Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2020, 08:28 AM   #1
Admiral
Senior Member
 
Admiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
Default It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

After a month in the clutches of the USPS, my reground Isky 1007B camshaft FINALLY arrived from D&L Automachine (Thanks, Pete1!). Ain’t it pretty? Seriously, it’s almost too nice to use…









Anyway, as I start sourcing parts for the engine in my 1951 Ford, I have a few questions.

1. What valve springs should I run with this cam? I’d like the lowest seat pressure I can get away with. Would stock springs work?

2. What brand of valves and/or what vendor do you recommend for purchasing valves?

3. I’ve got a nice set of EAB heads. Can I run them with a 4-inch Mercury crank? If not, I also have a smattering of 8BAs. I assume shoot for around 0.050" piston-to-head and valve-to-head clearance, right?

4. For simplicity and drivability, I plan on running a single carburetor. Do the four-bolt Mercury intake manifolds flow more than the three-bolt Ford units or are they pretty much the same? Not sure if finding a Merc unit would be an improvement.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Isky-1007B-Cam-01.jpg (133.7 KB, 97 views)
File Type: jpg Isky-1007B-Cam-02.jpg (98.2 KB, 102 views)
File Type: jpg Isky-1007B-Cam-03.jpg (97.0 KB, 66 views)
File Type: jpg Isky-1007B-Cam-04.jpg (97.9 KB, 93 views)
File Type: jpg Isky-1007B-Cam-05.jpg (88.5 KB, 88 views)
Admiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 08:41 AM   #2
mfirth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: ohio
Posts: 986
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Admiral, Charlie NY did a 1 1/16 throttle bore 94 style carb for my 8BA with max 1 in it.
You could feel the difference, over the stcok 1" diameter 94. Just say'n. Charlie is easy to talk with..... Good luck & have fun!
mike
mfirth is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 08-06-2020, 08:50 AM   #3
Admiral
Senior Member
 
Admiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfirth View Post
Admiral, Charlie NY did a 1 1/16 throttle bore 94 style carb for my 8BA with max 1 in it.
You could feel the difference, over the stcok 1" diameter 94. Just say'n. Charlie is easy to talk with..... Good luck & have fun!
mike
Thanks for the feedback, mfirth! Actually, I've got a 1 1/16"-bore Holley rebuilt and ready to run. Glad to hear they work well with this sort of combination. I'm shooting for good drivability, lots of low- and mid-range torque, with a little more oopmh than stock. Also, you're totally right about Charlie. He's SUPER nice, helped me order some parts to rebuild that carb, actually.
Admiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 08:56 AM   #4
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,621
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

I’d talk to Pete on your valve questions...Im going to use a Merc intake on my next engine. Like the idea of the bigger bore 94..... Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 10:29 AM   #5
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,299
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Quote:
Originally Posted by flatford8 View Post
I’d talk to Pete on your valve questions...Im going to use a Merc intake on my next engine. Like the idea of the bigger bore 94..... Mark
I'm a little confused. The purpose of using a Merc manifold is to allow you to use a larger 4 bolt base carburetor (usually a Rochester 2G). Why would you consider a "bigger bore 94" (which flows a lot less than a 2G) which would require an adapter, which is usually not a good idea?

I will admit that I am a great booster of a 2G on a bored out merc manifold. The one problem I am having is getting the throttle to open all the way. Even with the throttle only opening 3/4 way, the increase in performance is impressive.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 11:16 AM   #6
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
About your valve question, This is one man's opinion: I used the Hi flow undercut stainless chevy valves from Red's Headers because of the smaller base of the reground cam. To keep seat pressure fairly low, I used Red's Lincoln springs and one .060" shim to get around 50# on the seat.

I'm also using a 2G on a bored Mercury manifold and a Charlie NY chevy distributor. Overall, it is a. good, reliable system. I just wish I had used one of Pete's 1007B cams.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 11:23 AM   #7
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,621
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

I liked the idea.... but obviously I would need to do more research. The way I read his post the big bore 94 was a Merc carb and was four bolt. When I’m ready to do the swap, maybe I can pick your brain on 2G info...... Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 12:13 PM   #8
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,299
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Quote:
Originally Posted by flatford8 View Post
I liked the idea.... but obviously I would need to do more research. The way I read his post the big bore 94 was a Merc carb and was four bolt. When I’m ready to do the swap, maybe I can pick your brain on 2G info...... Mark
If you're referring to me, please do, as I have done several. I have a jig that you can use to bore the manifold and had a bunch of 1/8" aluminum plates made to seal off the bottom of the 2G, which has some odd heat passages cast into it.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2020, 04:49 PM   #9
flatford8
Senior Member
 
flatford8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lyman,ME.
Posts: 2,621
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Yes, thanks. I had never heard of a “big bore-94” so I assumed it was a Merc carb. We all know what happens when we do that ...... Mark
__________________
I'm thinkin' about crankin'
My ragged ol' truck up
and haulin' myself into town.
Billy Joe Shaver

Last edited by flatford8; 08-06-2020 at 06:11 PM.
flatford8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2020, 05:21 PM   #10
Admiral
Senior Member
 
Admiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oakland County, Michigan
Posts: 562
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40cpe View Post
About your valve question, This is one man's opinion: I used the Hi flow undercut stainless chevy valves from Red's Headers because of the smaller base of the reground cam. To keep seat pressure fairly low, I used Red's Lincoln springs and one .060" shim to get around 50# on the seat.

I'm also using a 2G on a bored Mercury manifold and a Charlie NY chevy distributor. Overall, it is a. good, reliable system. I just wish I had used one of Pete's 1007B cams.
I was actually thinking of going with the valves offered by Red's Headers. I like that they have the non-grooved exhaust guides for slightly better heat transfer.

I think I'd like to run valve rotators for perhaps slightly improved longevity. Any idea if these work with the undercut, 1.5-inch Chevy valves?

Other than the four-bolt carburetor mount, is the Mercury manifold any different than the Ford design? Do they flow more?
Admiral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2020, 05:40 PM   #11
40cpe
Senior Member
 
40cpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Star, MS
Posts: 4,024
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

In stock form I remember that the rotator valve keepers utilized a shorter spring than the non-rotators, but i don't remember how much shorter. I might be enough that you don't need shims. Or maybe too much if you don't use short springs. Maybe someone will chime in with the difference in length.

I can't help you with the flow differences.
40cpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2020, 05:45 PM   #12
tubman
Senior Member
 
tubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 10,299
Default Re: It’s a thing of beauty! But now some questions…

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral View Post
I was actually thinking of going with the valves offered by Red's Headers. I like that they have the non-grooved exhaust guides for slightly better heat transfer.

I think I'd like to run valve rotators for perhaps slightly improved longevity. Any idea if these work with the undercut, 1.5-inch Chevy valves?

Other than the four-bolt carburetor mount, is the Mercury manifold any different than the Ford design? Do they flow more?
I bore mine all the way down to the base of the manifold and then round the edges of the transition from the throttle bores. I have no real measurements, but it seems to me that when the vertical passages transition to the eight passages to the individual ports, a lot of passage volume is encountered.

Take a look down an intake manifold and see what you think.
tubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.