Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2020, 01:15 AM   #1
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Question Stock versus Performance Cams

I'm rebuilding a C8BA. Will be bored around .030" over, had a Merc crank installed at one time, have three 97s on a Fenton Intake, original Eddie Meyer heads, Zephyr gears in a forties truck tranny I'm hoping can be fitted to a'32 tranny mount, and a '40 car rearend with undetermined gears at this time.

So I'm thinking a Shadbolt M60 cam, kind of like the Isky Max1, or staying stock. Any comments between the two cams? Good or bad... I'll most likely use adjustable lifters but will I need different valvesprings if I have my cam reground.

I've done research and all I got was Perplexed!
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 01:23 AM   #2
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Do a regrind or another cam. Not stock lift. In my opinion. Street or race? 3 pot will need some air flow.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-13-2020, 02:39 AM   #3
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,260
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I've got a MAX-1 in one engine (258 ci) and an 1CM in another (255 ci). Quite frankly, I can't tell the difference most of the time. They both idle nice and smooth. The MAX-1 seems to want to rev higher.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 04:55 AM   #4
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Matching heads to pistons will do more to performance in a normal car then a big cam.
What is the weight of the car ?
3 carbs is a lot for a stock setup...and usually more of a headache to maintain then itīs worth...
Big 97 center and blocking off the others comes to mind for a stock setup...and looks..
The mercury or EAB cam ainīt a bad choice for a fullsize car...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:35 AM   #5
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

The car is a '32 5W. I have been debating just using the centre carb and blocking off the other two. More to think about...
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:37 AM   #6
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
What about valve springs, if I went with the Shadbolt 60/ Max1 would different than stock springs be required?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:43 AM   #7
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,842
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

If you had a copy of JWL's book, you'd have the answer. Any cam with longer duration will kill of low end torque. Raising compression will increase torque through the entire RPM range. The engine you have is almost exactly like the one in his book. Getting his book could save you money.
Ol' Ron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:09 AM   #8
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,260
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunateson View Post
What about valve springs, if I went with the Shadbolt 60/ Max1 would different than stock springs be required?
A set of Isky 185-G springs (the same ones they supply with their MAX-1 cam and kit) are just a smidge over $100. It would be false economy not to purchase a set.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:56 AM   #9
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

What is your target rpm...what is valvetrain weight...how agressive is the cam...that will ad up to what springs you going to need.
Most people try and ad a LOT more springpressure to the mix then they actually need...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 11:02 AM   #10
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,260
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

"Murre" - You're right, but what's the fun in telling someone at a car show : "Yep, and then I installed a new set of stock valve springs."? "185-G" sounds technically impressive.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 11:23 AM   #11
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,516
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I would use the Lincoln Zephyr springs rather than the 185-G springs.
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:00 PM   #12
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,022
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

For what it is worth, Gary (GOSFAST) over on the HAMB said that the Isky 185-G spring has a seat pressure of 80# at installed height of 2.000". I read somewhere that the Zephyr spring is 70#.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:29 PM   #13
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,260
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I don't see much difference in the seat pressure, but there seems to be a big difference in price. I see Michael has them for $39.95; that sure beats $108.95 for a set of 185-G's from Summit. I do see however, that the Zephyr springs say they are "stock spring pressure". Maybe Iskenderian thinks the MAX-1 needs stiffer springs?
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:58 PM   #14
flatheadmurre
Senior Member
 
flatheadmurre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Zephyr springs isnīt that much tougher then the stock springs...i can measure a couple but if i remember right in the 60lbs neighbourhood...
Then there`s a lot of different things sold as "Zephyr" springs out there...
Stock 40lbs-Zephyr 60lbs-185G 85lbs...coarse estimate without any warranty...
flatheadmurre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 02:07 PM   #15
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,842
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I use stock springs with a .060" shims on all my street engines even with the L-100. I used athe short springs with rotators on the Maz #1 to improve the valve seat life. However I do use the Isky springs on the 400 jr All you need on the seat is 50lbs for most street cams, and a .060" spacer/shim is allot cheaper and works just fine

Now if you plan on turning 6500 at Bville, that's another story
Ol' Ron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 03:58 PM   #16
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,369
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Yup, heavier seat pressure won't allow float at higher rpm but it depends on what a person wants to do with it. For high torque, the closer to stock stuff is better.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 05:29 PM   #17
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,516
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I'm like Ron. Shim stock springs or go with the Zephyr springs. 185 G's are pretty much unnecessary unless you have a really wild cam. How many street engines are ever revved to even 5000 rpm?
flatjack9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 06:01 PM   #18
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,374
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

"Now if you plan on turning 6500 at Bville, that's another story".

6500 won't even get you in the show nowadays. LOL
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 06:09 PM   #19
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

I do have Frank Oddo's book...
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 06:10 PM   #20
Fortunateson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: Stock versus Performance Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by flatjack9 View Post
I'm like Ron. Shim stock springs or go with the Zephyr springs. 185 G's are pretty much unnecessary unless you have a really wild cam. How many street engines are ever revved to even 5000 rpm?
So what you are saying is as long as the original springs are in good shape use them, close I could get away with shims?
Fortunateson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.