Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2015, 05:01 PM   #1
spdway1
Senior Member
 
spdway1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicopee, MA
Posts: 1,400
Default Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

Does anyone run a Michell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 (high speed)Ring and Pinion?

What is the outcome and is worth the money?

Thank you.
[email protected]
spdway1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 05:49 PM   #2
Patrick L.
Senior Member
 
Patrick L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 7,225
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

The Mitchell transmitter is said to be a good unit like their other products. This transmission still is direct in high gear as other transmissions,but is available in a couple different 1st and 2nd gear ratios. [ I think thats a good thing]
The 3:54 rear gear will give about 4-5 mph more cruise speed at the same engine speed.
Patrick L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 07-17-2015, 03:49 AM   #3
waxhead
Senior Member
 
waxhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: West Australia
Posts: 346
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I have both and like it. The synchro gear box is easier to drive and as stated above, the 3.54 ring and pinion gives an increase of 5mph (or thereabouts) at the same revs.

Is it worth the money?? Depends on what you want. Some people are of the opinion that the synchros detract from the "A" driving experience. Each to their own.
waxhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:28 AM   #4
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,488
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

In one of my cars, I run the Mitchell Synchro transmission and overdrive (26%) with the standard diff ratio and I love it for touring or around town. Unless your motor is a dog, you will pull the 3.54 ratio easily enough and if it is any good at all, you'd handle the O/D as well.
I'm about to put 16" wheels on another car so I'll use a 3.54 diff in it to compensate for the smaller wheels. I will probably be unable to resist trying the original wheels with that setupp before I put the 16" ones on.
In short, I don;t think you'll be disappointed with the change till you put an O/D in as well.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood.
Synchro909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 11:27 AM   #5
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,081
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I would recommend a 4.11 or 3.78 at the highest with any O.D. With anything higher you will be lugging the engine witch will cause damage to it, plus your top speed will actually be lower!
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 01:15 PM   #6
Benson
Senior Member
 
Benson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,591
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I have had 3.54's for 25 years, recently added the 15%/15% Mitchell synchro transmission.

I agree with Jim B on 4.11 / 3.78 with OD. I finally put 6.00 16s on the Coupe to lower the rear gear ratio.

Even with the smaller tires it is still too tall a gear especially on long uphill mountain roads with lots of switchbacks.


This problem gets much worse when you go 10,000 to 12,000 feet; this is when you really needed the RPMs to make up for the lack of air.

As for the Mitchel transmission ... definitely get the 15/15 model.

The higher 1st and 2nd is a delight to drive especially around town ... I love it!

I drove the Coupe for 40,000 miles on the same mountain roads from 1962 to 1966 with a 4.11 rear-end. It was a vastly different car compared to the 3.54s.


Still have not decided on 4.11 or 3.78 yet.

Additional info added 03-22-2016


I got the 26% OD and changed rear from 3.54 to 3.78.

The lower 3.78 gears are so much better than the 3.54s.

Much better combination and OD slows down RPMs and noise is lower above 55 MPH.

Last edited by Benson; 03-22-2016 at 11:01 PM.
Benson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 04:46 PM   #7
spdway1
Senior Member
 
spdway1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicopee, MA
Posts: 1,400
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I do not want to put a Mitchell Overdrive in. What I am deciding on is doing an f150 transmission or a Mitchell syncro trans with a 3:54 ring and pinion. Please no extra shift lever.
spdway1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:02 PM   #8
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I think what he was trying to say was:
1) Mitchel Synchro Transmission + 3:54 R&P
OR
2) F150 OD Transmission (presumably with the standard 3:78 R&P)
__________________
Alaskan A's
Antique Auto Mushers of Alaska
Model A Ford Club of America
Model A Restorers Club
Antique Automobile Club of America
Mullins Owner's Club
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:21 PM   #9
Benson
Senior Member
 
Benson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,591
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

If I remember correctly there are several F-150 transmissions that have been used in Model A with different gear sets.


Some have very low ratios approaching "Granny gears" in 1st gear (lower than Model As 3.12). Which might make 1st gear not so desirable.

