|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-03-2018, 07:14 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
302 Ford engine
My friend has a 1991 Ford in his car has a carb on it trying to find a camshaft for it he wants to go roller but no one can tell us for sure what cam will work for his block cause in 1989 to 1999 they use the same blocks we were told but in 1993 they had roller lifters most of the block were set up for roller lifters
So can we fit a retro fit cam in it cause it is the one he only can find that he likes Couple pictures of the blocks one a roller block one a none roller one First one is the roller one |
07-03-2018, 08:56 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent, WA. Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,414
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
I’d get the numbers and date code off it and call the cam grinder. They should know. I know for some applications they make roller lifters to retrofit pre roller blocks.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
07-03-2018, 09:09 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
The trouble is the block will take both but can't find the cam he wants in the stock roller cam just in the retro one we going to call comp cam on Thursday and find out
|
07-03-2018, 09:56 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Now on the Land of Sun City West, AZ
Posts: 409
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
I'd appreciate it if you could tell me where the block numbers are. I have. Perhaps, a 94 302.. I've tried a bit to find them but not good enough.
|
07-03-2018, 11:43 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
OK above the starter on the block
|
07-03-2018, 11:52 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
07-04-2018, 04:28 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,552
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Quote:
The Casting ID will be found @ the starter... The Engine Assembly Date ID will (may) be found as the photo shows... The Partial VIN Stamp (1968- ) will be found per photo... The 302/5.0L has a long service history (1968-2001) so there are many differences to be aware of.
__________________
*****
- AT MY AGE, ONE APPRECIATES A STURDY HANDRAIL - Last edited by KULTULZ; 07-04-2018 at 04:49 AM. |
|
07-04-2018, 04:30 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,552
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Quote:
See the two drilled bosses in the lifter valley for the tappet spider?
__________________
*****
- AT MY AGE, ONE APPRECIATES A STURDY HANDRAIL - Last edited by KULTULZ; 07-04-2018 at 11:07 AM. Reason: TO HOPEFULLY CLARIFY INFORMATION |
|
07-04-2018, 09:32 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Yes I know there is a difference between the two but no one can tell me if the aftermarket camshaft will fit in the roller block they all say up to 1985
|
07-04-2018, 10:01 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 528
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Dumb question. Why would it not fit? Different cam bearing? Different lifter bores?
|
07-04-2018, 10:16 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
On the roller block they are not as tall for one thing
And on sbc the cam bearing journal are not the same I don't no about i ask summit and jegs and they could not answer my question for me they didn't know for sure |
07-04-2018, 11:04 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,552
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Quote:
An aftermarket cam will fit either, you just have to order the correct cam for the particular block you have. Am I close? ADDITIONAL COMMENT- 1985/1986 were the first years of the 5.0L roller specific blocks. Not all 5.0L went to roller right away although they may have used the updated block. CLICK HERE- http://www.compcams.com/Pages/419/ca...aspx#HydRoller
__________________
*****
- AT MY AGE, ONE APPRECIATES A STURDY HANDRAIL - Last edited by KULTULZ; 07-04-2018 at 11:21 AM. Reason: TRYING TO CLARIFY |
|
07-04-2018, 11:37 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
You are right the 1985 302 Ho has roller cam
The question that I'm trying to find out is will a roller retro fit cam fit in a roller block or not Last edited by 1931flathead; 07-04-2018 at 11:51 AM. |
07-04-2018, 11:55 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,552
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Quote:
Now remember, the 5.0L roller block had differing machining/protocols as determined by final designated engine assembly (roller engine vs non-roller engine). Maybe to help illustrate, there was a STD, HO and LT (light truck) 5.0L engine. You have to cover your butt there. A roller block casting may come from machining with the spider hold-downs either roughly cast and/or not drilled/threaded. There were several design progressions. Now there is a FORD OEM roller camshaft (and valve-train) and an aftermarket 302/5.0L retrofit cam kit. Now can I confuse or what ... ...
__________________
*****
- AT MY AGE, ONE APPRECIATES A STURDY HANDRAIL - |
|
07-04-2018, 12:01 PM | #15 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IN A 'GALAXIE' FAR FAR AWAY
Posts: 6,552
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
Quote:
Quote:
I am having trouble understanding you use of the word retro-fit. That term can be used with either OEM or aftermarket cam ... ...
__________________
*****
- AT MY AGE, ONE APPRECIATES A STURDY HANDRAIL - |
||
07-04-2018, 12:13 PM | #16 |
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Utica, Ohio
Posts: 522
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
The retrofit cam has a smaller base circle so the lifters can ride lower. The OEM cam has a larger base circle and the roller blocks have taller lifter bores. If you put a OEM roller cam in a non roller block the lifters will ride too high and dump oil pressure.
|
07-04-2018, 12:22 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
OK 1988 to 1991 had the boss for roller cams but came with a flat tappet cam my 1993 has a roller cam and i was told they are the same blocks
|
07-04-2018, 01:14 PM | #18 |
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Utica, Ohio
Posts: 522
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
If the block has the bosses for the hold down spider then it is a roller block. You can run a flat tappet cam in a roller block.
|
07-04-2018, 01:44 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: central minn
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
So why can't I run a retro fit cam in then if I can run a flat tappet one I should beable to run a retro one then
|
07-04-2018, 01:56 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Inland Empire of Washington State
Posts: 368
|
Re: 302 Ford engine
You can't run rollers unless you can keep them from spinning in the lifter bores. The 2 bosses in the roller block are for attaching a tin "spider" device that keeps the lifter aligned, no spinning. The old block has no way to do this. You could run a retro fit roller set up if you can find a set of roller lifters with a connecting link bar between 2 lifters, that keeps the lifters from spinning. These were around on the aftermarket before Ford built their roller system. But, for the cost, just find another block, the junk yards are full of them at a much cheaper price than messing around with a retro deal.
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|