Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2019, 06:32 AM   #21
34PKUP
Senior Member
 
34PKUP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 794
Default Re: Mercury crank

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOSFAST View Post
Hi Tom, without a doubt, have all 4 tapped. The nice part about the Merc's starting with the 5/8" plugs is they don't need drilling, they're already the correct size to just tap for the 3/8" NPT thread!

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. In all my time doing these builds we've literally done hundreds of those crank holes, more than 90% were Merc's, we did some Ford's way back in time.
Just curious, why is it necessary to take the time and effort to tap holes and insert threaded plugs? When the original Ford type plugs were used on literally millions of cranks (not hundreds) without any problems (known to me).
34PKUP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 07:06 AM   #22
Desoto291Hemi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Carthage , Tennessee
Posts: 199
Default Re: Mercury crank

I would venture to guess that it is just a safety precaution.
One less thing that could go wrong,,,you know.

We tend to run more pressure in our engines now,,,,so a plug could possibly blow out.
Also,,,,you need to remove them to clean the passages . So might be a good time to upgrade. Of course,,,like you said,,a plug worked for millions of engines before.

However,,,I will probably use a fair amount more oil pressure,,,so,,,I know what direction I am leaning towards.
Thanks for the reply Gary.

Tommy
Desoto291Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 10-26-2019, 08:52 AM   #23
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,778
Default Re: Mercury crank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desoto291Hemi View Post
I would venture to guess that it is just a safety precaution.
One less thing that could go wrong,,,you know.

We tend to run more pressure in our engines now,,,,so a plug could possibly blow out.
Also,,,,you need to remove them to clean the passages . So might be a good time to upgrade. Of course,,,like you said,,a plug worked for millions of engines before.

However,,,I will probably use a fair amount more oil pressure,,,so,,,I know what direction I am leaning towards.
Thanks for the reply Gary.

Tommy

Why "use a fair amount more oil pressure"? Is it really needed? It will heat the oil more by churning it through the bypass valve as well as require more horsepower to drive the oil pump. Bearings are lubricated by the hydrodynamic wedge action of a rotating shaft. The oil pump merely supplies the needed oil to the bearing.
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 09:12 AM   #24
Desoto291Hemi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Carthage , Tennessee
Posts: 199
Default Re: Mercury crank

Well my reasoning is I have heard many stories of only 10 pounds of pressure before.
I am sure that some engines will live with that,,,,,but,,,the stresses placed on a high performance engine are greater.
Yes,,,the hydrodynamic wedge is there,,,,but,,the added load is detrimental to the oil film provided on the journal.
The load against the journal doesn’t just increase,,,but it could increase by the square,,or even the cube.

Also,,,some oil passages are not as friendly to good flow as others are.
Some cranks are machined where the oil passages actually act as a pump themselves.
The angle of the passage,,,the angle the oil hole comes out on the rod at top stroke.
This can act as a pumping action,,by centrifugal force,,,,it literally helps sling the oil through the crank.

Also,,,,during some high rpm,,,high load forces,,,the oil can stop in its tracks,,,,,for just a millisecond,,,.
There are a lot of forces involved,,,,that is why they went from just dippers and oil slingers.
The power levels got to the point that it couldn’t lubricate anymore and the pressurized oil systems were created
Then later,,,,the full filtration filter systems evolved as well.

I don’t plan on too much pressure,,,I like to have al least about 30 or so at hot idle,,,then around 60 at RPM.
Just my observations.

Tommy
Desoto291Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 09:21 AM   #25
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: Mercury crank

I've got over 60,000 miles on my engine and the oil pressure never drops below 30 lbs. 60 at startup. This is with a stock 8BA pump. The 10 lb stories are old history.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 09:34 AM   #26
Desoto291Hemi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Carthage , Tennessee
Posts: 199
Default Re: Mercury crank

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Hey Flatjack,

Good to hear that.
Like I said,,,I don’t intend to use too much pressure,,,just a fair amount.
By the way,,,what pump do you use,,,stock type Ford,,,Melling?

Tommy
Desoto291Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 10:23 AM   #27
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,302
Default Re: Mercury crank

I don't think you can beat a stock ford pump if it's in good condition. Certainly don't use a Speedway Motors pump. I put one in a brand new engine and it only made 15 lbs at hot idle. I replaced it with a known good Ford (tested by none other than "flatjack9"), and my hot idle is now 35 lbs.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 10:55 AM   #28
Desoto291Hemi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Carthage , Tennessee
Posts: 199
Default Re: Mercury crank

Awesome Denny.
That is information that I can use.

Since this is a crank thread.
What about the Merc cranks,,,,do they hold up well in stock form,,,or should they be modified for oil flow?
This flathead stuff fascinates me,,,I’m like a kid in a candy store.

Tommy
Desoto291Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 02:11 PM   #29
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,062
Default Re: Mercury crank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Ayers View Post
Ron,

Have you found that the extra weight impacts fuel economy in any way?
There is a severe impact --- due to the heavier Merc crank, I have found that I have had to counterbalance that with a heavier foot on the gas pedal . . . the net result is that my mileage tends to suffer . . .
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 06:44 PM   #30
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
Default Re: Mercury crank

Flatjack9, 10/30 oil??
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2019, 07:02 PM   #31
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: Mercury crank

Yes
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.