence in them.
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 12:10 PM   #32
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunateson View Post
OL' Ron,

Thanks for the good tech tip. However, I'm letting the machine shop worry about spring height and pressure. I have full confidence in them.
This has all been an informative thread, but part of the original post was "will I need different valvesprings if I have my cam reground".
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 03:09 PM   #33
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I would think so. However, what springs you should use would be dependant on the characteristics of the cam you will be using.

I recommended "185-G"'s for a MAX-1 clone, because that's what came with my MAX-1 from Iskenderian. I am not in a position to second guess the "Cam Father".
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 03:26 PM   #34
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Point is, he's leaving it to his machine shop to determine spring pressure, height, etc, after asking for opinions here and disregarding information Ol' Ron and others offered.

Last edited by 40cpe; 03-14-2020 at 03:31 PM.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 05:17 PM   #35
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

No disrespect for anyone involved, but this sounds like an uninformed value judgement to me.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 07:57 PM   #36
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40cpe View Post
Point is, he's leaving it to his machine shop to determine spring pressure, height, etc, after asking for opinions here and disregarding information Ol' Ron and others offered.
The point really is I'm leaving my machine shop to determine if the stock springs are up to spec. A further point is that I haven't disregarded a single thing as I'm considering all comments, except yours of course, in determining which way to go.... I'm doing research independent of this forum as well and am thinking stock, Zephyr, as well as the Isky springs.
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 08:26 PM   #37
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

deleted

Last edited by 40cpe; 03-14-2020 at 08:40 PM.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 09:09 PM   #38
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Why again was the question asked??? Cam?


Attached Images
File Type: jpg valves.jpg (164.7 KB, 9 views)

Last edited by Tinker; 03-14-2020 at 09:15 PM.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 09:49 PM   #39
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Yes, I was looking for guidance regarding stock versus performance cams. In listening to the pros and cons of both and speaking to my veteran cam grinder I will be going with Shadbolt's M70 ( though I posted M60).

That lead to info required as to valve springs. I read/heard about stock, LZ, and those supplied by Isky. My cam grinder said stock are fine but some go to LZ. I'm not going to be high revving this engine. I'm happy with good low end torque. Higher spring pressure I understand is for high revving and/or radical cams.

But stay tuned as this journey continues...

Last edited by Fortunateson; 03-14-2020 at 11:59 PM.
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:03 AM   #40
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Anything special about a C1BA cam?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2020, 11:28 PM   #41
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Well after working on my trans, converting a postwar light truck open drive trans to a closed drive system with most of the LZ stuff I went back to the cam question.

I'm leaning towards Ol'Ron's advice but them I found a little more out... I have two cams actually, one marked 8CM and the other EAC-A. Are either of these cams a good cam for my plans or should I get the Max1 style regrind? No sense spending money if there won't be a noticeable improvement.
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2020, 11:37 PM   #42
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

"Noticeable improvement" and "no sense spending money"? If either of those cams check out good, use it.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-16-2020, 12:23 AM   #43
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I'm not sure I get your meaning. Are you saying that both of those cams are very close to the Max1 so I should use them? Or are you being a little facetious?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 01:43 AM   #44
Phil Gillespie
Senior Member
 
Phil Gillespie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 1,611
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunateson View Post
I'm not sure I get your meaning. Are you saying that both of those cams are very close to the Max1 so I should use them? Or are you being a little facetious?
See comments on these cams in John Lawsons book Flathead Facts.
He has checked and dyno tested cams.
If I had the choice I would go with the Merc cam 8 CM.
Phil NZ

Last edited by Phil Gillespie; 04-16-2020 at 01:43 AM. Reason: correct title
Phil Gillespie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 01:45 AM   #45
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

What are you aiming for ?
You want to cruise mostly with good mileage...go merc cam and single carb !
That 32 will move as fast as you need...and then some..
You want lumpy idle...or have a real heavy rightfoot frequantly used...then maybe a more agressive cam.
I think overcamming and overcarbing engines is the most common fault made...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 01:59 AM   #46
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
It's a balance. No one thing is right.

Nice car. smoked a few transmissions and clutches.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 08:19 AM   #47
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I am serious. In my opinion, the "seat of the pants" increase in performance isn't worth the extra expense. The specifications of the 1CM are closer to a MAX-1 than a regular 8BA cam.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 09:11 AM   #48
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Go with the 8CM.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 11:58 AM   #49
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubman View Post
I am serious. In my opinion, the "seat of the pants" increase in performance isn't worth the extra expense. The specifications of the 1CM are closer to a MAX-1 than a regular 8BA cam.

Thank you and I hope you weren't offended by my comment. It seems that the 8CM is the one then. I bought the C8BA engine which never has had any machine work but the interesting part is that it came with a Merc crank, Pistons, and cam. Maybe the factory ran out of C8CM blocks that day...

Any imput on the EAC cam? I'd like to know just so I know for future reference. Thanks!

Last edited by Fortunateson; 04-16-2020 at 01:56 PM.
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 12:29 PM   #50
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,316
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I have no technical knowledge on the EAC cam, but would expect it to be as good or probably better than the earlier Mercury cam. That extra 15 HP in '52 and '53 didn't all come from an increase in compression.

Anybody have the specs?
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 12:33 PM   #51
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

The EAC cam is essentially the same as the 8CM.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 02:13 PM   #52
Ronnieroadster
Senior Member
 
Ronnieroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete View Post
"Now if you plan on turning 6500 at Bville, that's another story".

6500 won't even get you in the show nowadays. LOL



Pete stop giving away secrets! About the cam I like the 8CM good choice.
Ronnieroadster
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish.
"Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block"
Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline.
First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH
Ronnieroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 02:19 PM   #53
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,179
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunateson View Post
So what you are saying is as long as the original springs are in good shape use them, close I could get away with shims?
Original style or type. I would not even think of using used springs once everything is taking apart for a rebuild. Think of the absolute pain in the neck it would be to replace one if it broke. Stock -style springs are under $100. Cheap insurance in my book.
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2020, 02:19 PM   #54
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,179
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubman View Post
A set of Isky 185-G springs (the same ones they supply with their MAX-1 cam and kit) are just a smidge over $100. It would be false economy not to purchase a set.
Agree 100% with going with new springs.
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.