Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2023, 09:38 AM   #1
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

It is fairly simple to determine that increasing the compression ratio on the little Ford 4 cylinder A engine will make the car more drive able due to the additional power it will develop. But by how much? What are the comparisons to be made between the two aftermarket iron heads offered?

The low range torque curve for the 6.0:1 head was a little flatter than the 5.5:1 head, power output was negligible for the two, about 3.5 HP. For an engine with insert bearings and given that the cost for the two heads is the same, the 6.0:1 head would probably be the way to go.....But what of the exhaust note between the stock and higher compression heads? Are they the same?

I know that the 10.5-11.0:1 V8s from the 60s had quite distinguishable exhaust sounds over their low compression 8.75:1 counterparts. But ignition, valve timing (camshafts), carberaturion/induction, and exhaust was also different for these old fire breathing dragons.

I guess I want it to sound like a Model A, those who are using these heads, which one is it, and what does it sound like??
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 09:53 AM   #2
alexiskai
Senior Member
 
alexiskai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mebane NC
Posts: 2,356
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Use the 6.5:1 Burtz head. Better cooling, more power, correct size, similar price. End of story.
alexiskai is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-02-2023, 10:22 AM   #3
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexiskai View Post
Use the 6.5:1 Burtz head. Better cooling, more power, correct size, similar price. End of story.

Are you using one of these heads? If so, are there any differences in the sound of the running engine?
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 10:33 AM   #4
BRENT in 10-uh-C
Senior Member
 
BRENT in 10-uh-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,520
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

FWIW, an original muffler and exhaust system has different tone than what an aftermarket Aries muffler has. Yes, compression ratio affects the idle quality but is less detectable at higher RPMs. The increased compression just 'hits harder' for each stroke at idle over a stock 4¼:1 ratio. The caveat is most hobbyists today have no clue what they originally sounded like.
__________________
.

BRENT in 10-uh-C
.
www.model-a-ford.com
...(...Finally Updated!! )

.
BRENT in 10-uh-C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 10:43 AM   #5
Bob Bidonde
Senior Member
 
Bob Bidonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,472
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

I have a 6:1 head on my Victoria and it sounds like a Model A at idle.
__________________
Bob Bidonde
Bob Bidonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:02 AM   #6
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Bidonde View Post
I have a 6:1 head on my Victoria and it sounds like a Model A at idle.

Thanks bob, that is what I was wanting to know. The Model A has a very distinctive "cackle" and I would not want to affect that. The 3.54:1 ring and pinion I recently installed is requiring a little more "twist" than is currently available prompting these considerations.

I would imagine that you are realizing better fuel millage to boot. The last tank with the new final drive changes yielded 14.6 MPG.....I think we can do better...
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:02 AM   #7
nkaminar
Senior Member
 
nkaminar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,900
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

There is more than compression ratio to flathead head design. The air must turn to flow down the cylinder during the intake stroke and out during the exhaust stroke. The design of the squish area determines how well and how fast the combustion takes place. In my opinion, the best head designs are those for flathead Harlies and racing Briggs and Stratton engines.
__________________
A is for apple, green as the sky.
Step on the gas, for tomorrow I die.
Forget the brakes, they really don't work.
The clutch always sticks, and starts with a jerk.
My car grows red hair, and flies through the air.
Driving's a blast, a blast from the past.
nkaminar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:03 AM   #8
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRENT in 10-uh-C View Post
FWIW, an original muffler and exhaust system has different tone than what an aftermarket Aries muffler has. Yes, compression ratio affects the idle quality but is less detectable at higher RPMs. The increased compression just 'hits harder' for each stroke at idle over a stock 4¼:1 ratio. The caveat is most hobbyists today have no clue what they originally sounded like.

Yes, I would expect so Terry....I might fool them, but I remember what they sounded like....Thanks
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:03 AM   #9
AzBob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 130
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Bidonde View Post
I have a 6:1 head on my Victoria and it sounds like a Model A at idle.

