Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-29-2013, 10:45 PM   #1
woodburnranch
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Geraldine, Montana
Posts: 76
Default Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I'm looking at a 49-53 engine and would buy it if I could determine it is a Merc without disassembly. The oil filter canister has a "STRATO STAR V8" logo. Any tips would be helpful. Thanks. Jim
woodburnranch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2013, 10:58 PM   #2
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Measure the stroke. 4" = Merc. 3-3/4" = Ford. Measurement can be done through sparkplug hole using a nylon tie strap. The blocks are the same. Crankshafts and pistons are different.
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein

Last edited by JM 35 Sedan; 11-29-2013 at 11:03 PM.
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-30-2013, 06:13 AM   #3
V8ER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: near Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 403
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

STRATO STAR V8 LOGO was used for 52-53 Ford.
V8ER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 06:33 AM   #4
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,749
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JM 35 Sedan View Post
Measurement can be done through sparkplug hole using a nylon tie strap.
Can it? I wouldn't have thought that was possible or reliable enough. Not criticising, just curious.

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 08:50 AM   #5
Andy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kerrville, Tx
Posts: 2,769
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Whern't the Merc heads marked 8CM and 1CM? I had one that was painted a light blue green. i think Fords were dark blue
I don't think the stroke can be measured without pulling the pan or a head.
Andy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 09:38 AM   #6
itsa52
Senior Member
 
itsa52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 603
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
If the heads are Merc script and the carburetor is 4 bolt it's a good bet it's a Merc..but no guarantee.
I think Any is right on 49-51.. 52/53 are Mercury and EAC
itsa52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 10:15 AM   #7
louisb
Senior Member
 
louisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 175
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Until you open it up there is no telling what it is inside.

--louis
louisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 03:11 PM   #8
my4dv8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,111
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

With the 4 bolt side inlet carb and 8cm or 1cm on the heads you would assume it to be a merc but assuming could make an ASS out of U and ME.
my4dv8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 03:40 PM   #9
oldford2
Senior Member
 
oldford2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pittsfield, MA
Posts: 2,086
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I have a 52 Mercury engine and the heads are marked:

Mercury EAC
oldford2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013, 05:17 PM   #10
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Now days a guy can't get too picky about the crankshaft unless you are just looking for a 4-inch crank. A good 8BA block is a good start if the price is right. The crank you can pick up separate or buy one of the pricy new ones.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 06:53 PM   #11
Bob/Ohio
Senior Member
 
Bob/Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: N.E.Ohio
Posts: 222
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I bought a flathead that was in a 47 Ford dump truck, a few years ago that had a Ford head on one side and a Mercury on the other. Had a 50/50 chance, and it turned out to be a Mercury when I tore it down and checked the crank.
Bob/Ohio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 07:06 PM   #12
itsa52
Senior Member
 
itsa52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 603
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Yeah with them being 60 years old they all have a lot of history, and they only sure way is to tear them down. I still feel if the heads are Merc and the manifold is Merc the chance are better than 50/50 it's a Merc. Nobody ever put Merc heads on to get more power.
Then the next thing is if it is a Merc crank, how many times has it been ground.. I'm not a big fan of 30/30's as I am sure a lot of them are that small or even smaller.
Conversely I an sure there are a lot of 8BAs with a three bolt carb supporting a Merc crank.
With the spark plug hole over the valves, checking stroke with any dip stick is going to be gamey at best
itsa52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 07:16 PM   #13
Bob/Ohio
Senior Member
 
Bob/Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: N.E.Ohio
Posts: 222
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Your right about the undersize on the crank, the surface hardness is only so deep, and 0.030 under is about max on most cranks. I have seen some 0.040 under, but where are you going to get bearings these days. You used to be able to buy bearings in many under sizes, but now your lucky to find much more that 0.010/0.020 under, even for a small block Chevy.
Bob/Ohio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 08:04 PM   #14
Binx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Gloucester VA
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Okay woodburnranch, you've got some encyclopedia-class information now. How are we doing?

Lonnie
Binx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 09:12 PM   #15
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,936
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Don't forget, even if it was once a Merc engine, someone could have installed a Ford crank at some point in its life. Also, check the distributer part # to see if its a Merc distributor. Check the cover on the oil pump idler gear to see if it has a Merc part #on it. This one is cast iron, off a 51 Merc.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3331b.jpg (61.9 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3332b.jpg (59.6 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_8831best small.jpg (59.3 KB, 47 views)

Last edited by 19Fordy; 12-01-2013 at 09:23 PM.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 10:13 PM   #16
41LjH
Senior Member
 
41LjH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NW North Carolina
Posts: 461
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

JM 35 Sedan is right on.

The Merc is a stroked 239.4....

