|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-05-2019, 04:01 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
|
.100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Due to budget limitations, my 8BA will be rebuilt with the stock heads, intake, camshaft and crankshaft.
I bought a set of .060” oversized pistons but it still didn't give a clean bore. The machine shop suggested sleeving the block, but I thought about moving to .100" over, which would be the minimum needed bore to clean the cylinder walls. The problem is I already have two sets of pistons (.040" and.060"), so it would be cheaper to sleeve the block and bore it .060" (since importing new pistons from the U.S. to Brazil would double their price due to taxes, plus the shipping cost, which also doubles because of taxes). It seems to be commonsense that most 8BA blocks can be safely bored to .125 over, but also seems to be commonsense that you should sonic test the block prior to doing so. I’ cannot risk ruining this block, because good flathead blocks are really hard to come by in Brazil, and are quite expensive to. So, to justify going big bore (and over my budget), I ask: 1) If I can’t sonic test the block, is it safe to go .100 or .125, or would it be safer sleeving the block and bore it .040 or .060 and use the pistons that I already have? 2) If it’s safe, would a .100 bore give a justifiable increase in torque or power even with stock 8BA heads, intake, cam and crank (in comparison to the .060”)? 3) Would .125 be even better (if it's really safe)? Building this engine has been a long time dream and if I ruin this block I don’t think I can afford a new one, so I really need to be on the safe side. Thanks! |
03-05-2019, 04:24 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
There´s nothing like safe when dealing with 50+ year old engines...if it was run with pure water it may be badly rusted in the waterjackets.
You can get the torq cheaper by raising compression milling the heads then bying a new set of bigbore pistons... If you have the pistons and sleeves...use them...just my 2c |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
03-05-2019, 04:55 PM | #3 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Sonic testing would be way cheaper than messing up a block! It can't be that expensive, what are they asking for the testing? But, I agree with flatheadmurre, sleeve it and you will have a block that will almost last forever.
|
03-05-2019, 06:46 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: WA state
Posts: 771
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
+.080 8BA pistons and rings are quite available also.
|
03-05-2019, 07:23 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Riff Raff >>>I bought a set of .060” oversized pistons but it still didn't give a clean bore.>>>
You've already got the 60s. So just how UNclean was the bore? I've had blocks with pretty deep gouges and scratches here & there. Not perfect but no excessive oil smoke, consumption or other noticeable side effects except I knew they were there. I got over it. 8^) Jack E/N |
03-05-2019, 07:40 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,857
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
03-05-2019, 09:57 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
expect to "maybe" having some overheating issues if this is going into a driver.
No replacement for displacement. But max bore on an engine out the gate seems extreme (if it's a street car). I assume you have pitting that the .60 didn't fix? What about .80 over, if you do whole hog you are still needing new pistons. If you bore out to .1 and it still doesn't work you can sleeve it. Just be aware of possible heat and thin walls. Flatheads, joy of spending money. ugh. Best of luck. Last edited by Tinker; 03-05-2019 at 10:50 PM. |
03-05-2019, 11:01 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
My engine is bored 1/8" over and have never had any heating problems. This is with a stock radiator with no pressure cap.
|
03-05-2019, 11:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
|
03-05-2019, 11:49 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,111
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
I have two both at 3 5/16” bore but one has 4” crank and the other 4 1/4” crank ,4”one with electric fan and the other 4 1/4” crank a mechanical fan . Stuck in stop go traffic crawling in summer for half an hour in both cars ,cool as a cucumber , the only frustration was the traffic jam, and on the clutch all the time.
Both blocks were super cleaned and lots of original core sand flushed out, 180 stats , 7Lb caps. 4 1/4” has drake pumps ,4” has Skip Haney pumps. All surfaces decked and square, ignition set right , 97s jetted right. Gotta say the 4 1/4” in a light 32 3W has some torque though it doesnt really rev up quickly. Overheating is not an issue with proper preparation. Last edited by my4dv8; 03-06-2019 at 06:33 PM. |
03-06-2019, 06:25 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,304
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
I've had two 3 5/16" bore 8BA engines. The first was a 4" stroke that had no problems. The second is my current stock stroke 258" engine. This one tested OK (the machinist said it would go to 3 3/8"). When he bored it out, one cylinder had a pit in it that he said was a casting flaw. He said we could run it the way it was, but I decided to play it safe and had him sleeve that one cylinder. The engine runs well and has no overheating problems.
I guess what you can do will be best determined by the relative costs of sleeves, piston sets, and machining. |
03-06-2019, 09:25 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 3,799
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Why are you averse to doing a sonic test? Is there nobody in your area that can do it? NONE of my blocks have been bored without doing that first. You also can see if there is any core shift as the thickness on one side of all the cylinders on one or both banks are thicker on one side then the other. It won't show you if there are deep rust pits in the water jacket side unless you happen to test in just that spot. My engine machinist doesn't bore a block to wall thickness less then .100. This is why you don't buy the pistons before you check how much you can bore it.
|
03-06-2019, 10:02 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,857
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Have the engine "BAKED" cleaned to prevent overheating.
|
03-06-2019, 10:13 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: ohio
Posts: 986
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
I'd keep it simple, sleeve the block & use the pistons you have. Maybe mill the heads to increase compression. Just my .02 cents. Good luck & have fun with it! mike
|
03-06-2019, 10:31 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Bonita, CA
Posts: 1,374
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Magnaflux then go for it or scrap if badly cracked. 8BAs are not that hard to come by. Many people have a bunch on the shelf including me. The pre- 59A blocks are another story.
|
03-06-2019, 11:01 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,526
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
Must pressure test also. Most important.
|
03-06-2019, 12:22 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 10,925
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
The ambient temperature where you live has a lot to do with overheating.
|
03-06-2019, 12:36 PM | #18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
As Tinker said, what I have is rust pitting that the .060 bore didn't fix.
I wanted to have the block sonic tested, but no place around here will do it. No machine shop would even magnaflux it. Best I could do was a pressure test (which showed no cracks). So, I thought I'd ask the ones who know and have experience with this engines to know if it would be safe to do a .100 overbore without sonic testing. There aren't so many god blocks left here in Brazil. I bought two to find a good one, and most blocks I've seen were cracked or rusted beyond salvation. And the worst part is that even in bad condition they are quite expensive. As flatheadmurre pointed out, if this engine ran a long time with pure water (which was a common practice here in Brazil) would that indicate that the safest approach would be to sleeve the block? Seams that without the sonic test the safest choice would be to sleeve the block and have just a mild .060 bore. |
03-06-2019, 02:01 PM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brazil
Posts: 12
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
One more question: if the machining process hit a thin point and exposes the water jackets, can a sleeve save the block or it will be ruined?
I've heard that some diesel engines use wet sleeves, could that be a solution in that case? |
03-06-2019, 03:12 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,407
|
Re: .100 or .125 bore without sonic testing the block? How Safe?
I would spend about $60 US and get a sonic test gauge from Ebay and test it myself.
Ebay number : 31204599171 is an example. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|