Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2022, 03:32 AM   #21
34PKUP
Senior Member
 
34PKUP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 794
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnieroadster View Post
I realize your working with a 59A style oil pan. To help with a design for the latter 8ba block Ford actual made an oil pan that includes a complete windage tray assembly it was used on Mercury engines which of course also had the 4 inch stroke crankshafts. If you were able to look at the Mercury oil pan Ford used on the latter 8BA block you will see a perfect example of what to do. The oil pump pickup for this oil pan is an added bonus which you could use on the 59A. The pickup includes metal around the pickup screen area that helps add further windage protection. You could actually use that Mercury pick up with your oil pump and have a good start on what to design around the factory part.

For those who may feel this is a foolish idea take a moment and wonder why Ford would go to all the trouble of designing and including such a foolish idea for a stock flathead. There's actually a simple answer because it actually works. I know on my engines it works heck even the tuners who loose when racing against me know this as well.
Ronnieroadster
Well, I guess that even Ford felt it was foolish or why would they eliminate the windage tray in the '52 and '53 Mercury 4 inch stroke flathead?
34PKUP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2022, 05:22 AM   #22
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,070
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Who knows about what Ford did and didn't do . . . in many cases things were done to save costs. Also, at the lower RPMs that most folks ran their engines - probably didn't make a whole lot of difference.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 08-24-2022, 10:04 AM   #23
khschs
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 70
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

A little investigating has yielded a few pictures of the 49-53 Merc pan and windage tray. It seems that with some modification the tray portion could be fitted to the 59A pan. Might even be simpler to just fab a new one.
Thanks to everyone who has responded .
Keith
khschs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 11:22 AM   #24
Tim Ayers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,181
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Quote:
Originally Posted by 34PKUP View Post
Well, I guess that even Ford felt it was foolish or why would they eliminate the windage tray in the '52 and '53 Mercury 4 inch stroke flathead?
This logic is flawed. Why auto companies do things is beyond anyone's guess. Mostly its done to save money.
Tim Ayers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 11:49 AM   #25
solidaxle
Senior Member
 
solidaxle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnieroadster View Post
I realize your working with a 59A style oil pan. To help with a design for the latter 8ba block Ford actual made an oil pan that includes a complete windage tray assembly it was used on Mercury engines which of course also had the 4 inch stroke crankshafts. If you were able to look at the Mercury oil pan Ford used on the latter 8BA block you will see a perfect example of what to do. The oil pump pickup for this oil pan is an added bonus which you could use on the 59A. The pickup includes metal around the pickup screen area that helps add further windage protection. You could actually use that Mercury pick up with your oil pump and have a good start on what to design around the factory part.

For those who may feel this is a foolish idea take a moment and wonder why Ford would go to all the trouble of designing and including such a foolish idea for a stock flathead. There's actually a simple answer because it actually works. I know on my engines it works heck even the tuners who loose when racing against me know this as well.
Ronnieroadster

Here's what I believe is a "51" pan Ronnie mentions.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg oil pan.jpg (86.5 KB, 34 views)
File Type: jpg oil pan full.jpg (65.5 KB, 44 views)
solidaxle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2022, 02:29 AM   #26
frnkeore
Senior Member
 
frnkeore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 782
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I'm late to this.

As for HP, most windage trays will be in the single digits. Many claim no HP increase. I've only run one, back in the 60's, on a 427 and did no A/B test, to see if it increased HP.

Anything you can do, to control the oil will be beneficial, especially in keeping the upper oil, off the crank. Try to route it to the front and rear of the engine. Little things here and there can always help.

Regarding the pictured 49/51 pan, it is not a windage tray, that is a baffle and a fairly well designed one. Great for cornering, stops, starts and steep hills.

It separates the aerated oil from the pan oil but, doesn't to anything to control and condense that oil.

Ford may have added it to see if it reduced warranty claims, found it didn't and removed it from the last two years. My only guess?
__________________
Frank
'35 Ford Model 51
'48 Ford F3
'54 Ford Tudor Mainline
frnkeore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2022, 12:13 PM   #27
khschs
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 70
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

I think I have come up with a plan "A" (least used plan in the world).
Fabricate a tray closely resembling that used on the 50s Mercury. I think that it will improve oil control and should be rather simple to fabricate.
It would be helpful,however, if I could get a few dimensions off an original Merc pan. Any help along that line would be appreciated.
Keith
khschs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2022, 08:21 PM   #28
Ronnieroadster
Senior Member
 
Ronnieroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,530
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Keith I can help with some measurements of the windage tray installed in the Mercury pan and the correct pickup as well send me a PM.
Ronnieroadster
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish.
"Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block"
Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline.
First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH
Ronnieroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 10:40 AM   #29
51 MERC-CT
Senior Member
 
51 MERC-CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Hartford, Ct
Posts: 5,898
Default Re: Windage tray yes or no

Some observations made some time ago on location of tray.
__________________
DON'T RECALL DOING SOMETHING FOR MYSELF BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S LIKES OR DISLIKES
51 MERC-CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.