If the stoke is 4", it's probably a Merc. All the other parts, intake, heads, etc. bolt on to a 8BA block. So like JM 35 Sedan said just put a zip tie or small dowel rod in the #1 spark plug hole get #1 to TDC, mark the measuring device and turn the engine until #5 is TDC,(this puts #1 at BDC) mark the measuring device again. If the distance between the marks is 4" you either have a Merc or a 8BA with a 4" crank. Either way you have the torque potential you want.
__________________
3 pedals, 3 gears, no valve-covers..
Now THAT is a hot rod !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmwwB34vxJE
41LjH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 10:27 PM   #17
r_reed
Senior Member
 
r_reed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: east glenville NY
Posts: 158
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

as said above, i don't think the piston is directly below the spark plug hole. all i remember seeing in my EAB was the valves. i didn't think a dowel would work. seems like you either have to take a head off to measure piston travel, or if the crank is out, put it in a stand and measure top to bottom.
__________________
1949 F-1 Flatrod II (flat paint, flat motor)
Keeping one more flathead alive
It smoked, but gave it up 7/26/2013
East Glenville NY
r_reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 10:48 PM   #18
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,860
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

So if I stroke a 4" cramk to 4 1/8 and turn it to 1,998 It will ware out to fast because it soft. Where do you guys get this stuff.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 11:01 PM   #19
Ronnie
Senior Member
 
Ronnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada Where it snows
Posts: 2,058
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Ron View Post
So if I stroke a 4" cramk to 4 1/8 and turn it to 1,998 It will ware out to fast because it soft. Where do you guys get this stuff.

Its in their drinking water Ron. They read it on a forum on the internet. "LOL"

R
Ronnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 11:05 PM   #20
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by r_reed View Post
as said above, i don't think the piston is directly below the spark plug hole. all i remember seeing in my EAB was the valves. i didn't think a dowel would work. seems like you either have to take a head off to measure piston travel, or if the crank is out, put it in a stand and measure top to bottom.
Right. Remove the plug and all you will see is the exhaust valve. No way to measure the stroke without removing the head or pan.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 09:10 PM   #21
woodburnranch
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Geraldine, Montana
Posts: 76
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Thanks for all the info. I'm betting its a Ford with the "Strato Star V8" logo and no other Mercury indications and will proceed accordingly.
woodburnranch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 11:32 AM   #22
lefty rodan
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 31
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I'm no expert but I've had at least 15 4" merc cranks and the surefire method of determining size in my experience is to remove the pan and measure the width of the counterweights---six inches or more in width and it's a merc. Also measure the diameter of the sludge traps--5/8 " and it's usually a merc though I've had two Canadian merc cranks with the ford 3/8" diameter. Tim Ayres and I shared some merc cranks years ago and if memory serves correct both also had a raised casting dimple on the counterweights that apparently was peculiar to the Canadian variety of 4" cranks. Lefty Rodan
lefty rodan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-04-2013, 10:06 PM   #23
Ross F-1
Senior Member
 
Ross F-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Fordy View Post
Check the cover on the oil pump idler gear to see if it has a Merc part #on it. This one is cast iron, off a 51 Merc.
Why on earth would there be a Merc-specific cover? There's no difference in them back there, is there??
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead
Ross F-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 10:52 PM   #24
quickchange34
Senior Member
 
quickchange34's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: charlottesville, Va.
Posts: 589
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

There is no difference in the covers, most are cast and some of the later ones were stamped steel. There is no cover just for merc.
quickchange34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 11:20 PM   #25
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

There definitely is a cover with a Merc part number cast in it.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 11:52 AM   #26
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
It must have been in the early stages of development in 38/39. I've seen the pics of the transmission cases with the 99A prefix so nothing would surprise me much. My later mid century cars both have the generic stamped cover of the 8BA family. A photo would be good though.

Last edited by rotorwrench; 12-05-2013 at 01:39 PM.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 12:16 PM   #27
Jefscoupe
Senior Member
 
Jefscoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Millington, TN
Posts: 101
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

My local guru suggested to me to get the Scat crank kit from Speedway.
Pick your bore & stroke and you get crank, H-beam rods, pistons (all forged) rod bearings and rings.
All new and balanced ready to install.
For about $1800. He said he can't buy the same parts and prep a crank and balance it all for that.
Main bearings sold seperately depending on early or late block.
He tells me this after I've tracked down the original stuff.
Jefscoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:20 PM   #28
Flatkid8
Member
 
Flatkid8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Anderson, IN
Posts: 44
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I don't see how in the world you could accurately measure stroke through #1 plug hole of a Flathead. I have 2 complete Mercs in the garage (1 pulled from a 53 and the other from a 50) and I will test the myth today and report back with a confirm or bust. Perhaps it would be possible with aftermarket heads if the plug hole is positioned slightly different, but im anticipating this test with stock heads to be impossible.

