Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2012, 06:44 PM   #1
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Now you know the rest of the story!

Some of you may have noticed that I had asked earlier how to remove the rivets from a front cross member. So I thought I would post some pictures of the front cross member of my coupe to show you why I think I ought to replace it.

The front view-first picture

The top view-second picture

From underneath-third picture

Looks like I may have to do some cutting before I can even get the spring out. I think a person could consider this a "farmer's fix".

Wish me luck!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00001a.jpg (33.6 KB, 319 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00025a.jpg (38.1 KB, 306 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00022a.jpg (37.6 KB, 298 views)
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 06:51 PM   #2
Aerocraft
Senior Member
 
Aerocraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,387
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Wow! Looks as if the welding was pasted on with a putty knife! It may have been done with the spring installed which would have compromised the heat treat in the spring. Damage like that is often done by a spring that doesn't have a tapered edge on the top leaf. Hope you were able to find a good crossmember. Gar Williams
Aerocraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-29-2012, 08:28 PM   #3
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Gar, I do have a good "new" cross member. The motor will come out tomorrow. Then the fun begins to try to get the spring and front end out of that cross member and then get that old cross member out of the frame.
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 10:03 AM   #4
Cool Hand Lurker
Senior Member
 
Cool Hand Lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Minn
Posts: 1,564
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Hey Fred, if it ain't broke don't ....... Oh, forget it.
Cool Hand Lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 06:11 PM   #5
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Well I really broke it.

Got the motor out, found some interesting stuff under the front motor mount (picture 1), cut off the angle iron that held held the front spring on (picture 3) and got the front cross member out (picture 2).

Now the question is how do I get the "New" front cross member back in? Does anyone have an easy way to do it? I thought I would put together some kind of frame spreader made out of a jack to spread the frame. If anyone has a better idea, please let me know.

Thanks for listening and the help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00001c.jpg (42.6 KB, 180 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00010b.jpg (39.8 KB, 203 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00004b.jpg (43.6 KB, 195 views)
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster

Last edited by Fred K-OR; 06-30-2012 at 06:21 PM.
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 06:59 PM   #6
Mike
Senior Member
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ASTON, PA.
Posts: 725
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Repair the old one, it is still better than the repro ones out there.

mike
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 09:36 PM   #7
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Mike the old one if far from being able to be repaired. I bought another used orginal one from a friend of mine-much better than the one I had.

Thanks for the concern.
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 10:36 PM   #8
TinCup
Senior Member
 
TinCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: OKC / Tonkawa, Ok.
Posts: 1,977
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Looks like one of my weld jobs.
TinCup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:21 PM   #9
columbiA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,746
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Many yrs ago I replaced a front C M and I think I put it in on an angle & beat it straight.Make sure its the correct C M for the car & the rivet spacing is correct.If you rebuild the front axle assy,and the steering gear,you will be able to toss the steering stabilizer.
columbiA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:54 PM   #10
Mike V. Florida
Senior Member
 
Mike V. Florida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 14,054
Send a message via AIM to Mike V. Florida
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Do you plan to rivet the new one in or bolt it in?
__________________
What's right about America is that although we have a mess of problems, we have great capacity - intellect and resources - to do some thing about them. - Henry Ford II
Mike V. Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 07:07 AM   #11
Aerocraft
Senior Member
 
Aerocraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,387
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

If I was installing a new cross member, I would cut the frame flanges at one frame horn ahead of the crossmember and, with heat, bend the horn outboard until the new crossmember will slip in. Once installed, straighten and weld the horn. The horns carry very little load in front of the front crossmember. They just need to be straight and parallel. Gar Williams
Aerocraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 10:58 AM   #12
Brentwood Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: brentwood, ca
Posts: 4,214
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Did mine with the frame off. I would pull the passenger side shock and install the new front cross brace from that side. Your difficulties in the car will be related to the rivets.
Very difficult to do a good job in the car. How do you drill out all the old rivets, how do you install heated rivets and buck them in the car.
The fix in the day was probably to bolt in the replacement. What ever way you go you will find alot of rust between the frame and the cross member. Taking care of that will be tough. Bob
Brentwood Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 11:04 AM   #13
Brentwood Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: brentwood, ca
Posts: 4,214
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Now I see you have removed the cross member. Do me a favor and replace the cinder blocks you have under the frame now. They won't hold up to abuse. Especially when you start persuading the cross member to accept the frame.
Bob
Brentwood Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 11:30 AM   #14
Cool Hand Lurker
Senior Member
 
Cool Hand Lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Minn
Posts: 1,564
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

I echo Brentwood Bob's warning on using the cinder blocks. They only have strength when they are positioned with the holes up and no strength sideways. Sometimes a tap on the side can collapse them, especially the way you have them positioned. Don't die over a crossmember.

