|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-15-2021, 07:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
|
Columbia rear ratios
What do you guys think. I'm installing a Columbia two speed. I have 3.54gears, 39 transmission, 7.00 x 16 tires. Is this to tall with the columbia? Running just the stock banjo it always seemed like I need one more gear. Should I change the ring and pinion to 4.11?
|
05-15-2021, 07:46 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,258
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
It will work but The 4:11 will work better or a 3:78. I had a 47 coupe with the 6 cylinder and it had a Columbia with a 3:54 gear and it pulled it fine but it had 600x16 tires on the rear. If you’re driving in mostly flat ground it’ll be fine. If you’re in hilly terrain you’ll hate it.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
05-16-2021, 12:17 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,571
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
I have a 4.11 in mine, if I did it again i would have 3.78 in the midwest plains. mountain states, maybe 4.11. where do you drive, how much on the freeway, its all relevant.
|
05-16-2021, 12:33 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,312
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
I think it depends on your engine. I have a '51 coupe with a straight transmission (no overdrive) and 3.55's. I have a pretty stout Mercury engine in it, and everything is fine with it, except that I keep wanting to "grab that extra gear" on the highway. I was thinking about picking up a 4.11 "chunk", but decided that I will stay with the 3.55's for the time being.
I'm not going to win any drag races anyway, and I think I'll be able to pull them at anything over 60. (Things are also pretty flat up here in north central Minnesota.) EDIT : I forgot to mention that I am putting an OD transmission in the car this summer. Last edited by tubman; 05-16-2021 at 08:36 AM. |
05-16-2021, 07:00 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
I have 3.78 gearing in my 32 and I like this ratio with my Columbia. Delightful and quieter cruising.
|
05-16-2021, 07:38 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: allison park pa
Posts: 89
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
05-16-2021, 07:45 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Forgot to mention that I have 1939 transmission with 25-22-18-14, 19T main, Zephyer gears in the roadster.
|
05-16-2021, 08:05 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,064
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
It is important to consider the final overdrive ratio - given your tire sizes. I'm building a Columbia for my 32 with a 4.44 (because I have a very big cam in it and I'd like more low-speed acceleration). The OD ratio is 28%, so my final gear ratio will be 3.2. With this gear ratio and my tire size of 29.5" in the rear, it will be running about 2550 RPM at 70 MPH - which is just fine by me. If I started with 4.11 gears, the final ratio would be 2.96 - or 2360 RPM at 70 mph. Both of these RPM ranges are just fine for me and my style of driving.
Now - if I was going across the United States at 70 mph, then I might consider the 3.78 gears as my starting point - they'd drop the RPMs to 2177 . . . which would be about perfect for long distance driving - yet still give the car have enough acceleration from a standing stop to please the driver. It all comes down to what you want out of the car, where you plan to drive (and how much), etc.. Also, consider the whole package (like your brakes, suspension, steering, tire type, etc). I'm not sure I'd like to be traveling in my 32 Cabriolet at 70 mph for many hours at a time . . . even with all new suspension, Lincoln brakes, etc.. It could use some sway bars, it could use some seat belts, it could use a lot of things to make a long trip at 70 mph a more pleasant ride. |
05-16-2021, 08:06 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,157
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Here's a chart, don't know how to make it larger though
|
05-16-2021, 08:09 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,064
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Here is a link to a site that has all sorts of automotive calculators:
http://wallaceracing.com/calc-gear-tire-rpm-mph.php |
05-16-2021, 08:25 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
It's mostly hilly to flat around here. I prefer staying off the major highways. Motor is a stock 8ba 239 with a blower. I had the car for 7years so I know how it takes the hills with the stock 3:54 gears. At times I need to shift down to second on the back road hills, revs are up and mph is slower, I'm thinking it's only a plus to have the 2-sp, I can then up shift 2nd high. My concern is on the flat or marginal hill it will fall on it's face. My thought is, as others have suggested the 3:78 would be a good choice but is it worth the effort to go from 3:54 to 3:78? It's not that big of a jump.
|
05-16-2021, 09:30 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wiscasset, Maine
Posts: 1,981
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Ratio comparisons that I have for my roadster
|
05-16-2021, 10:03 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Thanks guys. I leaning on leaving the 3:54 in and see how it goes. The Columbia can only improve things even with the 3:54's. I should have it on the road again in a couple of weeks and let you know.
|
05-16-2021, 01:57 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,107
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
Larger! DD
|
05-16-2021, 11:39 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Masterton, New Zealand
Posts: 3,832
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
That's a very helpful chart, thanks!!
__________________
Unfortunately, two half wits don't make a whole wit! |
05-17-2021, 12:21 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
cropped and larger without fussing the text. Thought Kurt's post was big enough.
|
05-17-2021, 10:19 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sedro-Woolley, WA
Posts: 1,023
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
I have had Columbia overdrives in my 1936 4 dr sedan, in my 1936 panel delivery, and also in my 1947 Sportsman. All were stock engines for their years. I used 3.78 rear axle gears in all of them and I was very happy with all of them. Unless you live in a flat area, 3.54 gearing wouldn't see much Columbia overdrive use.
|
05-17-2021, 12:58 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
I think you are correct, 3:78 would be a better choice.
|
05-19-2021, 07:24 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 478
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
So I have been looking for 3:78 gears. What years would fit my late 32 banjo. It's the wider center section and the scalloped torque tube connection. I'm not seeing anything at Mac's, C&G, Early Ford parts except the 28-32 ones.
|
05-19-2021, 08:36 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Powell, TN
Posts: 2,509
|
Re: Columbia rear ratios
The later 32-34 ring gear and pinion will fit your late 32 housing. Difference between it and the later 35-48 banjo housing is that it is narrower.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|