Dennis
Flatkid8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:47 PM   #29
Ross F-1
Senior Member
 
Ross F-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I can't imagine it being accurate, but I bet it can be done.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Zip Tie.jpg (19.4 KB, 7 views)
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead
Ross F-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 01:51 PM   #30
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

A person can use a tye strap to find TDC since the big end can be pushed in there to block the piston from going any further up then rotate the assembly back around to the other side till the piston stops again & mark the crank pulley at both stops. Find center between stops and that is a relatively accurate measure of TDC unless the tye strap flips on its side during one of the top outs but I don't think it will as long as the part that is outside the cylinder remains flat against something. Other than barely being able to tell if the valves are opening/closing, that's about all you can do with the heads on there. The only other way would be by volume but you would have to know whether it was ever bored oversize or not plus the fluid would probably run past the worn out rings anyway.

Pull the head & measure the stroke if the assembly still rotates or pull the pan and measure across the crank counterweight cheeks as was already mentioned.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 02:06 PM   #31
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,936
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross F-1 View Post
Why on earth would there be a Merc-specific cover? There's no difference in them back there, is there??
My thinking is that if the engine still has that green Merc oil pump idler gear cover with the same part #, it may be a 1951 Merc engine instead of a Ford since that is a part that would normally NOT have been changed on an original Merc engine. Therefore, it might be a clue that the engine in question is a Merc. Yes, stamped steel covers were made also. In fact, the Mercury Manual shown) gives a pictorial of the CM oil pump idler gear cover. It is shown as being made of stamped steel. No part # is on it. It would be interesting to see if there are any differences in the idler oil gear components since the internal depth dimensions of the cast cover and steel cover are different. Anyone know? Such info.may be helpful to the "purist" who is building a 100 point restoration and also wants the parts that you don't see to be 100% original.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3331b.jpg (61.9 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3332b.jpg (59.6 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3383b.jpg (62.0 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3384b.jpg (76.6 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3385b.jpg (58.6 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3386b.jpg (55.6 KB, 7 views)

Last edited by 19Fordy; 12-06-2013 at 10:40 AM.
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 02:35 PM   #32
19Fordy
Senior Member
 
19Fordy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,936
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefscoupe View Post
My local guru suggested to me to get the Scat crank kit from Speedway.
Pick your bore & stroke and you get crank, H-beam rods, pistons (all forged) rod bearings and rings.
All new and balanced ready to install.
For about $1800. He said he can't buy the same parts and prep a crank and balance it all for that.
Main bearings sold seperately depending on early or late block.
He tells me this after I've tracked down the original stuff.
I wonder if you have to "re-balance" those SCAT cranks?
19Fordy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 03:59 PM   #33
JM 35 Sedan
Senior Member
 
JM 35 Sedan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Near Rising Sun, Maryland
Posts: 10,858
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Fordy View Post
I wonder if you have to "re-balance" those SCAT cranks?
I did have to balance mine when I put a 4-1/8" SCAT crankshaft in a 59, 284 ci engine that I built six years ago. The balance was way off. Maybe they have improved there manufacturing methods since then, but being made in China...who knows. One of the well known engine builders on the West Coast claims he does not need to balance them
__________________
John

"Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts". Albert Einstein

Last edited by JM 35 Sedan; 12-05-2013 at 04:13 PM.
JM 35 Sedan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2013, 07:30 PM   #34
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

I noticed that the part number was 1CM on that cover. Most of the 1CM part changes had something to do with the Merc-O-Matic. That big torque converter may have worried them some. The other cast covers I've seen were mostly in trucks but they didn't have the mercury part number as I recall. Both of my Mercury cars are 51s but both are early and they have the early type manual shift with overdrive. The later parts book lists that cover for 51 to 53 Mercury cars.

A lot of aftermarket crankshaft manufacturers were concerned to make a part that could be balanced by removal of material instead of adding weight. Most folks that I've seen comment about these cranks mention that they had to remove a fair amount of metal to get them to balance. A lot depends on the weight of the rods & pistons used so one size doesn't fit all in that respect with all the different parts available. That depends on how a person wants to build it.

Last edited by rotorwrench; 12-05-2013 at 07:39 PM.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 09:24 AM   #35
Jefscoupe
Senior Member
 
Jefscoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Millington, TN
Posts: 101
Default Re: Ford or Merc 49-53 engine ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Fordy View Post
I wonder if you have to "re-balance" those SCAT cranks?
The new kits are "advertised" as being balanced components.
Now, I've not gotten one...yet...so I can't say for sure.

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/1939-5...4-CI,5401.html

My local guru has built several flatheads recently using this assembly and is convinced they are worth it.
Jefscoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.