Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2022, 12:36 PM   #1
52Allard
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 49
Default C69A Ultrasonic Cylinder Thickness Test

There has been some question / mystique about Canadian engine cylinder walls being thicker or better material. Not sure about the material question but I did find a C69A engine block for a project I'm working on and thought I'd share the ultrasonic test with the rest of the Ford community.
The measurements are taken in 4 X,Y directions in the cylinders from the top of the cylinder and down about 4 inches from the top. My block is standard bore with some wear (I'd guess .005" to .008" on the worst walls). The technician recorded the thinnest reading of each quadrant on the sheet. Looks to be mostly over .2" but a couple of locations at .17" - fortunately not on a thrust surface.

What are you guys seeing for cylinder wall thicknesses for a US made 59A engine block?
Attached Files
File Type: pdf C69A Engine block Ultrasonic004.pdf (1.37 MB, 44 views)
52Allard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2022, 01:05 PM   #2
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,750
Default Re: C69A Ultrasonic Cylinder Thickness Test

I checked a std bore 59A block recently.

These were the results.



Here are your numbers:


Without spending a long time analysing the results, I would say there isn't a big difference between them. Would anyone agree or disagree?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg paigntonsonicthou.jpg (45.7 KB, 153 views)
File Type: jpg c69asonic.jpg (30.4 KB, 153 views)

Last edited by Mart; 04-02-2022 at 01:10 PM.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-03-2022, 10:04 AM   #3
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,431
Default Re: C69A Ultrasonic Cylinder Thickness Test

Ford at the Rouge and Ford of Canada at the Windsor foundry likely followed along each others practices pretty closely. Materials were all coming down the same river but I'm not sure whether they were exactly the same resources or not. I figure that they probably were for the most part.

Nodular casting technology was still in its experimental stages in the early 50s and wasn't widely used yet. The latest technology in flathead V8 castings was by the French manufacture of the SUMB truck engines since these were still being cast right up into the early 1990s.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2022, 10:17 AM   #4
52Allard
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 49
Default Re: C69A Ultrasonic Cylinder Thickness Test

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mart View Post
I checked a std bore 59A block recently.

These were the results.



Here are your numbers:


Without spending a long time analysing the results, I would say there isn't a big difference between them. Would anyone agree or disagree?
Great information- your ultrasound guy did a much more detailed report than my guy did. I’d have to agree. They are pretty much the same… Maybe even a little better for the 59A.
52Allard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.