Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2015, 11:39 AM   #1
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Speaking of counter weighted cranks

I did not want to hi-jack the other thread.

I'm just wondering if it is worth adding counterweights. Or not.
Patrick L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 11:54 AM   #2
Kevin in NJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South East NJ
Posts: 3,398
Default Re: Speaking of counter weighted cranks

If you have a properly balanced and properly rebuilt to factory specs A engine (and driveline) you would expect to be able to run 60 MPH for extended periods of time and get 50,000 to 80,000 miles with that engine.

So the answer is you do not need the counter balance to have a good running reliable car that will go tens of thousands of miles. The key is getting back to factory tolerances with the balance on the rotating parts.

The issue is when you have imbalances in the crank damaging the bearings.

Now a factory crank is somewhat imbalanced, but we know that long term reliability shows it will last for a very long time. This is based on decades of use of the Model A when it was a new car.

That being said.

If you have the money and really intend to push the car hard for tens of thousands of miles then spending the extra bucks for counter weighting may make sense. Properly done the counter weights will improve the balance of the engine.

Realistically, probably 90% of the counter balanced engines never see enough miles to make a difference. Just paying for a proper rebuild back to factory balance specs is your best money spent.
Kevin in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 09-18-2015, 02:19 PM   #3
Kahuna
Senior Member
 
Kahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,617
Default Re: Speaking of counter weighted cranks

Agree with Kevin 100%
Kahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 02:54 PM   #4
MikeK
Senior Member
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
Default Re: Speaking of counter weighted cranks

Just to set the record straight about "balanced" cranks, all stock A cranks were very well balanced by Ford. This is well documented in literature and photographs. Adding dynamic balance with counterweights only serves to counteract a few thousanths flex along the centerline, which cams out bearings and fatigue cracks cranks. It does NOT result in any noticable, seat-of-the-pants improvement unless other problems have been fixed concurrently. New A engines ran smooth- 'till the center main cammed out. THAT is what adding counterweights fixes- the UNNOTICEABLE crank flex along its centerline.

If you want to watch a 30 second video of a crank dancing, even WITH both counterweights, a snout damper, and five mains, watch THIS. Only the main bearings hold it straight. Not having counterweights, even if the crank is in perfect dynamic balance does not prevent flex from centripital force. It only increases cyclic loading on the block mains.

Spend the money for counterweights or better still- a stiffer alloy counterweighted crank like a Scat.
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2015, 08:42 AM   #5
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Re: Speaking of counter weighted cranks

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
OK, thanks
Patrick L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.