Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2017, 09:16 AM   #1
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default 39 Head torque

Edmund (sp?) finned aluminum, 40? 45 ? "Best" brand gasket. Copper coat ?
__________________
Live in the Past.... It's cheaper.

Last edited by SuperDave; 04-06-2017 at 07:40 AM.
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 01:07 PM   #2
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: 39 Head torque

45 lb, Best gaskets are fine. No copper coat.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-05-2017, 03:02 PM   #3
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,855
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Yes, #45 is more than enough. However, you should do this through at least 3 heat cycles. THis will insure compressing the gasket. Now if these are new heads they should be checked for piston clearance. Looking foe .045/050" for best preformance and economy.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 08:28 PM   #4
WestCoast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: oroville calif
Posts: 893
Default Re: 39 Head torque

motors manual says 35 to 40# for aluminum, I don't like copper gaskets with aluminum heads, worry about electrolisis, it my never happen but I play it safe
WestCoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 02:02 PM   #5
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 39 Head torque

I just noticed that there are two different head gaskets for this engine. one type has round water passage holes in the center, the other has trapezoidal holes.. Does it make a difference?
__________________
Live in the Past.... It's cheaper.
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 02:22 PM   #6
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,988
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
I just noticed that there are two different head gaskets for this engine. one type has round water passage holes in the center, the other has trapezoidal holes.. Does it make a difference?
I'd suggest you match the gasket to the engine (hole). The trapezoid hole is Ford, the round hole is Merc.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 02:50 PM   #7
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Kube ? I wasn't aware of a Ford vs Mercury block, an additional detail?
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 06:29 PM   #8
Kube
Senior Member
 
Kube's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 8,988
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSeery View Post
Kube ? I wasn't aware of a Ford vs Mercury block, an additional detail?
At least in '39 - '40, the center water passage was different between the Ford and Mercury castings. Ford had a trapezoid shaped passage while Mercury had a round passage.
__________________
"I can explain it for you. However, I can't understand it for you".
Kube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 09:55 PM   #9
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kube View Post
At least in '39 - '40, the center water passage was different between the Ford and Mercury castings. Ford had a trapezoid shaped passage while Mercury had a round passage.
Thanks, didn't know that! But then there's lots I don't know!!!
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2017, 08:23 AM   #10
john in illinois
Senior Member
 
john in illinois's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,183
Default Re: 39 Head torque

This is from Best for copper or graphtite gaskets.

Install using using a spray-on sealant like K & W Copper Coat or Permatex Copper Spray-A-Gasket. Always re-torque, no short-cuts.

John
john in illinois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 04:50 PM   #11
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: 39 Head torque

What holes are in the head? I have always used the gasket with round holes. I believe Ford went to these as a service gasket.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 05:19 PM   #12
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 39 Head torque

The head is in the machine shop, so I can't match it up to the gasket yet. The gasket that matches the block has the trapezoidal water holes in the center and has larger water holes in the lower section. I'll take some pictures when I have all the parts here.
__________________
Live in the Past.... It's cheaper.
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2017, 05:58 PM   #13
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,420
Default Re: 39 Head torque

A friend of mine always put a good coat of silver aluminum pigment spray paint on copper gaskets instead of copper coat. His explanation way back then was that it wouldn't corrode as easy. Knowing what I know now about dissimilar metal corrosion, it makes even more sense to me now. The aluminum pigment paint would block the copper from the aluminum head better as well as provide a bit of sealing.

Best gaskets are pretty good stuff but sometimes you have to play with the gasket thickness and copper is the only way to really do that. It just depends on how you build the engine.

Ford played around a fair bit with the deck ports. 221 24-stud would have trapezoidal center ports. 239 engines were round in the center. A lot of gaskets choke down on some of the ports to slow the flow in certain areas. They just have small holes in the gasket while the deck ports will be larger.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2017, 10:45 AM   #14
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 39 Head torque

If I did it right, there should be two head gaskets pictured.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg head gaskets.JPG (153.9 KB, 49 views)
__________________
Live in the Past.... It's cheaper.
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2017, 10:48 AM   #15
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 39 Head torque

It worked ! The top one is the one I removed. The bottom one is the new one I am going to install. The top one not only restricts water flow in the center, but also has smaller water holes on the bottom between 1&2 and 3&4. This is a much better match to the block. Machine shop is dragging it's feet.
__________________
Live in the Past.... It's cheaper.
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2017, 12:47 PM   #16
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,420
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Ford actually restricted some of the ports for a reason. This way they could control the flow around the cylinders and especially through the head a bit better to relieve hot spots. The 8BA blocks had larger ports at the back of the decks to flow more from rear to front but it made the decks a bit weaker. I don't get real worried about the gaskets changing the coolant flow.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2017, 05:35 PM   #17
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: 39 Head torque

The upper gasket directs more flow to rear cylinders and is a much better gasket than the lower one. The upper still allows plenty of flow at the middle.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 04:28 PM   #18
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Bad news... Got the head back from the 'shene shop.. They cut it .012. I didn't like what I saw. The head was bowed with the center raised. Making the end chambers slightly smaller.Couldn't find my magnetic mount for my dial indicator. (probably loaned out!).I should have stopped but being an optimist... I put the head on without a head gasket. Cranked engine over by hand and nothing touched (that I could feel). Checked the thickness of the gasket I took off, "Best". Found the compressed gasket measured .058". I figured there should be enough clearance if the new "Best" gasket compresses the same. I would bet that the deck was cut at some time since it is a .040 over bore. It certainly had a major rebuild along the way.. Every thing was great up to the third torqueing after two runs and cooling. Third torqueing went OK but when I started it up.. knocking! Removed the head and found the front and back exhaust valve just barely touching the head. So Now it looks like we are looking for new heads. If it was my car I would opt for stock iron and dress it up with chrome nut covers but the owner likes the Bling of the finned heads. I keep telling myself that this is a fun hobby.. It sure as heck isn't a profitable one! Anyone have a set of uncut finned heads?
__________________
Live in the Past.... It's cheaper.
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 08:40 PM   #19
flatjack9
Senior Member
 
flatjack9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 4,525
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
Bad news... Got the head back from the 'shene shop.. They cut it .012. I didn't like what I saw. The head was bowed with the center raised. Making the end chambers slightly smaller.Couldn't find my magnetic mount for my dial indicator. (probably loaned out!).I should have stopped but being an optimist... I put the head on without a head gasket. Cranked engine over by hand and nothing touched (that I could feel). Checked the thickness of the gasket I took off, "Best". Found the compressed gasket measured .058". I figured there should be enough clearance if the new "Best" gasket compresses the same. I would bet that the deck was cut at some time since it is a .040 over bore. It certainly had a major rebuild along the way.. Every thing was great up to the third torqueing after two runs and cooling. Third torqueing went OK but when I started it up.. knocking! Removed the head and found the front and back exhaust valve just barely touching the head. So Now it looks like we are looking for new heads. If it was my car I would opt for stock iron and dress it up with chrome nut covers but the owner likes the Bling of the finned heads. I keep telling myself that this is a fun hobby.. It sure as heck isn't a profitable one! Anyone have a set of uncut finned heads?
Obviously they had to be touching when you tried it without a gasket! A little grinding and you will be just fine. I would use the aluminum foils balls to check clearance before you finish the job. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
flatjack9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 04:47 PM   #20
JSeery
Member Emeritus
 
JSeery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 16,132
Default Re: 39 Head torque

Why not just clearance for the valves? Not that difficult.
JSeery is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.