|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-01-2013, 05:57 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: onalaska , wisconsin
Posts: 535
|
pertronix question
Can I just eliminate my external resistor when installing the pertronix eliminator? I have a 67 Ford with stock 302 and original distributor. I would run the pertronix wires to either side of the coil and run the ignition wire to the pos side of coil, rather than through the old external resisitor.
|
02-01-2013, 06:21 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 815
|
Re: pertronix question
I don't think so, the one that went into my 62 Bird still had the resistor in the circuit.....been a while so I'm not 00% sure....
__________________
Bill, certified Ford nut. 2016 F-150 2016 Focus 08 Shelby GT500 57 Ford Ranchero 36 Chevy, 351C/FMX, 8", Mustang II |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
02-01-2013, 07:51 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: onalaska , wisconsin
Posts: 535
|
Re: pertronix question
The reason I am asking is that I thought the main reason for the external resistor was the reduction of voltage to the points system. So if we are eliminating the points with the Pertronics set up , then why run the ignition voltage through that resister???
Can't seem to get anybody at Pertronics to reply to my question, so I thought there might be some experienced Ford guys that might have the answer. Anybody else have a comment? |
02-01-2013, 08:24 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
|
Re: pertronix question
Run the resistor. Saves the current flow through the PERTRONIXS for a longer life
|
02-01-2013, 08:47 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: onalaska , wisconsin
Posts: 535
|
Re: pertronix question
Bubba.....ok I will take your advise. Now, can I just run the pertronix wire to the + side of the coil or do I need to run it to the ignition switch side of the external resistor. Reason I ask , is the terminal on this pertronix lead wire is a loop end and would fasten to the coil stud easily. The resistor terminal is a single male spade so I would have to fashion a dual attachment to run the petronix wire and the ignition switch wire to it.
|
02-02-2013, 09:31 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Greenwood SC
Posts: 294
|
Re: pertronix question
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
02-02-2013, 11:34 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SPEEDWAY INDIANA
Posts: 4,148
|
Re: pertronix question
Quote:
|
|
02-02-2013, 11:54 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenmoore Pa
Posts: 1,644
|
Re: pertronix question
I believe the instructions from petronix state to hook both wires directly to the coil. I've done a handful and that's what I recall at least.
|
02-02-2013, 12:09 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 11
|
Re: pertronix question
The instructions I used indicated you could eliminate the resistor when using the petronix coil, everything is working fine on my setup!
|
02-02-2013, 12:45 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Glenmoore Pa
Posts: 1,644
|
Re: pertronix question
As per what dan said I've never used a resistor either.
|
02-02-2013, 07:01 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Willetton, West Australia
Posts: 478
|
Re: pertronix question
This topic has had a life of its own on the yblocks forever forum. You won't cause any issue using it with a resistor but if you remove it and don't use the correct coil you will destroy the pertronix unit. The early units don't tolerate the ignition left on either. The later units this has been addressed.
You say your coil has a spade lug but every one I have seen, the spade lug is held on with a nut to the coil. I personally prefer a coil with nuts as spade lugs become loose and then get hot. Just my two cents worth. Regards
__________________
Rick West Australia 1958 Ford Mainline Utility, 1955 Ford Tudor Sedan Quote:
|
|
02-02-2013, 07:40 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: onalaska , wisconsin
Posts: 535
|
Re: pertronix question
Rick.......My external resistor has the spade terminal, not the coil.
Steve |
02-02-2013, 09:11 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Willetton, West Australia
Posts: 478
|
Re: pertronix question
Sorry about that Steve, most resistors have spade lugs. Connect your Pertronix across the coil if you are using a resistor. If you are not using the correct coil it is cheap insurance.
Regards
__________________
Rick West Australia 1958 Ford Mainline Utility, 1955 Ford Tudor Sedan Quote:
|
|
02-03-2013, 04:47 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: onalaska , wisconsin
Posts: 535
|
Re: pertronix question
I did hear back from the Pertronix Tech hot line this morning and they confirmed that you can eliminate the external resistor and go directly to the coil with the ignitor leads as long you have a coil with 1.5 Ohms resistance between the two terminals. So I will check that out first and go from there. THANKS A LOT TO ALL THAT RESPONDED!
|
02-03-2013, 05:37 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,849
|
Re: pertronix question
Quote:
Now back to using points as my trigger, but thats another story. Back to the question... The Ignitor instructions basically states that if your ignition originally had a ballast resistor, use it. If not, don't add one. It also mentions the bit about 1.5 ohms across the coil and if not 1.5 ohms add a 1.5 ohm ballast resistor. Kind of confusing... It goes on to say you can also purchase their Flame Thrower coil that has a internal resistance of 1.5 ohms. You don't state which model Pertronix you are using. here is a link to the Ignitor Instructions that I used. Ignitor Instructions Last edited by Y-Blockhead; 02-03-2013 at 05:53 PM. |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|