|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-03-2011, 09:33 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
1932 pedal plate ID?????
OK...YES I read the book....
The Plate onthe left in the photo came of my original looking floorboard. It is 2 1/2" by 9 1/2" (I repainted it recently). When I thought I did not have the bottom plate I bought the plate on the right in the photo (Obviously modified). Questions: The plate on the left, I do not find in the book....is this an "A" part? The plate on the right is in the drawing on the bottom left on page 15-17. What is the plate on the left? Also, in reading the text and picture, they refer to a "weather pad" that goes between the plates. With the two 1"+ round pads on my "original", I don't see any way the weather pad would fit in between. Anyone have insight or better yet....pictures.... of this set up. |
08-03-2011, 11:25 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
The plate on the left is the early version used when the brake and clutch pedal were the same length from the pedal shaft to their 'elbows'. The plate on the right was used when they shortened the brake pedal in late May, 1932 (see page 15-16 text). Judging from your earlier photo of your top plate, the one on the left in this photo mates with your top plate. The two round rubber bumpers on the bottom plate face outward (downward) toward the pedals, hence they do not interfere with the sponge rubber 'weather' pad shown on page 15-17.
The pad shown on that page is the later pad and that is the one being reproduced currently. You will have to enlarge the opening for the brake pedal upward to accommodate your early 'taller' brake pedal. You will end up with a 'sandwich' of the top plate, weather pad, and lower plate from top to bottom. |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
08-04-2011, 09:48 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 432
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
...don't know if it is mentioned in "the book" ? but the Commercial plates are
different than the passenger plates due to the steeper angle of the steering column tube on Commercials. The cutout for the tube is longer on the Commercial I think???
__________________
Early V8 Garage Pasadena Roadster Club |
08-04-2011, 09:58 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern France
Posts: 5,306
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Richard, David G wrote the book and yes commercial steering tube slot is different.Did that 17 tooth speedo gear (LARS)work for you?
|
08-04-2011, 11:13 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 432
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Quote:
The speedo drive is sitting on my desk... but has worked fine so far! I could have sold it a few times already... ... but won't!!!
__________________
Early V8 Garage Pasadena Roadster Club |
|
08-04-2011, 11:54 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
|
08-04-2011, 10:23 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Richard,
Yes, it's in the book. The cutout in the commercial plates for the steering column tube is shallower than that for the passenger cars because of the more upright position of the steering column in those vehicles (except the sedan delivery, which has the same column angle as a passenger car)/ |
08-04-2011, 11:45 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 432
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Quote:
room? As they are, the 32 pedals are often very close to the steering column. We have found that many of the 32 brake pedals have "sagged" in that direction over the years, due to the way they are angled over to the left AND no doubt from people "standing" on the brake pedal trying to get it stopped... The pedal bushings also wear at an angle, causing the pedal to rub on the openings in the floor tin - very irritating. This also happens on 33-34's, but the column is way above the pedals on those...
__________________
Early V8 Garage Pasadena Roadster Club Last edited by Richard (EV8G); 08-05-2011 at 11:56 AM. |
|
08-05-2011, 12:12 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Richard,
Off the top of my head, the pedal was shortened by about a 1/2". I believe that the pedal change took place somewhat later than the firewall change. I'll check my resources and give you a better answer. Mike McKennett of Portland, Oregon reproduces both the upper and lower plates. His upper plate has the reinforcing beads like the original. As you said, worn upper and lower plates are commonplace on '32s and '33-'34s. |
08-05-2011, 12:15 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Richard,
I should have added that the brake pedal was shortened because of potential interference with the engine bell housings. David |
08-05-2011, 11:54 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 432
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
I was not aware of the pedal change. We have often encountered the interference when a later 59AB engine is installed in a 32, the remedy for which has been to "adjust" the attitude of the brake pedal so that it goes past the bell housing/block instead of hitting it, but not so far that the pedal/pad is too close to the steering column tube. We had thought that this problem was occurring because the later blocks are a little fatter than a 32-36 in that area, but apparently it was also a problem early on... Good to know! Thanks!
__________________
Early V8 Garage Pasadena Roadster Club |
08-05-2011, 09:30 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Richard,
You're welcome! David |
08-05-2011, 10:11 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Well here is mine. Several coats of Primer and several of enamel. Man these cars teach patience......
|
08-06-2011, 08:52 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Who sells the filler pad that goes between the plates?
|
08-06-2011, 10:45 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,101
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Dick Spadaro amongst many others.
|
08-06-2011, 01:43 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Cool I will call Dick Monday.
|
08-09-2011, 05:10 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 370
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Page 465 of Bob Drake's latest catalog shows a B-700392 Top Plate for $24.00 that looks like the one in Jim1932's picture four posts above . He doesn't list a Bottom Plate. I sold Bob a top plate like Jim's and a 32 Transmission Cover Plate a couple of years ago before Dave's new books came out. I'm not sure what version of the transmission cover plate that I sent Bob, but his reproduction of it isn't in his latest catalog.
__________________
I've got the old car disease. Thankfully there's no cure! |
08-09-2011, 09:29 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
The drawing on his doesn't match mine. His is rectangular while my original has the corners angled off on one end.
|
11-13-2011, 09:16 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Above the gnat line in Georgia
Posts: 7,009
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
Quote:
|
|
11-13-2011, 09:50 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hancock, MA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: 1932 pedal plate ID?????
|
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|