Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2014, 01:37 PM   #1
34 FORDOR
Member
 
34 FORDOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 95
Default 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

Hi guys, I would appreciate some advice. I am building a 276 ( mainly street use ) with Ross pistons and Navarro heads.I checked the piston and valve to head clearance with no head casket, using aluminium balls. Top of piston =.075 , outer edge = .045 , valves = .075. Was going to take .040 off heads to tighten up head to piston to head clearance but will this make the valves to tight and affect the breathing ? Do I need to do some work here? or should I leave things as they are.
34 FORDOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 01:55 PM   #2
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

For a street engine, run what you have.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-30-2014, 04:46 PM   #3
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,527
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

Take the .040 off. With the gasket you would have a minimum of .055 over the piston and plenty over the valves.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 05:40 PM   #4
36tudordeluxe
Senior Member
 
36tudordeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

I have a 276 also, Ross pistons but OFFENHAUSER heads. Milled the heads .020" but recut valve pockets back to .425" depth, wound up with .049 at piston edge and .094 at center and .090 over the valves, these clearances are not ideal for max. performance but suitable for street engine. Am using copper head gaskets, composites would have been a little tighter. With "flame paths" ground in the heads & spark plug holes countersunk and all of the above ended up with compression ratio of 8.7:1, not ideal either but okay. The Navarro heads of course would be different than the OFFENHAUSER.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg aluminapeas.jpg (51.0 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg flamepath.jpg (44.7 KB, 94 views)

Last edited by 36tudordeluxe; 03-30-2014 at 06:31 PM. Reason: Wrong heads!
36tudordeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 06:26 PM   #5
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

That is beautiful work. A while back someone posted a picture of an original cut-a-way cylinder, piston, and head. I seem to remember the tightest area was mid-way between the top and edge of the piston. I don't know how it looks with after market parts, but maybe prudent to measure there, too.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 06:33 PM   #6
36tudordeluxe
Senior Member
 
36tudordeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 40cpe View Post
That is beautiful work. A while back someone posted a picture of an original cut-a-way cylinder, piston, and head. I seem to remember the tightest area was mid-way between the top and edge of the piston. I don't know how it looks with after market parts, but maybe prudent to measure there, too.
At midpoint between edge and top I have .074" Thanks for the compliment.
36tudordeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 06:41 PM   #7
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by 36tudordeluxe View Post
At midpoint between edge and top I have .074" Thanks for the compliment.
Good on you!
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 06:55 PM   #8
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

I'm glad to see people doing this. Unfortunately the piston and cylinder head manufactures can't decide what radius the pistons should be and thus we don't get optimum performance doing this. I have a domoing tool that I made for the Ross pistons, the Egges seem to be closer to the head manufactures. Having ,045 around the edge is the plan, be nice if it could continue further to the center, bur run it.


It's the journey, not the destination
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 08:14 PM   #9
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,409
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Ron View Post
I'm glad to see people doing this. Unfortunately the piston and cylinder head manufactures can't decide what radius the pistons should be and thus we don't get optimum performance doing this. I have a domoing tool that I made for the Ross pistons, the Egges seem to be closer to the head manufactures. Having ,045 around the edge is the plan, be nice if it could continue further to the center, bur run it.
It's the journey, not the destination

It would be nice if there were industry standards for street type
piston domes and head domes so they would match. It's not likely
to happen though.
For one off jobs it is fairly easy to do but for street engines
most people won't pay for all the little things that need to be done
even if they can afford them.
It's the little things that make people say after you have taken
them for a ride, "holy cow, what did you do to this thing, my 276
sure doesn't go like this one".
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 09:56 PM   #10
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

I love riding in a car with a properly built engine. I have a friend with a 296 that must have 30K on it and when he stands on it it moves. Warms the cockles of my heart.
It's the journey, not the destination.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 12:50 AM   #11
34 FORDOR
Member
 
34 FORDOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 95
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

Thanks for all the replies, good to hear from you guys with a wealth of experience. Will have to sleep on it and decide, sweet dreams, leave as is ? or remove .040? Do those "Flame paths " help or is it all snake oil ? There was a story in "Secrets of speed" ( 4 bangers mag) about a guy in India doing some trials and it sounded fairly convincing.

Last edited by 34 FORDOR; 03-31-2014 at 12:52 AM. Reason: bad spelling
34 FORDOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 05:41 AM   #12
JWL
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fitzgerald, Georgia
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

If you read my book you will see how I angle mill heads to achieve the most desirable squish condition within the limits of the "as-received" components.
JWL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 06:28 AM   #13
awelker
Member
 
awelker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Berrysburg, PA
Posts: 49
Default Re: 276 Cu in " Head Clearance

I found with my last engine build that the Ross piston domes matched very nicely with the new Edelbrock heads. With the Offenhauser heads they were as others described, no where close to matching.
__________________

www.vonwelker.com

https://www.flickr.com/photos/vonwelker/albums
Home of the Blonde Bitch Bellytank
awelker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.