As far as getting the new one in, cut off one of the horn extensions just in front of the crossmember where it will not affect the strength of the main frame. See if you can slide the crossmember into the other side first and then back to the correct position. You may have to cut off both horns though. I would cut them off completely with a hack saw so you don't cut out a large gap. Bevel the edges of the cut, clamp it back in the correct position and reweld.
Cool Hand Lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 02:41 PM   #15
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Bob, thanks for the warning about the blocks. I do have some additional ones so I could put them down flat using more of them.

I think I will bolt the "new-old" cross member in. I bolted one in a frame back in the 50's and the frame is currently in my Huckster. It worked fine for a number of years back in the 50's and still seems to work OK with the Huckster. This coupe is not going to be a points car (at least on my watch) but rather a driver. Bolting it in will not make it so a person, after me, that wants to make it into a points car can still do it.

Thanks for all the comments about how to get it back in. Next week I will have to sit on my stool in the old shop and ponder the best way (after getting better blocks under the rig). I got the old member out by pounding on one end one way and pounding on the other end the opposite way. So maybe?????
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 04:50 PM   #16
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Sorry for so many questions. But now I have the choice of two (Orginal I think) front cross members. The question I have is which one should be used in a 1929? I am sure both of these are 28-29 members because they have the round radiator holes (I know the glossy one has two extra holes) but I think maybe the one is for a 1928.

The picture shows that the dull colored one has ribs that cross it from front to back down where the motor hangs (see picture 1). It also has a raised back flang that sticks up (see picture 2 & 3). So I think it may be a 1928??? What do you think? The other member, the glossy one, is the same as the one I took out of the 29 coupe. So I think the glossy one is the one I think I will use. Could use any ideas anyone may have. Thanks again.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00002c.jpg (53.0 KB, 77 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00016c.jpg (29.0 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00018c.jpg (40.2 KB, 59 views)
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:00 PM   #17
VCS2
Member
 
VCS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 51
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Hello same question trying to figure out diffrence between 29 and 31 style crossmembers.

Is the picture attached also a 29?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1929 Front Crossmember 4.jpg (29.6 KB, 47 views)
VCS2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:10 PM   #18
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Quote:
Originally Posted by VCS2 View Post
Hello same question trying to figure out diffrence between 29 and 31 style crossmembers.

Is the picture attached also a 29?
My guess is that it is a 30-31 because of the long holes for the radiator.
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:14 PM   #19
JBill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 702
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

I'm forgetting a lot in my old age, but I don't recall getting the crossmember back in (after removing and repairing it) a major problem (like removing those $%&*$% rear hubs!). I was working with a bare frame, but I don't see why that should be a whole lot different. I'm trying to imagine why such drastic surgery as cutting off one (or both!) of the horns should be necessary. I like your first idea of spreading the frame slightly with a small bottle jack.
JBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:28 PM   #20
1931 flamingo
Senior Member
 
1931 flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,389
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Fred: Go down to harbor freight and get a couple of jack stands, about $15 with a coupon (usually in sunday's paper, hemming's, etc) and save your wife from having to take you places because it fell on you!!
Paul in CT
1931 flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:42 PM   #21
Bill Goddard
Senior Member
 
Bill Goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Shrewsbury,Pa
Posts: 513
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Fred, your lower dull colored CM is for a '29 because the rad mounting pads are flush with the top of the CM. The shinny one is for a 30-32 because it has resessed -I think -rad mtg pads and a hole on the left side(viewed from the driver's seat) for the radiator overflow tube.

VCS2, your CM is for a '30-31 because it has recessed rad mounting pads and the hole for the radiator overflow hose on the left end (viewed from driver's seat)
Bill Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:49 PM   #22
shuttlebuggy
Senior Member
 
shuttlebuggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 236
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

When did Ford change the front engine mounting from the two bolts in the back of the cross member to the saddle with the three springs?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P4080467.JPG (49.5 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg P4080455.JPG (55.5 KB, 18 views)

Last edited by shuttlebuggy; 07-01-2012 at 05:54 PM.
shuttlebuggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 07-01-2012, 06:55 PM   #23
Cool Hand Lurker
Senior Member
 
Cool Hand Lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Minn
Posts: 1,564
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

This is for the 30-31. The 28-29 crossmembers have the higher, non-recessed radiator mount pads.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Misc 012.jpg (63.8 KB, 17 views)
Cool Hand Lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 12:54 AM   #24
columbiA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,746
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