Last edited by Benson; 07-17-2015 at 06:30 PM.
Benson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2015, 09:50 AM   #10
spdway1
Senior Member
 
spdway1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicopee, MA
Posts: 1,400
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlG View Post
I think what he was trying to say was:
1) Mitchel Synchro Transmission + 3:54 R&P
OR
2) F150 OD Transmission (presumably with the standard 3:78 R&P)
YES, thank you.
spdway1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2015, 05:25 PM   #11
dr.j
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, ON, Canada
Posts: 315
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I run a Mitchel with higher 1st and 2nd with the 3.54 rear gear set. A perfect combo in my opinion. I ran it at 48 to 50 mph from home to French Lick last year for over 2,000 return miles and many more since. I like the syncro and I like to drive her like she was stolen.
__________________
Dave A Jamieson
Portland, ON
Canada
1928 Tudor
dr.j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2015, 07:02 PM   #12
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,488
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by forever4 View Post
Umm, 48-50 mph is the typical speed on any/every Model A, including my Fordor with 4.11. (for that matter, I run my stock Fordor at 65mph with 4.11 direct on flat interstate.)
Wow, how do you keep the centre main bearing in it?? Maybe it is pressure fed. I've found by experience anything over 45-48 mph risks expensive repairs.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood.
Synchro909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2015, 08:22 AM   #13
BILL WILLIAMSON
Senior Member
 
BILL WILLIAMSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: FRESNO, CA
Posts: 12,560
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

Thinking like, MORE or HIGHER is BETTER, it's easy to get a car OVER GEARED!
Friend, Hurshel, built a '46 Ford Tudor, with a '54 Lincoln engine, out of a big Ford Truck, 26 tooth Zephyer trans gears, 3:54 rear end & 8:20 tires! That sucker would go 1/2 the way to the COAST in SECOND gear!! SECOND gear was his PASSING GEAR!!---Gas mileage was TERRBLE.
Bill W.
__________________
"THE ASSISTANT GURU OF STUFF"
BILL WILLIAMSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2016, 03:14 PM   #14
Lanty
Junior Member
 
Lanty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

So spdway1 did you ever make a decision? I would love to hear how it worked out.


I too have been contemplating a very similar decision. I was thinking about a Mitchell syncto trans with a 3.54 or even 3.27 ring and pinion. I’m building a strong touring engine as we speak.


I just don’t know what 1 st and 2 nd would feel like with a 3.27 or if you get the 15% increased 1 st and 2 nd transmission option combined with the 3.27...Would it be too tall of a gear combo? I should have the power so lugging isn’t my concern.
Lanty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2016, 10:06 PM   #15
1929
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I have the Mitchel Synchro and the 3.54
1929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2016, 07:10 AM   #16
Del in NE Ohio
Senior Member
 
Del in NE Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbiana,OH
Posts: 461
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

I have F-150 4 speed and 3:54 ring/pinion with 16" wheels on my '31 CCPU. The O/D in this trans is .78 (Mitchell O/D is .74) I feel it is the best of both worlds.
Del in NE Ohio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2016, 08:11 AM   #17
Barry B./ Ma.
Senior Member
 
Barry B./ Ma.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southbridge, Ma.
Posts: 1,614
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

My 29 coupe has the Mitchell overdrive and stock 3:78 rear gears and with the Snyder 5.5 head and a touring cam I find that to be the most economical arrangement and encountering steep hills in high it is easy and quick to downshift overdrive to stock gearing and keep the rpms up,not lugging the engine. It easily runs at 55 on the level and I feel the stock narrow wheels are the only things that limit the handling. Going to 16" x 6.50 or equivalent radials would improve the high speed handling. Remember these things weren't made for high speeds anyway.
Barry B./ Ma. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2016, 10:31 AM   #18
1929
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 943
Default Re: Mitchell Syncro Transmission with a 3:54 Ring and Pinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry B./ Ma. View Post
My 29 coupe has the Mitchell overdrive and stock 3:78 rear gears and with the Snyder 5.5 head and a touring cam I find that to be the most economical arrangement and encountering steep hills in high it is easy and quick to downshift overdrive to stock gearing and keep the rpms up,not lugging the engine. It easily runs at 55 on the level and I feel the stock narrow wheels are the only things that limit the handling. Going to 16" x 6.50 or equivalent radials would improve the high speed handling. Remember these things weren't made for high speeds anyway.
I switched to the 16s, handles great, much better ride.
1929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.