X2.
6:1 Snyders head on mine and sounds like Model A at idle as well.
AzBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:08 AM   #10
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzBob View Post
X2.
6:1 Snyders head on mine and sounds like Model A at idle as well.
This is the head I am seriously considering. You both indicate that it sounds like a Model A at idle peaking my curiosity, does it sound noticeably different at other throttle positions?
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:29 AM   #11
AzBob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 130
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8EL View Post
This is the head I am seriously considering. You both indicate that it sounds like a Model A at idle peaking my curiosity, does it sound noticeably different at other throttle positions?

FWIW, other than "sounds like a Model A at idle", I am going to disqualify myself for the "does it sound noticeably differently at other throttle positions?"

I have a Weber carb and cast iron exhaust header with Aries plain steel muffler. Other than idle sounding the same (to my ears) as an original 4.2:1 setup, it seems to sound the same under lower rpm load with the characteristic "cackle." At cruising speeds, IMHO, seems to have an overall smoother sound. This is of course subjective as I have never heard my Model A drive by.

Last edited by AzBob; 12-02-2023 at 10:51 PM.
AzBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 11:48 AM   #12
GeneBob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Denver Area
Posts: 433
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

I went with the Snyder's 6:1 a few years ago and liked it. It is a good head. I have since gone with a Lion III head and I think it is smoother than the Snyder was.
If I were starting from scratch now, I think the Burtz may be the way to go. Higher compression and better water passages would be the deciding factors.
We have come a VERY LONG WAY from the 1930's gasoline and engine rebuilds. Take full advantage and improve the efficiency of your engine.
GeneBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 01:35 PM   #13
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

I have the Snyder 5.5 head with a cast iron header and Aires muffler (not stainless) and it sounds like a Model A.
__________________
Alaskan A's
Antique Auto Mushers of Alaska
Model A Ford Club of America
Model A Restorers Club
Antique Automobile Club of America
Mullins Owner's Club
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 01:52 PM   #14
Gene F
Senior Member
 
Gene F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,973
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8EL View Post
Thanks bob, that is what I was wanting to know. The Model A has a very distinctive "cackle" and I would not want to affect that. The 3.54:1 ring and pinion I recently installed is requiring a little more "twist" than is currently available prompting these considerations.

I would imagine that you are realizing better fuel millage to boot. The last tank with the new final drive changes yielded 14.6 MPG.....I think we can do better...
Stock exhaust pipe, and the big heavy flywheel will retain that "lope" when you idle her down. JMHO The higher compression heads run cooler - go figure... However, the car doesn't really have as much appeal if you do not drive it. Nothing like going to the hardware store, post office, or any other errand, and having someone ask about your car, or say "nice car".
Gene F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 06:47 PM   #15
ndnchf
Senior Member
 
ndnchf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Posts: 764
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Snyders 6.1 on mine and it too sounds like a model A should at idle.
ndnchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 07:44 PM   #16
Big hammer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

I have a Synders 6.0 -1 head, 330 touring cam, larger intake valve’s, and Aries plain steel muffler. All of the old timers comment your A is so quiet, I’am not old enough to know if it sounds like stock, Aries says there made to Ford specs , retard the timing lever and it will cackle ! and adjust the idle at a slow idle.
__________________
Don't force it with a little hammer tap, tap, tap
get a bigger hammer tap done
Big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2023, 10:29 PM   #17
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

All very useful information, thanks fellas.....
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2023, 11:14 AM   #18
nkaminar
Senior Member
 
nkaminar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,900
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

My current Model A does not sound like the Model A's of my youth. But nothing does because of my bad hearing.
__________________
A is for apple, green as the sky.
Step on the gas, for tomorrow I die.
Forget the brakes, they really don't work.
The clutch always sticks, and starts with a jerk.
My car grows red hair, and flies through the air.
Driving's a blast, a blast from the past.
nkaminar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2023, 11:38 AM   #19
8EL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 235
Default Re: 5.5:1 vs 6.0:1 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by nkaminar View Post
My current Model A does not sound like the Model A's of my youth. But nothing does because of my bad hearing.
Heard that....no pun intended??

My wife says I have selective hearing, in her case I always have, it's just now I can realistically use the excuse.....
8EL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.