|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-24-2018, 02:33 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Indian River, Michigan
Posts: 59
|
Ford vs Mercury transmission
I have a 1937 Ford toploader transmission (no synchro) and have an opportunity to pick up a 1939 Mercury toploader tranmission (supposedly with synchro).
Are these transmissions the same (to facilitate a swap) other than the internal synchro gears in the later model Merc? Were all 1939 Merc transmissions equipped with the synchro or were some early ones the same (no synchro) as the older (pre 1939) Ford transmissions? Any help/advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. |
04-24-2018, 02:48 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,260
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
They all have synchronizers starting in 32. That only applies to second & high , low is not. However, the 39 is more desirable and it will bolt right in.
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
04-24-2018, 02:53 PM | #3 |
BANNED
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,019
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
'32 thru early '39 trans had a syncro hub with the tapered syncro 'brake' surface integral
with the hub. Along about Nov or Dec of '38 Ford introduced the much improved loose ring syncro design where the hub now only trapped the syncros, this design about doubled the syncro 'braking' surface. The '37 Ford and '39 Merc trans are interchangeble, except maybe the rear mount....not sure. Anyhoo except for some monster truck applications '32 up had syncromesh, just much improved for '39. Charlie ny |
04-24-2018, 02:57 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,748
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
Synchro trans came out in 1932.
Bob |
04-24-2018, 09:18 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
Did a 39 merc use a 78 case or did they have their own 99A case ?
|
04-24-2018, 10:55 PM | #6 |
MEMBER EMERITUS
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,380
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
78C 7005 S |
04-24-2018, 10:56 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McMinnville, TN
Posts: 2,327
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
They used a 78 case but many Mercury’s had the 29 tooth cluster. Ford put a yellow paint mark on the LH Side of the transmission case on Mercury’s with the 29 tooth cluster
|
04-25-2018, 07:24 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Indian River, Michigan
Posts: 59
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
Thanks all. Looks like it may be a worthwhile investment then.
|
04-25-2018, 02:20 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
Early 1939 Mercury cars had a 99A case but they are somewhat rare. Someone started a thread about this some years ago and there were photos of the number on the case but it looked identical to the ones used in the Ford cars on the outside. The inside had the 29/15 related gears.
|
04-25-2018, 02:55 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 151
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
One of my '39 style transmissions in the shop
is stamped: *99A 69525* |
04-25-2018, 05:34 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,735
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
|
04-25-2018, 06:01 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,426
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
The 99A transmission case has a casting number to that respect. Not stamped. The transmissions of the prewar and immediate post war era all had the serial numbers stamped on above the inspection port unless they were replacements. I think they had a brain fart when they found that the two cases were basically the same so after a short time they were all using the same case.
|
04-25-2018, 06:37 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 151
|
Re: Ford vs Mercury transmission
Skidmarks, sorry to cause confusion. The numbers I posted
are Stamped above the inspection port. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|