No one cut the frame horns off back in the day to replace the C M.With the C M removed the frame is quite flimsy and will be no trouble to get the new C M in place.The 28 C M,s had the two ribs pressed in the lower channel & the front mounts were often cut off so the later flexible mount could be used.
columbiA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 02:31 AM   #25
28ACoupe
Senior Member
 
28ACoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 559
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuttlebuggy View Post
When did Ford change the front engine mounting from the two bolts in the back of the cross member to the saddle with the three springs?
To get rid of engine vibration. It was a service bulletin.
__________________
1928 Model A Business Coupe
Rebuild picture gallery here
The light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off due to budget cuts.
28ACoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 10:55 AM   #26
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by columbiA View Post
No one cut the frame horns off back in the day to replace the C M.With the C M removed the frame is quite flimsy and will be no trouble to get the new C M in place.The 28 C M,s had the two ribs pressed in the lower channel & the front mounts were often cut off so the later flexible mount could be used.
Thanks for the info. Looks like the one C M I have is a 28.
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 12:15 PM   #27
Brentwood Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: brentwood, ca
Posts: 4,214
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

nix on better cinder blocks. You probably need a set of jack stands anyway. I like the large ones, what's a few more dollars. I can use the large ones to hold the rear end up when I pull the rearend. Bob
Brentwood Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 12:38 PM   #28
Benson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,579
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brentwood Bob View Post
nix on better cinder blocks. You probably need a set of jack stands anyway. I like the large ones, what's a few more dollars. I can use the large ones to hold the rear end up when I pull the rearend. Bob
Four legged jack stands are more steady than 3 legged ... worth the extra money!

I agree NEVER use cinderblocks.

Just for anyone reading this thread in the future that does not know this.

Cinder blocks are just plain dangerious no matter which way they are placed.

I saw a guy testing/running a car held up by cinderblocks once. The engine vibrations cracked a cinderblock on each side of the axle. Down went the axle with the wheels installed and turning. The car went out the garage in reverse and down the driveway.

Luckily he was standing in front of the car and transmission was in reverse!

If you are spinning the wheels when on stands ... have someone in the driver's seat to stop the car and use wheel chocks on the other two wheels.

Last edited by Benson; 07-02-2012 at 10:12 PM. Reason: missing words
Benson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 03:58 PM   #29
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,109
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

After purchasing a pair of 3-ton, and a pair of 4-ton jack stands, I found out that it takes at least 6-ton jack stands to adequately support the frame for a rear end removal.
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 06:10 PM   #30
Bill Goddard
Senior Member
 
Bill Goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Shrewsbury,Pa
Posts: 513
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

CarlG, I think you are saying its not the weight rating but the footprint. The wider the better. Bill G
Bill Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 06:19 PM   #31
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Well the front cross member is back in!!!! YAAA. It slipped right in. Bolted it down and it looks like a good driver cross member. I took the right shock absorber off and angled it a bit, tapped it a bit and it slid right in.

P.S. Guys I did beef up the supports under the car. I did put the cinder blocks flat with boards on top. Also have a second support sitting on my hydraulic jack. Plus I do not plan on being under the rig until I get it back on the front axle.

Thanks again for all your ideas and help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC000014aa.jpg (54.0 KB, 25 views)
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster

Last edited by Fred K-OR; 07-02-2012 at 06:29 PM.
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 08:41 AM   #32
jw hash
Senior Member
 
jw hash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auburn Washington
Posts: 2,550
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Fred
use the glossy one, it is correct for 29 the other one is early 28 that the back flang used to extend up and bolted to the front of motor someone has cut it off. the big diffrence 29 and 30-31 is the 29 radiator pads is same level as the top flang of the frame, on the 30-31 cross member the radiator pads are about 7/16" below the top flang of the frame
jw hash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 11:58 AM   #33
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

I did go ahead and use the glossy one. It matched the one I took out and seemed to be in better shape.

Thanks guys for all the ideas and help. Think I am on the way to get the "new" engine back in the rig one of these days.
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 12:19 PM   #34
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,109
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Goddard View Post
CarlG, I think you are saying its not the weight rating but the footprint. The wider the better. Bill G
Also, the height they will raise and still be stable. The 4-ton pair wouldn't lift the frame high enough to get the rear end with spring attached out from under it.

The 3-ton is quite adequate if you are supporting the car from the axle.
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 05:10 PM   #35
1931 flamingo
Senior Member
 
1931 flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,389
Default Re: Now you know the rest of the story!

CarlG: The whole car only weighs about 2500 lbs. When you were removing rear axle was that with the wheels on??
Paul in CT
1931 flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.