Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Late V8 (1954+)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2019, 01:09 PM   #1
all american boy
Senior Member
 
all american boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Podunk Junction, U.S.A.
Posts: 622
Default 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

It was worth the money getting this 'back issue'.


The explanation of MEL combustion chamber straightens you right out.


Sure hope I can use my pistons!!


Funny.It does not call the engines FE and MEL.


It just divides up engines into 3 little ones and 3 big ones.


I will check list against Wikipedia.


Worth the money if you are running a MEL or FE !
__________________
'Has racing made you a millionare?'


'Yes it has.Before I was a multi-millionaire.'-Quote
all american boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2019, 02:20 PM   #2
all american boy
Senior Member
 
all american boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Podunk Junction, U.S.A.
Posts: 622
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

Here is a pic of cover.


Small one are 332, 352 and 361.


Big ones are 383, 410 and 430.


Yep.They match up.FE and MEL.


Pretty interesting that 383 displacement.


Same as Chrysler new for '58 engine.


Guess they were firing a shot over at Chrysler engineering department.


Not quite a '58.Looked it up.It's RB engine.Came out year later.


The article calls MEL's an 'angle top' block.


Goes on to say piston tops create turbulence.


Necessary for complete combustion.


This 'on the spot' reporting is good stuff!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hot Rod 1959 Annual.jpg (15.2 KB, 23 views)
__________________
'Has racing made you a millionare?'


'Yes it has.Before I was a multi-millionaire.'-Quote
all american boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 05-22-2019, 04:12 PM   #3
Oldmics
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Balto.Md
Posts: 382
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

Thats the signpost up ahead


Welcome to


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G11AhAIf18A






Oldmics
Oldmics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2019, 04:42 PM   #4
Ole Don
Senior Member
 
Ole Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: St. Michael, Minnesota
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

Cubic inch displacement is what you get with a bore and stroke of certain dimensions. Down through the last 120 years, many different companies ended up with the same sized engines just by coincidence. I heavy trucks and tractors, we see it more than in passenger cars.
Ole Don is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2019, 06:26 PM   #5
all american boy
Senior Member
 
all american boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Podunk Junction, U.S.A.
Posts: 622
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

'ended up with the same sized engines just by coincidence.'


Probably.Chrysler held there ground though.They had '59 383 in the works.


Then Ford came out with one in '58 before they did and they just kept



working their plan.Would have cost them money to change it.


Then it doesn't matter really.


MEL 383 bore and stroke is 4.30 x 3.30


RB 383 is 4 and 1/32 x 3 3/4 in or 4.013 x 3.75


Different approaches for same displacement.
__________________
'Has racing made you a millionare?'


'Yes it has.Before I was a multi-millionaire.'-Quote
all american boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2019, 11:55 AM   #6
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,697
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I know this is a Ford forum, but the Chrysler RB 383 ended in '60, then went to a lower deck block for the 383 with a larger bore and shorter stroke.


Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2019, 01:31 PM   #7
rotorwrench
Senior Member
 
rotorwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,369
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

The MEL was a big block and ended up at 462 CID in Lincolns before Ford went to the 385 series 460 CID. The FE was considered a medium block so it was lighter but they were still just tinkering with it until the 390 came out in 1961. It was easier to produce than the MEL for mass production so it sort of took over most applications where that kind of power was needed. The FE design sort of tops out at 428 cubic inches but they did just fine with the 427 engines at NASCAR for the years they ran it.
rotorwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2019, 07:20 PM   #8
streetdreams
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Howell, Michigan, USA, The Peoples Slightly Overspent Demodependancy of Michigan
Posts: 638
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

The 427 also blew Enzo's ass into the weeds at LeMans
streetdreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2019, 10:11 PM   #9
56sedandelivery
Senior Member
 
56sedandelivery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 521
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

And the first three places no less.
56sedandelivery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2019, 01:34 PM   #10
V8 Bob
Senior Member
 
V8 Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Granger (Northern) Indiana
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

The '58-up 401/477/534 Super Duty truck engines also had the angled decks, flat heads and special pistons to create wedge shaped chambers, like the MELs and W Chevys.
V8 Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2019, 11:15 AM   #11
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,774
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by all american boy View Post
'ended up with the same sized engines just by coincidence.'


Probably.Chrysler held there ground though.They had '59 383 in the works.


Then Ford came out with one in '58 before they did and they just kept



working their plan.Would have cost them money to change it.


Then it doesn't matter really.


MEL 383 bore and stroke is 4.30 x 3.30


RB 383 is 4 and 1/32 x 3 3/4 in or 4.013 x 3.75

Different approaches for same displacement.
There were LOTS of coincidences like this! Such as 215 Plymouth and Dodge flathead sixes vs. 215 Ford OHV six. 292 Ford V8 vs. 292 Chev six. 327 Rambler V8 (1957) vs. Chev 327 V8 (1962). 360 Ford vs. 360 Dodge vs. 360 AMC. 361 Dodge vs. 361 Ford truck. 350 Dodge vs. 350 Chevy vs. 350 Buick vs. 350 Olds. vs. 350 Pontiac. 221 Ford flathead vs. 221 Ford small block (1962). 302 Ford vs. 302 Camaro Z28 vs. 302 GMC six. 427 Ford vs. 427 Chevy. 428 Ford vs. 428 Pontiac. 305 GMC V6 vs. 305 Chevy. 351 GMC V6 vs. 351 Ford. 401 GMC V6 vs. 401 Buick vs. 401 AMC. 307 Chevy vs. 307 Olds. 250 Chevy six vs. 250 Ford six vs. 250 Pontiac OHC six. 260 Ford vs. 260 Olds. 230 Jeep OHC six vs. Chevy 230 six vs. 230 Dodge flathead six. 265 Chrysler six vs. 265 Chevy V8. 303 Plymouth vs. 303 Olds. 289 Studebaker vs. 289 Ford. 301 Plymouth vs. 301 Pontiac. 400 Ford vs. 400 Chevy vs. 400 Chrysler. 239 Ford flathead vs. 239 Ford Y-block.
And the list goes on!

Add 352 Packard vs. 352 Ford. 390 Ford vs. 390 Cadillac vs. 390 AMC. 304 AMC V8 vs. 304 IHC (Scout) V8. 392 Chrysler Hemi vs. 392 IHC V8 (Travelall, etc.). 345 Desoto V8 vs. 345 IHC V8. The list may be endless!
None of these pairings have anything in common with each other! For example, a 327 Rambler V8 is totally different than a 327 Chevy. Nothing interchanges (except maybe rings if the bore size is the same). The same with all the others listed. (The 230 Pontiac OHC may share a few block parts with the 230 Chevy.)

Last edited by 40 Deluxe; 05-27-2019 at 05:19 PM. Reason: add more combinations
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2019, 07:55 PM   #12
all american boy
Senior Member
 
all american boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Podunk Junction, U.S.A.
Posts: 622
Default Re: 1959 Hot Rod Annual MEL and FE Engines

Interesting hop up article using Edsel 361 and Chevy 348.


Done by Isky complete with young Ed Iskendarian working on engines



pictures.


They were revving those puppies up to 6500 and 7000 rpm!


Getting valve float and fuel starvation at those speeds.


Burned a hole in top of Edsel piston.Stock one not the Police piston.


Distributor was not doing the job.


Solution was H-M (Harman Collins) two coil one.


Buy the annual!
__________________
'Has racing made you a millionare?'


'Yes it has.Before I was a multi-millionaire.'-Quote
all american boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.