03-22-2012, 07:45 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
|
Re: Serial number
Quote:
|
|
03-22-2012, 07:49 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
|
Re: Serial number
BTW, in NC when the title to any car is transferred, the old title is surrendered to the DMV so, I could never have kept even the title from the second owner. I did see it when I signed it and surrendered it and the transfer date to the second owner was Jan. 1963. Funny story about that date but too long to type.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-22-2012, 08:20 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,534
|
Re: Serial number
Quote:
Again, for the purpose of MARC/MAFCA adjudication, the judges do not care if the engine number matches the frame number, --nor do they care if the engine number matches the number on the title. The only thing the Area 1 judges care about is whether that number matches the timeline the owner is classifying his vehicle's build-date as. A 'Variance' is the same thing as an "exception" or a Free Pass. If someone is granted a variance for something, then the Judge is instructed to accept what the J/S Committee is allowing for this instance without any deduction for not following what is written in the Judging Standards. Playing Devil's Advocate with George's book, how do you know what he has listed is actually factual? As we all know, this book has many errors and mistated facts that have been proven otherwise since the book was last published. In his defense, that information was thought to be gospel however in additional research some things have been found to be different than initially thought. This info has come from studying Engineering Releases, Prints, and logs. Therefore, how do we know for a fact that his statement about how/when the frame was stamped is actually factual?? Where do we suppose he garnered that info?? Last edited by BRENT in 10-uh-C; 03-22-2012 at 08:26 PM. |
|
03-22-2012, 08:38 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
|
Re: Serial number
I guess when you get right down to it, he could be as wrong or as right as any of us without factual documentation from the original manifests. It does give some credence to the theory that it happened. Now to find out how he arrived at this conclusion. I hate to get something like this on my mind. It will worry me till I find out for sure.
|
03-22-2012, 09:29 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 914
|
Re: Serial number
the only documentation I've seen (doesn't mean there isn't any, it means the only documentation I've seen) is from the American Machinist magazine of 1928, step 27. "Hang engine assembly on overhead conveyor, place in chassis and prop in place. Stamp motor number on left side member near clutch pedal". The 3 months is for judging only. It was 'invented' to allow for the large number of engines in float. The attached photo is the long beach plant in 1931. All of the engines were assembled in Detroit, stamped with a number then shipped to different assembly plants. The engines were not used in any order, and so could be (for judging) up to 3 months earlier than the vehicle assembly date. Remember you are building to a date for fine point judging. All the parts will be restored to original specs, but the car won't be 'restored', but built to a date. Restoration is bringing the car back to original condition by restoring what was there. Preservation is holding the car in time as found. These are my definitions. Fine point=built to a standard for a particular date. Preservation is maintaining the car as is. Restoration is built to as new, but not necessarily to standard.
|
03-22-2012, 11:28 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mill Creek WA.
Posts: 341
|
Re: Serial number
|
03-23-2012, 07:38 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 492
|
Re: Serial number
Since I've rekindled my love affair with Model As, maybe it's time to visit the archives/library at "The Henry Ford" museum. So many things were taken for granted or just plain ignored for so long, and these days collectors want to know it all. Clearly there's new questions to ask, and even though the answers may or may not effect judging they still give us insights as to the "A to Zs" of Model A production. I think we do better work knowing more about a car than it's fuctions and colors.
|
03-23-2012, 09:10 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,392
|
Re: Serial number
A new question while we're on this subject. Any one wonder/know why the frame S/N was placed UNDER the body and not 6" in front where only the fender would cover it??
Paul in CT |
03-23-2012, 10:37 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,534
|
Re: Serial number
Quote:
|
|
03-23-2012, 11:34 AM | #30 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: Serial number
So...where/how would stamping location and requirement be documented?? I don't thingk the parts drawings themselves would contain this, as serial had nothing to do with the manufature of the frame or rail and there was not any special pad or feature of frame at the number location.
And of course it wouldn't be in a change letter if it was done like this from car number one on...how were assembly procedures documented, what document did all those change letters change? A thought on the hidden location: Ford USA started stamping frames in late 1925 on Model T's. The location chosen for T's was about the same as on A's...but made more sense, because it was visible with only the wooden part of floorboard removed. Perhaps that procedure simply stayed in place because there was no change order issued in the transition?? Some edict on where to stamp issued in December 1925 just stayed in force by simple inertia? |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|